View Single Post
Old 03-28-2012, 02:04 PM   #14
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 302559
Join Date: Nov 2011

Originally Posted by MrH View Post
Can't understand Subaru's thinking.
Whats the point of having two 2.5 N/A engines?
The FB is a better engine.
Why not just drop it in the Leggy and be done with it?
If they stick with the EJ, it will be because the FB doesn't fit as a drop in replacement and they don't want to retool the engine bay for a car that is getting replaced in ~2 years with an all new model. Also FB CVT may be a fitment issue.

I don't mind the EJ, aside from the fact that is uses a timing belt which makes for a costly replacement every 75K miles Real world MPG between the EJ and the DB doesn't seem to differ by much.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.

Last edited by ocellaris; 03-28-2012 at 02:17 PM.
ocellaris is offline   Reply With Quote