Welcome to the North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club Wednesday March 4, 2015
Home Forums WikiNASIOC Products Store Modifications Upgrade Garage
NASIOC
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Home Registration is free! Visit the NASIOC Store NASIOC Rules Search Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Calendar Archive NASIOC Upgrade Garage Logout
Go Back   NASIOC > NASIOC Technical > Factory 2.0L Turbo Powertrain (EJ Series Factory 2.0L Turbo)

Welcome to NASIOC - The world's largest online community for Subaru enthusiasts!
Welcome to the NASIOC.com Subaru forum.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, free of charge, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-24-2001, 04:16 PM   #1
Digital_Boy
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 730
Join Date: Jan 2000
Post

I would disagree with the comment that the EJ20 is stronger (assuming you mean the cylinders/cylinder deck) because some of the EJ20's were closed deck. The EJ25 is good to 500HP before you need to close the deck. The EJ25 is a newer design, and incorporates many improvements to the earlier EJ20's.

The EJ25 with a turbo is a better car for a daily driver due to the inherently better off boost torque. Also, having a 25% increase in displacement doesn't hurt either.

If you're building a track car, your options are as wide open as your checkbook can make them. You can build an EJ20 that will whip an EJ25's butt on the low end and top end, all it takes is money.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Digital_Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2001, 07:32 PM   #2
bill harvey
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 10
Join Date: Jul 2002
Chapter/Region: NESIC
Location: Aisle 3 next to the nuts
Vehicle:
2005 Legacy Gt wagon
Garnet red pearl

Post

the new wrx has a totally new designed ej20 so it's not because they had the motor sitting around.
bill harvey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2001, 10:12 PM   #3
doripreza
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 574
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Altadena,CA,USA
Vehicle:
99 Impreza RS
Black

Post

All the new WRX's have a new bottemend casting design that appears to have an addition piece of metal built into the decking i suppose to strengthen the block

its in Impreza Magazine VOL. 9

anyway i personally would take an built EJ25 over an buikt EJ20 anyday.

look at the JUN car its fast as full. not much use for the track but still faster than any EJ20 i've ever seen.. (Regoli excluded)
doripreza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2001, 01:51 AM   #4
JC
NASIOC Supporter
 
Member#: 692
Join Date: Dec 1999
Chapter/Region: SCIC
Vehicle:
2011 Grand Cherokee
Triumph Street Triple R

Question EJ20T vs EJ25T...

First off, yes I searched. Why did Subaru use the EJ20 instead of an EJ25 in the WRX? Wouldn't using the larger engine give it better off boost power?
JC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2001, 01:57 AM   #5
Prog
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 1473
Join Date: May 2000
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Vehicle:
2005 Legacy GT 5MT
Satin White Pearl

Post

IIRC, they did it because the ej25 was solely invented for the US market...again IIRC, earlier imprezas had 2.0 or 2.2 models, why? because (all of this is what i understand, not saying its fact) japanese companies are taxed by displacement, anything over 2.0L is way taxed...

also it may have been because of FIA regulations on WRC cars, which restrict them to 2.0L AFAIK... so the street cars had to have those specs

(a lot of japanese 2.0L turbos , the lancer evo, WRx, the DsM triplets, etc)
also this may be unrelated but smaller displacement engines are usually more free revving, (good for quickly building boost maybe?)
Prog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2001, 01:59 AM   #6
David the Bold
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 4791
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Post

They did it to conform to WRC rules. Apparently the WRC cars engine has to based on a production engine. Also, they've had the EJ20 in production (and therefor development) for years everywhere else in the world. It's also stronger because of it's smaller displacement.

[whoops, looks like Prog beat me to the punch]

[This message has been edited by David the Bold (edited March 24, 2001).]
David the Bold is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is it worth it to go from a EJ20t to a EJ25t? Cxracer1 Newbies & FAQs 11 03-18-2009 02:58 AM
EJ20T vs EJ25 in snow balajc General Community 11 12-08-2003 11:32 PM
ej25t sti uppipe/downpipe and turbo on and ej20t wrx? Benjamin Tang Factory 2.0L Turbo Powertrain (EJ Series Factory 2.0L Turbo) 12 06-12-2003 06:31 PM
EJ20T vs EJ20TT mykrrrr Normally Aspirated Powertrain 10 12-20-2000 11:51 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2015 Axivo Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2014, North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club, Inc.