Originally Posted by scott_gunn
I disagree. There are plenty of people looking for a small RWD sporty car that settle for the CTS despite it's size - as evidenced by the information in the article.
Originally Posted by KC
Correct. There are people that want American luxury, and don't want FWD/Buick or Lincoln TownCars.
Caddy has been the only real game in town with the CTS being the only one.
Now that ATS is here, they can downsize and get better gas mileage.
Sorry... what I meant to say was anyone looking for the sport/size of the CTS won't likely pick up an ATS, but people who want the smaller sportier cousin... makes sense.
I wouldn't want anything smaller... better gas mileage might be nice, but I'd lose to much in the trade. The ATS trunk is small... like WRX (plus a little) small.