View Single Post
Old 11-19-2002, 12:44 PM   #5
supermoose
Visiting NASIOC Timeout
 
Member#: 9093
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SF
Vehicle:
1995 RHD STi RA Ver2
swap starr

Default --

my car came stock with tiny 9.5" 1 pots in the front, and drums in the rear. the fronts first got ditched for 10.7" 2 pot RS brakes. that felt REALLY stiff. pedal travel was minimal b4 grabbing, then the rear awd subframe conversion happened with teh 10.5" outback discs, that felt not bad, but not nearly as solid as the drums in the back. pedal travel increased. then the 4 pot fronts were fitted, and pedal travel decreased again. it feels quite good, i dont think as little pedal travel as the 10.7 f / drum rear, but its got a bunch more modulation bc the rotor in the front is so big and the caliper is massive. ive driven the WRX front brake setup in several cars, and i would guess that it needs less fluid than my 4 pot front, with my 93L master cylinder, it would probbly have quite decent feel and not that much travel.ar

h
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
supermoose is offline   Reply With Quote