Welcome to the North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club Wednesday September 17, 2014
Home Forums WikiNASIOC Products Store Modifications Upgrade Garage
Click here to visit TireRack
Tire & Wheel Forum sponsored by The Tire Rack

Losing traction? Need new tires?
Click here to visit the NASIOC Upgrade Garage...
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Home Registration is free! Visit the NASIOC Store NASIOC Rules Search Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Calendar Archive NASIOC Upgrade Garage Logout
Go Back   NASIOC > NASIOC Technical > Tire & Wheel

Welcome to NASIOC - The world's largest online community for Subaru enthusiasts!
Welcome to the NASIOC.com Subaru forum.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, free of charge, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-01-2004, 04:58 PM   #1
gregeyberk
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 56152
Join Date: Feb 2004
Chapter/Region: NWIC
Location: San Francisco, CA
Subaru Stars Calling 2.5rs owners! Autox tire help needed

I am trying to find out if 215/45-16 Falken Azenis sports will work well on my stock 2001 2.5rs wheels and if thats even the best size for autox. Tires.com tried to warn me about reducing the sidewall size that much (stock is 205/55-16) but I dunno. The azenis' do come in a 205/55-16 size but that doesn't sound to appealling to me seeing as they are no wider and the sidewall is huge and will more easily roll during autox. Thanks for all your help guys.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
gregeyberk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2004, 05:59 PM   #2
AJ711
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 6178
Join Date: Apr 2001
Chapter/Region: MAIC
Location: Singletracks
Vehicle:
98 GM67 + 03 SG6
2 whls > 4 whls

Default

Do not limit your search to Falken. The BFGoodrich g-force KD's have served me very well in both auto-x and track days.

A great tire, lots of grip in the dry, not so well in the wet, but oh well. And, you can pick them up in 225-50-16, which will give you plenty of contact between the rubber and the road.

As for the Falken's, I'm not sure if dropping to a 45 series tire would do anything drastic. I'm sure it would work and fit fine (as I have 225's on my stockers for auto-x/track), but I haven't tried it.

AJ
AJ711 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2004, 03:24 AM   #3
imprezzakc
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 22462
Join Date: Aug 2002
Chapter/Region: SWIC
Location: Phoenix , Az
Vehicle:
2001 AutoFozzyFTW
SilvernBlack

Default

It looks like you did your homework as far as cost and grip goes ..
I think you need to ask yourself a couple of ?'s
1 are these tires going to be your daily tires also ? You understand you will lose major gas mileage .
2 If these will be strictly autox tires are the courses usualy on the short side ? If so your selection is perfect the smaller rollout wil help launch your car out of the corners . If local courses tend to be long IE 3rd gear or higer you may want to consider stock size tires .

Just my .02
imprezzakc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2004, 04:14 AM   #4
speed_freak27
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 30798
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: kansas city ks
Vehicle:
2001 RS-T Hybrid
2.5>2.2T>257>2.35S

Default

I've got these on my rs and they are great 215/45/16. I probably won't buy another brand of performance tire ever again unless it's a slick. Best bang for the buck in my opinion. I've had g-force tires they were ok but were more expensive less grippy and the wear was horrible feaking loud too. I tired two different yokohmaha's and was pretty satisfied with both I liked the es1000's best . They lasted a lot longer were good in the wet and were still pretty cheap. You might want to look into kuhmo as well.
speed_freak27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2004, 09:37 AM   #5
gregeyberk
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 56152
Join Date: Feb 2004
Chapter/Region: NWIC
Location: San Francisco, CA
Default

These are going to be my autox tires only. For summer I am going to have to buy Kumho supra's (w/ new wheels hopefully) for next year. As far as other tires go, I'm not really interested, i'm pretty much under the immpression that if you want to go autoxing you buy azenis. This is what everyone (including a skip barber instructor @rev it up) has told me and also the set up my brother's friend had when he went autoxing. SO the azenis's are on order, I can't wait till they get here. Thanks so much guys! Can't wait for autox!
gregeyberk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2004, 09:39 AM   #6
gregeyberk
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 56152
Join Date: Feb 2004
Chapter/Region: NWIC
Location: San Francisco, CA
Default

and the autox courses are usually short and tight; even in my rs I doubt I would ever need 3rd.
gregeyberk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2004, 10:08 AM   #7
Ramsdale
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 1951
Join Date: Jul 2000
Chapter/Region: NESIC
Location: NH, CT, hotels...
Vehicle:
08 M3

Default

I've been using 205/55 in the past, but was tempted to try 215/45 myself. Generally, people say the 215/45 offers better turn in response, and acceleration out of the tight spots.

One concern I had, though, was banging against the rev limiter. In places like Ft. Devens (in Mass), I would often hit the limiter during a run (on the 205/55s). The RS has a pretty low redline, and the 215/45's have a slightly smaller diameter. Thus, for a given speed, the engine is revving higher, and I would end up on the limiter longer unless I shifted.

My thoughts were to try 215/45, to see what difference they really made, and be ready to shift a bit. On tighter courses (like NHIS or other parking lot events), this might not be a problem.

Part of the fun is in trying things out!

KR
Ramsdale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2004, 10:46 AM   #8
subrew2
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 2883
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Burlington, VT
Vehicle:
2004 STi
Silver/Gold

Default

The biggest thing to consider on the 205 vs. 215 Falkens is the gearing. Plenty of courses see the 2.5RS at the top of 2nd gear already with stock sized tires. You'll be up against the limiter even sooner with the shorter 215/45 tires.

At ProSolos, where you want quicker acceleration off the line, and some of the courses have you in 3rd gear already, it might be a good choice.

Chris H.
subrew2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2004, 09:31 PM   #9
BHawk
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 61860
Join Date: May 2004
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: Mid-Mo
Vehicle:
2004 WRX STi
Aspen White

Default

You might consider the Kumho MX 225/50R16 as well grip like the BF Goodrichs, but cost alot less.
BHawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Calling all 2.5rs owners Suba_RS Vancouver Impreza Club Forum -- VIC 21 05-01-2006 02:24 AM
Any impreza'99 2.5RS owners... please help me! impreza2002 Normally Aspirated Powertrain 7 11-26-2002 12:44 PM
('93-'01) Calling all 2.5RS owners Richard L. Impreza Forum 8 09-11-2001 01:37 AM
('93-'01) Calling All CA 2.5RS Owners Greg 99 Impreza Forum 3 07-28-2001 04:49 AM
('93-'01) 2002 2.5RS Owners, Need Feedback! Dirt Man Impreza Forum 21 05-18-2001 08:42 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2014 Axivo Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2014, North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club, Inc.