View Single Post
Old 11-22-2006, 12:50 PM   #9
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 39503
Join Date: Jul 2003

Originally Posted by crazyhorse View Post

On what planet does a Camry come close to WRX performance? It's a bland car built to purposely be blah and plain. They're boring to drive and Toyota just banks on the reputation (whether it's still true or not) to sell the vehicle.

Ignoring my obvious Subaru bias there are quite a few other vehicles out there that could be better choices. I think they're just happy they actually did SOMETHING to the design of that car.

0 to 60 in 6 seconds comes pretty close. Definitely better than an automatic WRX. I drove the 2 litre WRX and thought it was a joke. I got out of it thinking "you must have to launch this thing at 6000 rpms to get a sub 6 seconds zero to 60". Those 5.5 0 to 60 times on stock WRX's? Forget about it. Not going to happen unless you have a warhehouse of spare transmissions LOL.The Camry is a an awesome sleeper: You don't have to worry about people thinking you're a scrawny high school kid! Boring >Ugly
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.

Last edited by Corkfish; 11-22-2006 at 01:30 PM.
Corkfish is offline   Reply With Quote