Welcome to the North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club Saturday September 20, 2014
Home Forums WikiNASIOC Products Store Modifications Upgrade Garage
NASIOC
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Home Registration is free! Visit the NASIOC Store NASIOC Rules Search Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Calendar Archive NASIOC Upgrade Garage Logout
Go Back   NASIOC > NASIOC General > Proven Power Bragging

Welcome to NASIOC - The world's largest online community for Subaru enthusiasts!
Welcome to the NASIOC.com Subaru forum.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, free of charge, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-09-2005, 05:10 PM   #1
Swine
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 16197
Join Date: Mar 2002
Chapter/Region: South East
Location: Georgia
Vehicle:
05 LGT 18G-beater
12' Coyote Stang M6

Default Dynoed my 03 WRX Cobb stg 2...

Dynoed at Topspeed in Alpharetta, Ga...230 whp and 237 wtq...better then i expected it to be. This was on a new age dyno jet which reads lower then other dyno jets.

Graph
http://www.we-todd-did-racing.com/we...MXk1NDE%3D.jpg

*edit- Dyno Jet not Dyno dynamics
http://www.topspeedsales.com/aDyno/AWDDyno.html
Most dyno jets read high, although this is the newest model out and only two in the States. It reads lower then other Jets but, i am still suspicious it still reads alittle high.

Either way i am happy with the numbers.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.

Last edited by Swine; 05-09-2005 at 08:56 PM.
Swine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2005, 05:12 PM   #2
PJAWRX03
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 47426
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Viera, FL
Vehicle:
2003 Impreza WRX
Black

Default

Awesome...what is your mod list or are you all cobb components.

Phil
PJAWRX03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2005, 05:17 PM   #3
Swine
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 16197
Join Date: Mar 2002
Chapter/Region: South East
Location: Georgia
Vehicle:
05 LGT 18G-beater
12' Coyote Stang M6

Default

Ahh yes the mod list...

-Helix up/down pipe
-Boral hush with Mad Dad's 3inch adapter(MUFFLER REMOVED)
-Greddy intake($40, just for sound, i doubt it added any hp)
-Running cobbs 93 oct Stage 2 map(no reset tricks or anything)
Swine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2005, 05:30 PM   #4
Drews_WRX
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 20354
Join Date: Jun 2002
Chapter/Region: SCIC
Location: Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Vehicle:
2005 SRT-4
POS Mopar stage 2

Default

Dyno Dynamics huh

Nice numbers anyway.
Drews_WRX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2005, 05:53 PM   #5
23b_Rex
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 79394
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: reston
Vehicle:
02 gda
wrb

Default

congrats on the #s
23b_Rex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2005, 05:56 PM   #6
5spdfrk
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 46407
Join Date: Oct 2003
Chapter/Region: South East
Location: Way souf of ATL
Vehicle:
2002 WRX
blew

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drews_WRX
Dyno Dynamics huh

Nice numbers anyway.
What are you rolling your eyes for?
5spdfrk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2005, 06:02 PM   #7
bren wrx
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 59454
Join Date: Apr 2004
Chapter/Region: NESIC
Location: Worcester
Vehicle:
'10 E92 M3 M-DCT
brentuning.com/blog

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5spdfrk
What are you rolling your eyes for?
hes mad that cobb put down like negative hp on this car and he wasted 1000$ on xede to get the numbers this guy got on his cobb.

PS that a dynojet, not DD
bren wrx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2005, 06:15 PM   #8
subenerd
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 72630
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CA
Vehicle:
2004 STi

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bren wrx
hes mad that he wasted 600 on AP to get crappy #'s on 91 octane.
rephrased
subenerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2005, 06:20 PM   #9
popcrux
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 85829
Join Date: Apr 2005
Vehicle:
2005 WRX Wagon
CGM

Default

Those are some pretty darn impressive #'s w/ just those mods. Have any timeslips?

And as a side question, do those shorty intakes really do anything? Or are you better served to save money by throwing in a K&N Drop In filter?
popcrux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2005, 06:24 PM   #10
bren wrx
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 59454
Join Date: Apr 2004
Chapter/Region: NESIC
Location: Worcester
Vehicle:
'10 E92 M3 M-DCT
brentuning.com/blog

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by subenerd
rephrased
hes mad that he spent 600+1000 to put down what he should have with just 600$
bren wrx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2005, 06:30 PM   #11
Swine
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 16197
Join Date: Mar 2002
Chapter/Region: South East
Location: Georgia
Vehicle:
05 LGT 18G-beater
12' Coyote Stang M6

Default

With those mods exactly i went 13.5@100.25 with an easy 1.9 60' and some pretty easy shifting. The only thing that was different is that i had the hush muffler on. I acutually do think a few hp can be found by takeing off the muffler on hush exhuasts...i do notice a difference when i drive my car around with it on and off hp wise. I do truely think that the car has 101'ish mph in her. Not only do i think that because of my hp, but becuase i have done a few roll-ons with my brothers Evo that went 101.7mph and we are always dead even up untile the latter part of 4th(he has shorter gearing).

As for the intake...if your going for more hp, just leave the stock one alone and put the money else where. Shiv has dyno proven that a KN filter gives you no hp what-so-ever. I really even didnt want an intake, but i found my greddy almost brand new for $40 and figured it would be worth it for the sound. I would buy I/C hoses before an intake.
Swine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2005, 06:31 PM   #12
bren wrx
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 59454
Join Date: Apr 2004
Chapter/Region: NESIC
Location: Worcester
Vehicle:
'10 E92 M3 M-DCT
brentuning.com/blog

Default

hold out 4th on the evo, you should pull him back when he has to shift 5th
bren wrx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2005, 06:34 PM   #13
popcrux
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 85829
Join Date: Apr 2005
Vehicle:
2005 WRX Wagon
CGM

Default

Interesting.

So why is there the drastic difference in performance from two AP users then? It seems like your car responds fantastically to the 93 map and gets good times. But, the other person (who I assume is in CA) got horrible #'s from a 91 mapped AP?
popcrux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2005, 06:45 PM   #14
Blade
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 17012
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Vinings, Ga
Vehicle:
08 Black Corvette
385whp/378wtq stock

Default

I am swines brother w/ the Evo. We were a good race when I was stock with nothing but a BC. Now, I make 330whp on the same dyno he dyno'ed on today, so its a little bit different of a story now. The difference cams and a tune can make.
Blade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2005, 06:45 PM   #15
subenerd
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 72630
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CA
Vehicle:
2004 STi

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by popcrux
Interesting.

So why is there the drastic difference in performance from two AP users then? It seems like your car responds fantastically to the 93 map and gets good times. But, the other person (who I assume is in CA) got horrible #'s from a 91 mapped AP?

Make your own decisions....
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show...0&page=1&pp=25
subenerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2005, 06:46 PM   #16
WRX2FFU
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 73872
Join Date: Nov 2004
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: 6 ft from hell
Vehicle:
EJ25 ,EJ22,EJ20,EA82

Default

I also have had no issues with my stage293. I ran a 13.5 with a 1.880 sixty at 100. Great numbers btw. It's nice to see someone else happy with their AP.
WRX2FFU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2005, 07:15 PM   #17
popcrux
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 85829
Join Date: Apr 2005
Vehicle:
2005 WRX Wagon
CGM

Default

Yes, but living in Cali and reading through the previously linked threads, I'm starting to think twice about an AP 91 map.
popcrux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2005, 09:12 PM   #18
remowgn
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 41149
Join Date: Aug 2003
Chapter/Region: SCIC
Location: Orange, CA
Vehicle:
04 09 FXT
SSM

Default

I have an AP and live in CA, and i've had decent results. I do feed my car a diet of 76 gas pretty much exclusively, and that seems to help. When it's hot out, I use the Stg2 "california" map, which is not as agressive. The rest of the time I run the Stg2 HWG 91 octane map and it works great.

The newer maps that cobb has released really made a big difference in how well my car runs... it used to be that after resetting the ECU it would run great for about a tank worth of gas, and then I could feel it starting to pull timing and eventually it would revert to the "high det" map and it would be running like complete crap. Now I hardly ever need to reset the ecu, it just plain works.
remowgn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2005, 11:00 PM   #19
x99percent
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 27108
Join Date: Oct 2002
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: Detroit-ish, MI
Vehicle:
2004 STi
2004 A4

Default

*ANY* ECU reflash (AP/Cobb or EcuTeK) or piggyback tune (UTEC, Xede) that makes your ECU resort to using its "high det" fuel map is garbage.

(in the case of the UTEC's OLF, replace "using" with "trying to use" )
x99percent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2005, 03:11 AM   #20
jigga
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 9960
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: in bed...
Vehicle:
2002 Impreza WRX
WRBlue Perl

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by x99percent
*ANY* ECU reflash (AP/Cobb or EcuTeK) or piggyback tune (UTEC, Xede) that makes your ECU resort to using its "high det" fuel map is garbage.

(in the case of the UTEC's OLF, replace "using" with "trying to use" )
Your statement is not entirely true... A good reflash will resort to its high-det fuel map if for some reason the proper fuel is not available (ex. if you need to run regular gas in an emergency instead of the 94octane gas the car was tuned for).

Your statement however does hold true when the correct fuel is being run, and the ecu runs on the high-det map as default.
jigga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2005, 08:18 AM   #21
x99percent
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 27108
Join Date: Oct 2002
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: Detroit-ish, MI
Vehicle:
2004 STi
2004 A4

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jigga
Your statement however does hold true when the correct fuel is being run, and the ecu runs on the high-det map as default.
I would hope that running the proper fuel is a given.

Bad gas is bad gas, and the ECU should respond appropriately... but if you're running "good" 93 octane fuel, and your "93 octane" tune drops back to the high-det map... garbage.


The only other exception I can think of offhand is a case of extreme engine noise (badly built block).
x99percent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2005, 10:09 AM   #22
Drews_WRX
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 20354
Join Date: Jun 2002
Chapter/Region: SCIC
Location: Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Vehicle:
2005 SRT-4
POS Mopar stage 2

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bren wrx
hes mad that cobb put down like negative hp on this car and he wasted 1000$ on xede to get the numbers this guy got on his cobb.

PS that a dynojet, not DD
Not quite.....my car would make more power than that with 93 octane on that same dyno....
Drews_WRX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2005, 01:00 PM   #23
bren wrx
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 59454
Join Date: Apr 2004
Chapter/Region: NESIC
Location: Worcester
Vehicle:
'10 E92 M3 M-DCT
brentuning.com/blog

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drews_WRX
Not quite.....my car would make more power than that with 93 octane on that same dyno....
shoulda, coulda, woulda, cant. you live in pee gas state
bren wrx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2005, 07:48 PM   #24
03STAGE2
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 59465
Join Date: Apr 2004
Chapter/Region: South East
Location: JAX
Vehicle:
2003 Bugeye
G8RH8R

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bren wrx
shoulda, coulda, woulda, cant. you live in pee gas state
03STAGE2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
03 WRX cobb stg 2 Blue troy1004 Private Vehicle 'For Sale' Classifieds 0 09-19-2007 02:37 AM
04 WRX Cobb stg 2 datalog ?'s pottymouth AccessPort 12 02-15-2006 11:17 PM
2006 WRX + Cobb stg 2 estimates RexusFastus Factory 2.5L Turbo Powertrain 11 08-25-2005 09:09 PM
03 WRX Cobb Stg 2 93 octane on Dynojet Lordhowe Proven Power Bragging 40 03-11-2005 03:09 PM
2005 WRX Cobb STG 2 lower RPM stutter Killian Maynard Factory 2.0L Turbo Powertrain 11 02-17-2005 11:45 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2014 Axivo Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2014, North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club, Inc.