View Single Post
Old 04-09-2019, 02:53 PM   #9
neg_matnik
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 132389
Join Date: Nov 2006
Chapter/Region: BAIC
Location: SF Bay Area
Vehicle:
2006 WRX Wagon SGM
2003 SV1000S, 2014 DL650

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sid03SVT View Post
This goes directly against FCA's move with Dodge products, mainly that you only innovate as much as you absolutely have to, and never try to save weight, ever.
It's a legit complaint, but saving weight on a long wheelbase vehicle is hard.
Challenger wheelbase is 116" and Charger is 120".
For comparison purposes, BMW 5er wheelbase is 117" and 7er is 126".
MB S class short wheelbase is 119.5", long wheelbase is 124.6".
Chevy SS is 114.5", Tauris is 112.9".
Camaro is 110" and Mustang is 107".

I'm just trying to provide perspective here; the only way to save weight is to go with a much shorter wheelbase, which means less space for occupants.
I think Dodge would lose the few customers they have if they shrank Charger or Challenger; that's why they're not going to do it.
They'd need to come up with different models altogether alongside Charger/Challenger.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
neg_matnik is offline   Reply With Quote