Quote:
Originally Posted by skywaffles
You're converting something that has 900 BTU/ft3 (CNG) to hydrogen which has about a third of that, AND incurring a penalty for the conversion process, which is only about 80% efficient. It's an absurd false economy on par with corn ethanol.
IF the hydrogen can be sourced from the dissociation of water AND renewable energy is used to power it THEN hydrogen could make sense. That's a lot of work to produce a fuel with poor energy density. Using energy dense fossil fuels to produce hydrogen is the pinnacle of stupidity.
|
No, I think a solar powered flashlight is more of the pinnacle of stupidity.