Originally Posted by Charge
That's pretty amazing since there is no such thing as a "60hz" plasma.
Come back when you actually understand that plasma is an inherently different technology than LCD and you can't compare those numbers. You do realize the 480 or 600Mhz ratings you'd see on plasmas has no correlation to the "refresh" rate numbers quoted on LCD's right? Probably not.
Spinning a short post with marketing terms into me putting subfield drive and refresh rate in the same basket? Color me unimpressed. Was keeping it simple for the common folks. Refresh rates are somewhat bogus anyways.last time I was researching tv's the basis should have been on pixel response time. In that regard ... Plasma technology is still king, no? It was in 2009 anyways...