View Single Post
Old 11-07-2012, 03:29 PM   #16
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 139444
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: PA
2008 Impreza
Dark Gray


Originally Posted by shikataganai View Post
Uh, but CR did test the Ecoboost while towing:

(might not work without login) source:

If you're saying they didn't provide separate mpg figures for towing and unloaded, ok, fine.
I don't have a login for CR, and for good reason.

Ok they did test towing but it's completely idiotic because they have the lowest rear end ratio in the ecoboost. 3.31 is for the buyer who only tows a garden utility trailer or simply doesn't ever tow with their truck and wants the best possible unloaded mpg. For people that tow on occasion or moderate 3-5klbs loads, they would get the 3.55 rear end. For people that tow often or heavy loads >5klbs you would get the 3.73 rear end.

The fact that they would do comparisons in towing using the worst possible rear end to tow 7500lbs is beyond me. Shows you how flawed this test is using max tow ratings by optioning the trucks with different rear end ratios in an effort to make an apples to apples comparison is just silly. It's called "consumer" reports, and any buyer knowing they'll be towing 7500lbs more than a few miles is going to opt for the 3.73 rear end with either engine. With those rear's they chose, they should have used a more realistic weight like 3-4000lbs.

An yes, i would like to see the towing mileage and unloaded mileage in the report. Consumers can make better decisions knowing how often they use the truck for either situation. They would opt for the engine based on their lifestyle.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
gggplaya is offline   Reply With Quote