View Single Post
Old 08-20-2011, 10:31 AM   #22
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 250286
Join Date: Jun 2010
Chapter/Region: Tri-State
Location: Putnam/Westchester
09GR phatbottiPowrd
T.S.P.'s test mule


Originally Posted by arghx7 View Post
Yeah we all know how BMW's V10 worked out in the emissions department... terrible fuel economy when put in those big boats. Their current n/a V8 didn't work out well either or they wouldn't have just scrapped it like that. The other problem with the high revving engines is that there is basically no application for them outside of these low production cars, so cost sharing becomes difficult.

For the record I like high revving n/a engines. But I think they are pointless in M cars because M cars are too heavy now and they've been that way for about 10 years. When I drove the now-outgoing V10 M5 a couple years ago I wasn't impressed because the car was too heavy. Big fat vehicles like that need torque.
Yea, 0-60 in 4.5 seconds(not on launch control) and capable of 200+MPH for being 4000+lbs, and being engineered in 2004 isnt impressive at all
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Spin1200 is offline   Reply With Quote