View Single Post
Old 11-10-2012, 09:33 AM   #9
Scooby Guru
Member#: 92634
Join Date: Aug 2005
Chapter/Region: RMIC
'19 Volvo XC40
'19 Pacifica PHEV


Originally Posted by White out
why not modify tanks to fit under the body?
Possible. Have to shield them down there and harder to get the GGEs desired due to packaging + long cylindrical shape of tanks. Example: WorldCNG can stuff 9.2 GGE of tanks under a Yukon/Tahoe. Compare that to the 18.2 GGE in the bed-stealing Ram in the OP.

Originally Posted by sxotty
Yay a truck that you cannot use the bed of... That is why everyone wants a truck right? Anyway seriously if it makes people happy fine they can buy what they want. BTW didn't honda discontinue the phill station for home owners of CNG vehicles?
Fuelmaker, maker of the Phill and larger VRAs alike, went broke and was snapped up by an Italian company. Now they are BRC Fuelmaker, thus the domain name: .As a side note, the Phill itself makes less sense than the larger VRAs like the FMQ-2-36:

As for the bed length issue: not such a big deal when you consider the restricted payload. Carry people or dense cargo. Pick one.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
shikataganai is offline   Reply With Quote