Welcome to the North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club Wednesday August 20, 2014
Home Forums WikiNASIOC Products Store Modifications Upgrade Garage
NASIOC
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Home Registration is free! Visit the NASIOC Store NASIOC Rules Search Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Calendar Archive NASIOC Upgrade Garage Logout
Go Back   NASIOC > NASIOC Technical > Normally Aspirated Powertrain

Welcome to NASIOC - The world's largest online community for Subaru enthusiasts!
Welcome to the NASIOC.com Subaru forum.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, free of charge, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-27-2004, 09:59 AM   #1
John*G
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 19562
Join Date: Jun 2002
Chapter/Region: NESIC
Location: VT
Vehicle:
93 Impreza wagon L
Mud

Default 2.5L rebuild questions

Hello:
I'm picking up a high milage DOHC 2.5 to swap into my 93L. 140,000. I would like to replace pistons/rings, bearings, cams. I have rebuilt many engines but not in the last 25 years. My only aluminium blockexperience was with Chevy Vega's, I have also done many TR3/TR4's, MG's V8's and Willy's Jeeps.
Besides the wierd head torque proceedure is there anything else that is much different ? Some questions.
1. Can you/should you mill the heads, How much can you get away with without negativly impacting cam timing, also what about thin head gaskets. I've read about the 4 layer improved gasket for the DOHC. We used to do three angle valve jobs to improve flow, do they still do this, or are valves and seats cut good from the factory?
2. What is the largest standard oversize piston you can get? Will these raise the compression or have they increased the "dish" to keep the compression the same? This will be a street engine but I would like to increase the compression a bit, should I go with something from TWE? ($700+ ouch)
3. How much compression works well with the street grinds available (the three I've looked at seem about the same). Has anyone sent their cams out to be welded and ground?
4. Bottom end, any weak spots there. Looks like a nice solid crank compared to a MG or Triumph. How is the balance from the factory? Anyone still knife edge their cranks? How about hi flow oil pumps??

And lastly, It seems the concensus is that these engines run rich on the 1.8 ECU. What if you put a controlled air leak upstream to the MAF?
Thanks
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
John*G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2004, 05:13 PM   #2
Storm
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 5218
Join Date: Mar 2001
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: SAUL'S Motorsports
Vehicle:
96L Most Over-
Developed Beater

Default

Since I'm doing the same thing, I'll answer what I can.

1. The heads should only be milled to SOA's limits. I think .010" is that limit. The motors are interference already, milling may only make it worse. I don't know where valve timing would become an issue, but Fidanza should release an adjustable cam pulley set in the not too distant future. (they have my pulleys as patterns)

2. SOA says +1mm for overbore limits. Pistons will be dished, but I don't know if the CR will be reduced or what. Not too much out there by the aftermarket, so prices reflect that.

3. Depending on what your goals are, custom cams can be made for whatever CR you run and RPM range you want. Most if not all aftermarket cams require yours in trade as cores, so I guess everyone is essentially doing the same thing. Getting accurate numbers is another story. Short of doing your own measurements on a set of reground cams, you have to choose between "mild/spicy" or "stageI/II"etc...

4. Phase I blocks have the crank thrust bearing in a different position than phase II blocks. An STi block (EJ257) would be strongest of all, but also the most expensive. Balance is good from the factory, but some folks have knife edged anyway. Subies crank is already well away from the oilpan, so I question the need for this other than "on-paper HP" Using a oil pump for the turbo motors is about the best you can find off the shelf. Same with the water pump.

Lastly, browse the "conversions" forum for more detailed info from folks running EJ25s on 1.8 and 2.2 ECUs. This is also what I'm in the process of doing.

Jay Storm
www.sourcemotorsports.com
Storm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2004, 12:50 PM   #3
John*G
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 19562
Join Date: Jun 2002
Chapter/Region: NESIC
Location: VT
Vehicle:
93 Impreza wagon L
Mud

Default

Thanks for the detailed response. Can you recommend a Cam grinder? Thanks
John*G is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2.5L Rebuild or can a 2.5i be used in a GC8 Animekiksazz Normally Aspirated Powertrain 0 06-24-2006 12:22 PM
STi 2.5L shortblock questions 992.5RS Factory 2.5L Turbo Powertrain 1 09-08-2005 05:02 AM
2.5l Conversion question ImprezaWRX02 Factory 2.0L Turbo Powertrain 6 12-13-2004 12:05 AM
2.5L RPM question trhoppe Factory 2.5L Turbo Powertrain 26 10-14-2004 09:39 PM
2.5l engine question danhtao Newbies & FAQs 7 09-03-2003 09:28 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2014 Axivo Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2014, North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club, Inc.