Originally Posted by jthatch12
I'm totally going to build that gauge for my capstone project next semester.
Anyway back on topic, is the sampling rate of SD logging significantly slower in comparison to normal logging?
You got it reversed. SD logging is significantly faster than normal logging. The sampling rate is still tied to the number of parameters but it is MUCH faster. To give you an idea, I am collecting 15 counters and I get about 35 samples per second, where 1 of the counters requires extensive calculations (those slow it down). So, I am running slower than normal 15 counters would. Normal logging can't touch that kind of rate.