Welcome to the North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club Thursday August 28, 2014
Home Forums WikiNASIOC Products Store Modifications Upgrade Garage
NASIOC
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Home Registration is free! Visit the NASIOC Store NASIOC Rules Search Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Calendar Archive NASIOC Upgrade Garage Logout
Go Back   NASIOC > NASIOC General > Proven Power Bragging

Welcome to NASIOC - The world's largest online community for Subaru enthusiasts!
Welcome to the NASIOC.com Subaru forum.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, free of charge, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-22-2005, 08:04 PM   #1
superg
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 3385
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Golden, CO
Vehicle:
2002 WRX
WRB

Default Comparing dyno results: 50F vs. 90 F day

Twice I have dynoed my car on the same AWD Dynojet. Once when it was 50 degrees F and again recently at 90 degrees. Both at 5280 elev. Does the SAE correction for T, P and humidity (1.22 in the first case and 1.27 in the other) make the hp and tq numbers from the two days comparable? What sort of % error should one expect between different days and dramatically different atmospheric conditions? Even with the correction, would the turbo spool be different (laggier) at 90 degrees than at 50 degrees?

Just trying to figure out if the 6-8 ft lb drop and slightly slower spool is due to atmospherics or the underdrive pulley I replaced with stock recently (tired of p0340 CELs).

Superg

thanks

Superg
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
superg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2005, 08:13 PM   #2
Drews_WRX
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 20354
Join Date: Jun 2002
Chapter/Region: SCIC
Location: Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Vehicle:
2005 SRT-4
POS Mopar stage 2

Default

if you're trying to compare both runs, (50 vs 90) and the difference in power between the two, overlay both run files on the same graph and post it up. Making sure that the CF setting is at UNCORRECTED....this would show real WHP on the 50 degree day and the 90 degree day....there should be a difference.

With the CF on SAE, it adjusts both runs to as if there were run @ say 70 degrees....that is why one got multiplied 1.22 and the other 1.27.
Drews_WRX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2005, 10:16 PM   #3
Driver72
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 13720
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Default

If you had an underdrive (or lightweight) pulley on for the earlier
runs, and went back to stock for the other, that probably
IS why you lost 6-8 ft lbs.
If you kept getting CEL with the underdrive pulley...just go
with a stock diameter lightweight one.
You'll get 80-85% of the power gains, but without any of the underdrive
pulley drawbacks...and therefore probably no CEL's.
LW Crank pulleys are a cheap ($125) way to get more power to the wheels.
Driver72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dyno Results: Flat Plate vs Divorced W/G luspeed Proven Power Bragging 56 10-15-2012 11:26 PM
Dyno numbers on a hot day vs a cool day chads09 Newbies & FAQs 23 02-17-2010 07:38 PM
Sreet Tune, Dyno Results: JDM STi EJ207 Blouch Dom3, dyno video too DuCash Proven Power Bragging 46 11-01-2009 11:25 AM
Latest dyno results: 145hp, 144ft-lb on Mustang dyno Patrick Olsen Normally Aspirated Powertrain 39 08-27-2008 03:19 AM
Dyno results: Injen CAI vs. "Torque Box" CAI Patrick Olsen Normally Aspirated Powertrain 45 08-13-2007 12:39 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2014 Axivo Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2014, North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club, Inc.