View Single Post
Old 09-28-2012, 11:59 AM   #111
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 206332
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: In a tent

Originally Posted by spaceywilly View Post
No, I meant objective. I know the difference, I was not born yesterday. The SH Forester is a conservative design that does not mess with the traditional SUV looks like past subaru models have. It has a traditional 2 box shape, rectangular non-bulbous headlights, and normal looking wheel arch lines. It doesn't have the "WTF were they going for here" looks that subaru models usually have with curves that go nowhere, random shapes thrown in for no reason, and headlights that stick out the side of the car. Subjectively, many people have emotional attachments to Subaru's designs so they think, in their opinion, they are good looking. In reality they are hideous but they grow on you because you form emotional attachments to the car itself, so in your mind it becomes better looking. This is why whenever a new Subaru is introduced, people think it is the ugliest thing ever, then after it has been out for a while rallying in the mud and having crazy melon launcher exhausts stuck on it, people think it is the best looking car ever. There is an objective aspect to design.

Nope you still don't know the difference. Why don't you go to an online dictionary and post the definitions of the two terms. Because I'm not convinced you know the difference.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
53x12 is offline   Reply With Quote