Welcome to the North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club Wednesday October 1, 2014
Home Forums WikiNASIOC Products Store Modifications Upgrade Garage
NASIOC
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Home Registration is free! Visit the NASIOC Store NASIOC Rules Search Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Calendar Archive NASIOC Upgrade Garage Logout
Go Back   NASIOC > NASIOC General > Newbies & FAQs

Welcome to NASIOC - The world's largest online community for Subaru enthusiasts!
Welcome to the NASIOC.com Subaru forum.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, free of charge, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-11-2003, 02:30 AM   #1
NeoteriX
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 20999
Join Date: Jul 2002
Chapter/Region: NESIC
Location: NJ
Vehicle:
2002 PSM WRX Stg 2
knee - Aw - teh - rix

Default Differences in engines with same displacement, but different # of cyl.?

I was just pondering...

What are the differences in engines with the same displacement, but different number of cylinders?

I'm basically thinking of something like your (somewhat high end for a 4banger) 2.5L 4 cyl engine, like our beloved N/A or Turbo 2.5 boxer and your (somewhat low end) 2.5L 6 cyl engine, like the BMW inline used in the 325 or Suzuki's new 2.5L 6 cyl, and I'm sure there are Vees out there as well.

Why would someone choose one packaging over the other?

A couple things I see:

It seems that using 4 cyl would be lighter and lead to a less nose heavy weight distribution.

The inline 6 would have the inherent advantage of cancelling out all orders of motion (or whatever it is )


I guess where I'm getting at is which is the more "powerful" configuration, or what are the tradeoffs. Thanks
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
NeoteriX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2003, 09:42 AM   #2
balajc
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 15393
Join Date: Feb 2002
Chapter/Region: Tri-State
Location: Nassau County, LI
Vehicle:
MY00 2.5RS Coupe 5MT
Silverthorn Metallic

Default

I have a RS (2.5L H4) and a 325xi (2.5L I6) for the wife...the only thing I have observed so far is that the I6 is smoother?

of course the BMW makes more power than my RS (185hp VS 165hp and 170ftlb VS 166 ftlb)
balajc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2003, 10:18 AM   #3
Jack
Add Lightness
Moderator
 
Member#: 13699
Join Date: Dec 2001
Chapter/Region: NESIC
Location: Hopkinton, MA
Vehicle:
2007 Lotus Elise
(From General)

Default

The more cylinders you have, the smoother the engine can be without other measures (counter rotating shafts, etc). Less cyl's with the same displacement has the advantage of less rotating weight and less friction, so more potential power from the same displacement.

Engine design can have a huge contribution to all of this. The E30 M3 4 cyl engine was 2.3L but made 190hp and revs to a 7300rpm redline. Back long ago, my dad had a Chevy Vega with an aluminum 2.3L 4 cyl. I would be surprised if it made more than 75hp.

I was once in the market for a motorcycle and rode 2 different 650's. One was a 4 cyl and the other a 2cyl. The smoothness was obvious on the 4, but also, it had noticable "drag", while the 2 cyl felt more free'd up. I attribute that to the difference in internal weight and friction.

jack
Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2003, 11:34 AM   #4
inchoate
NASIOC Supporter
 
Member#: 5470
Join Date: Apr 2001
Chapter/Region: Tri-State
Location: Philadelphiaish
Vehicle:
2004 STi
blueish

Default

the big advantage of having more cylinders it that all of the reciprocating parts are smaller and lighter. this allows the engine to spin faster (higher rev limit). more revs=more fuel/air going through the engine which means more power. that's why F1 uses v tens.
inchoate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2003, 12:14 PM   #5
Eric SS
Sooby Guru
 
Member#: 1914
Join Date: Jul 2000
Chapter/Region: SWIC
Location: 2013 335i, 2011 G37 coupe
Vehicle:
2000 2.5RS w/ EJ22T
swap and N20. gone. : (

Default

Don't forget that the more cylinders you have, the more combustion events you have per cycle.

This means that if you have a 4 and 6 cylinder car making 240hp, the 4 cylinder is making 60hp per cylinder and the 6 cylinder is making 40hp per cylinder.

If you bump the power of the 6 cylinder to match the per cylinder power of the 4 cylinder (60hp/cylinder), you have 360hp

That gives you a lot more potential from the same displacement and same hp per cylinder.

Why do you think Ferrari V12's (like only 3.5 Litres) are so small but make so much power

Last edited by Eric SS; 09-11-2003 at 12:52 PM.
Eric SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2003, 01:16 PM   #6
cjbruce
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 34114
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Newbury Park, CA
Vehicle:
2003 WRX Wagon
WRB

Default Re: Differences in engines with same displacement, but different # of cyl.?

Quote:
Originally posted by NeoteriX
I was just pondering...

I guess where I'm getting at is which is the more "powerful" configuration, or what are the tradeoffs. Thanks
Of course the most "powerful" configuration is going to be a large-bore diesel. Gas engines are practically limited to around 6 inches linearly from the spark plug, while diesel bores can be made the size of a trash can. Nothing like standing on top of a piston while it goes up and down...

In a car, you first have to identify the purpose of the engine, then you identify the design constraints, then work on the design within the constraints. For example, if you want to design an ethanol-powered dragster, you would expect much greater latitude in terms of fuel efficiency than for a gasoline powered rally car.

So, some design constraints:
Weight
Overall width
Overall length
Overall height
Center of mass
Phyical relationship of engine output to driveshaft
Fuel efficiency
Torque/speed characteristics dictated by intended use (towing, acceleration, high-speed cruising)
Ease of maintenance
NVH
Cost

I think what you really meant to ask is "which piston configuration has the best torque/speed characteristic?" Recognizing that it depends on the application, here are a few generalities:

Greater bore displacement = more torque available at lower RPM
Turbocharger = more torque available at higher RPM
Supercharger = more torque available, RPM range depends on fan design
Intercooler = more torque available in "boosted" RPM range
More "oversquare" (bore dia > stroke length - a la Mustang) = "peakier" torque/speed curve weighted toward lower RPM range
More "undersquare" (bore dia < stroke length - a la BMW) = "smoother" torque/speed curve
Smaller bore displacement = smaller moving parts -> higher redline -> more RPM range available to take advantage of engine torque
Greater total displacement = more torque available throughout RPM range
cjbruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2003, 01:27 PM   #7
cavymeister
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 24463
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Leesburg, VA
Vehicle:
2003 Chevy S10
91 Hunduh Civic BASE

Default

don't forget about the Volvo 2.5L inline 5cyl... Or the Daimler Saloon 2.5L V8 (60's....)
cavymeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2003, 02:10 PM   #8
scotty305
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 8877
Join Date: Aug 2001
Chapter/Region: SCIC
Location: SoCal
Vehicle:
2000 Impreza 2.5RS
(sept '01-jan '04)

Default

From my experience with motorcycles:

Displacement being equal (both 1000cc), a 2-cylinder will have more low and mid-range torque, and a flatter powerband. A 4-cylinder will be smoother, higher revving, more peak (total) horsepower arriving at higher RPM's, and slightly better fuel economy.


Each is good for their own purposes. If you want max HP and don't mind revving the bejeezus out of the motor, more cylinders is the way to go. I prefer the driving characteristics (instant torque) of having less cylinders, and they tend to sound cool too (Ducati anyone?).

-s-
scotty305 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mixing same tires, but different load rating. Beanboy Tire & Wheel 2 03-19-2010 03:08 PM
Tires... Same size, but different brand... Soukyoku General Community 16 09-17-2009 12:35 AM
CEO and CFO with same face but different bodies!? TimStevens Off-Topic 21 05-12-2009 12:33 PM
same car but different nhmtns General Community 15 03-09-2008 12:40 PM
Is There A Difference In Suspensions With Different Models pao8511 Brakes, Steering & Suspension 6 02-01-2006 08:03 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2014 Axivo Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2014, North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club, Inc.