|
||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|
|||||||




![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 4992
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Vancouver. BC, CANADA
Vehicle:2000 Impreza 2.5 RS Blue Ridge Pearl |
This is sort of a crossover topic. I have a Canadian MY00 2.5 that I'm turboing as we speak. I'm not sure how many of you are familiar with the CDN front bumper for the RS, but a FMIC will not fit.
I need a new bumper, either a stock US bumper (which I'd gladly take off of someone's hands used), or an aftermarket front bumper that can host a large 'cooler. Any suggestions and/or bumpers for sale?
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 2348
Join Date: Sep 2000
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: St.Louis
Vehicle:2006 WRX TR Steel Grey Metallic |
look in Dres up and Style. The Apex, C-West or Us spec 99on RS bumper will all fit your needs.
Why a front mount though? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 2348
Join Date: Sep 2000
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: St.Louis
Vehicle:2006 WRX TR Steel Grey Metallic |
here is the apex kit
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 4992
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Vancouver. BC, CANADA
Vehicle:2000 Impreza 2.5 RS Blue Ridge Pearl |
A FMIC will also fit under the US stock bumper, correct?
I want to do the front mount kit because ultimately it offers better performance. There's less heat-soak from the engine and you can get a larger core exposed to a lot of airflow. Bigger isn't always better, but as long as you have sufficient cold airflow (front of the vehicle is the best place for this) and you're not too close to a large heat source (top of the engine - heat rises) you're in pretty good shape. The only issue with a front mount is making sure you have sufficient distance from the rad. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 4992
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Vancouver. BC, CANADA
Vehicle:2000 Impreza 2.5 RS Blue Ridge Pearl |
Yup, not only will I be running significant boost levels, but we might be feeding the intake manifold backwards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 5786
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: RS202
|
No offense Dabbler, but that is a total pile of crap. Think of the piping as a straw. The faster you blow into it, the faster the air or liquid comes out. The reaction is instantanious. The cooling is way more efficiant, adding horsepower and making tunning easier. The ONLY real benifit to a top mount, is it is cheaper.
Again, I don't mean to offend you, just tired of this old wives tale. Kevin |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 4992
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Vancouver. BC, CANADA
Vehicle:2000 Impreza 2.5 RS Blue Ridge Pearl |
Unlike a milkshake or some water in a straw, air is compressable, so the longer the system the slower response you get.
Also there's more inertia, leading to a slower reaction. And with more piping and bends the dynamics of the airflow can be distorded providing a slowed airstream. However, a larger front-mount core has more cooling potential and in most situations will provide better results. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Scooby Guru
Member#: 2692
Join Date: Oct 2000
Chapter/Region:
SCIC
Location: SoCal
|
true, and true, still a front mount from me. Heat soak sucks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 4540
Join Date: Feb 2001
Vehicle:MY00 2.5RS Sedan Abnormally Aspirated |
Quote:
I had deleted my post before I saw your reply, since I decided not to risk turning this into another FMIC vs TMIC flamefest (but I was too late). For the benefit of the late comers, I had suggested that the additional piping may outweigh the benefits of the improved cooling.To expand upon your reasoning, Kevin, so, if the intercooling piping were, say, a mile long, then performance would be unaffected? Or would the simple fact that there is more piping (and therefore more volume to pressurize) result in a problem say, with boost response? And if your piping were twisted into a pretzel, would that also leave the flow unaffected? Extreme examples, of course, but made to illustrate a point. I didn't mean to suggest that an FMIC is necessarily worse than a TMIC. I'm certainly sure it cools better. If that additional cooling gives more benefit than the loss due to the piping, then great. I think Really_Soaked understood my concerns and also that I wasn't trying to put him down. Sorry for the confusion. [Edit -- Just saw additional replies from both Kevin and Really_Soaked. Geez! Either I type too slow, or you people are camped on this topic! Anyways. Points made all around. FMIC is a better option for some people. Good luck, Really_Soaked.] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 5786
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: RS202
|
![]() Good point, but way extreme. Anyway, I'm sure you would change your mind if you could watch your intake temps while sitting at a light. I've seen it, and it's not pretty. I'm glad nobody took offense. Kevin |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 4540
Join Date: Feb 2001
Vehicle:MY00 2.5RS Sedan Abnormally Aspirated |
A TMIC definitely has problems of its own. Where did I read that the Subaru engineers referred to the top-mounted WRC intercooler as "the interwarmer"? I'm sure they may have preferred the front location, if they didn't have to worry about it getting smashed up in jumps and things like that. And the esteemed Corky Bell refers to underhood intercoolers as potential "interheaters".
So I will readily admit I'm not sold on TMIC over FMIC. Looking forward to some numbers by someone who's tried both ways with a setup similar to my own. Nice Pokemon icon, by the way... What the hell does it mean? |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 5786
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: RS202
|
Abolutely nothing, I just love using these smile things.Kevin |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 4992
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Vancouver. BC, CANADA
Vehicle:2000 Impreza 2.5 RS Blue Ridge Pearl |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
SCIC
Moderator Member#: 85
Join Date: Jul 1999
Chapter/Region:
SCIC
Location: www.themonkeystrunk.com
|
Really_Soaked you can see mine that I am using for the same style front bumper you have as soon as I can get it installed. (BTW Kevin UPS sucks as they dropped it off at the office instead of at my place W T F )
Rich |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 4992
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Vancouver. BC, CANADA
Vehicle:2000 Impreza 2.5 RS Blue Ridge Pearl |
Cool let me know when you've got some pictures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 1170
Join Date: Mar 2000
Chapter/Region:
BAIC
Location: San Jose, CA
Vehicle:2005 STi White |
id like to see the different air temps that a FMIC gets vs a TMIC
edit: a question... can you compensate the pressure lost by turning up the boost? if the pressure drop at 25psi is 1psi, what is it at around 10psi? |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 5786
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: RS202
|
If there is a pressure drop, crank up the boost.
Kevin |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 1170
Join Date: Mar 2000
Chapter/Region:
BAIC
Location: San Jose, CA
Vehicle:2005 STi White |
that might fix the pressure drop issue but doenst that affect other things?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 5786
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: RS202
|
Not really, you are just upping the boost to where it was origianlly. With the front mount, heating the air up a little more won't hurt anything.
K |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 4540
Join Date: Feb 2001
Vehicle:MY00 2.5RS Sedan Abnormally Aspirated |
You would still have the problem of having to pressurize a larger volume, which would decrease throttle response. However, this may not be a big deal, either because the actual decrease is minimal, or the particular application is not adversely affected by it.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS-STi front bumper...Fmic cutout, primed ready for paint. | dblurx4 | SWIC Private Classifieds | 7 | 03-11-2010 04:43 PM |
| FS/FT - MI: SSAC FMIC, Custom Front Bumper Beam, 2006/2007 Front Bumper Cover | FuelCutOff | Engine/Power/Exhaust | 6 | 10-16-2009 05:16 PM |
| WTT: SWP front bumper cut for FMIC for a SWP stock front bumper. | Spooky | SCIC Private Classifieds | 19 | 10-27-2008 10:37 AM |
| WTT: FMIC w/cut 04 WRX bumper for Stock front bumper | Chandy69 | NESIC Private Classifieds | 5 | 04-30-2007 07:05 PM |
| WTT: 04-05 WRB STI front bumper ready for FMIC for uncut stock bumper | ninjaboy76 | Private 'Wanted' Classifieds | 0 | 11-23-2006 12:13 PM |