Welcome to the North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club Sunday July 5, 2020
Home Forums Images WikiNASIOC Products Store Modifications Upgrade Garage
NASIOC
Go Back   NASIOC > NASIOC Technical > Factory 2.5L Turbo Powertrain (EJ Series Factory 2.5L Turbo)

Welcome to NASIOC - The world's largest online community for Subaru enthusiasts!
Welcome to the NASIOC.com Subaru forum.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, free of charge, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.







* As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. 
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads. 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-17-2020, 02:26 AM   #451
jskar89
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 513819
Join Date: Apr 2020
Default

Strongly considering picking up this kit and have one question:

I am running a rotated Precision 6062. Because this turbo is oil-cooled and the cylinder 3 port is plugged now, would cylinder 3 now theoretically be running at a higher temp just like cylinder 4?

This is where my ignorance shines through. I lack the knowledge on how the coolant loop now functions when cylinder 3 is plugged due to an oil-cooled turbo. If this area is now at a reduced flow like cylinder 4, I am wondering what the fix would be for cylinder 3.

Appreciate any help on this and apologies for my lack of knowledge on this particular subject.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
jskar89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Old 04-17-2020, 02:48 AM   #452
TifosiWA
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 489993
Join Date: Aug 2018
Chapter/Region: NWIC
Location: PNW
Vehicle:
2019 WRX STI LTD
Pure Red

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spoolinsti05 View Post
The real question is how can they prove the parts you put on caused the failure. And is it legitimate.
Like Car_freak85 said earlier, MMA only covers direct replacement parts. So unless it is a direct replacement, they donít have to. In this situation, regardless how great the part is, you are adding an aftermarket part and altering what is the original design of the engine. Which is why I am wondering if anyone happens to know of any conversation off the record.
TifosiWA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2020, 06:48 AM   #453
spoolinsti05
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 108051
Join Date: Feb 2006
Chapter/Region: Tri-State
Location: NY
Vehicle:
2005 TickingTimeBomb
Jr tuned TT Sleeved

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TifosiWA View Post
Like Car_freak85 said earlier, MMA only covers direct replacement parts. So unless it is a direct replacement, they donít have to. In this situation, regardless how great the part is, you are adding an aftermarket part and altering what is the original design of the engine. Which is why I am wondering if anyone happens to know of any conversation off the record.
It really depends on the dealership. A long time ago my car needed a wheel bearing. And it was still under warranty. But the car had 500whp. They could've easily said the added power strained it. But they replaced it and told me dude your car is awesome!
spoolinsti05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2020, 03:14 PM   #454
car_freak85
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 13530
Join Date: Dec 2001
Chapter/Region: NWIC
Location: Cascadia
Vehicle:
EA63 , EA81T, EJ20G,
EJ205

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TifosiWA View Post
Like Car_freak85 said earlier, MMA only covers direct replacement parts. So unless it is a direct replacement, they don’t have to. In this situation, regardless how great the part is, you are adding an aftermarket part and altering what is the original design of the engine. Which is why I am wondering if anyone happens to know of any conversation off the record.
Bingo. You'd have to know the Japanese engineer who designed the twin-turbo EJ engine's cooling circuit to really know the inside scoop (the theory being Dom modeled his part on the cooling circuit nipple present on these TT engines). Maybe @teshimades, the styling designer of the original Impreza, could give us the powertrain engineer's contact information so we could get the final word on all of this?

Quote:
Originally Posted by spoolinsti05 View Post
It really depends on the dealership.
Partly on the dealer's reporting to the mothership, but the final say lies with the OEM. On a piddling warranty request like a wheel bearing, yeah, probably not a big deal and it'll get pencil whipped. But this cooling mod doesn't mount to a low-buck assembly like the spindle. Anything funny about a dusted engine under warranty is going to draw the Eye of Sauron before the mothership cuts a check to the dealership for the warranty repair.
car_freak85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2020, 04:15 PM   #455
KillerBMotorsport
NASIOC Vendor
 
Member#: 198281
Join Date: Dec 2008
Chapter/Region: MAIC
Location: Virginia
Vehicle:
2005 WRX/STi
WRB of course

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by car_freak85 View Post
/\ Only applies to direct replacement parts like tires, brake pads, piston rings, etc., not hot rodding parts. If you knowingly modify an assembly using parts that were never installed in the first place, that is what voids your warranty.
Not how I remember it, but in all honesty I haven't reviewed that document in probably over 10 years. Sounds like I need to review.
KillerBMotorsport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2020, 04:27 PM   #456
car_freak85
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 13530
Join Date: Dec 2001
Chapter/Region: NWIC
Location: Cascadia
Vehicle:
EA63 , EA81T, EJ20G,
EJ205

Default

Basically you can use whatever brand of air filter you prefer, any oil that is the correct grade, silicone wiper blades, etc. <-- It would be on them to prove a like-for-like part caused the failure.

What you can't do is install a Spoolinator turbo kit under warranty and expect Subaru to cover your ring lands. <--Not hard to prove you intentionally modified the warranted assembly with the intent to alter it from its intended design/purpose/whathaveyou, regardless if the part/modification actually caused the failure.

Maintenance is protected under the MMA, hotrodding is not.
car_freak85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2020, 05:23 PM   #457
spoolinsti05
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 108051
Join Date: Feb 2006
Chapter/Region: Tri-State
Location: NY
Vehicle:
2005 TickingTimeBomb
Jr tuned TT Sleeved

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by car_freak85 View Post
Bingo. You'd have to know the Japanese engineer who designed the twin-turbo EJ engine's cooling circuit to really know the inside scoop (the theory being Dom modeled his part on the cooling circuit nipple present on these TT engines). Maybe @teshimades, the styling designer of the original Impreza, could give us the powertrain engineer's contact information so we could get the final word on all of this?



Partly on the dealer's reporting to the mothership, but the final say lies with the OEM. On a piddling warranty request like a wheel bearing, yeah, probably not a big deal and it'll get pencil whipped. But this cooling mod doesn't mount to a low-buck assembly like the spindle. Anything funny about a dusted engine under warranty is going to draw the Eye of Sauron before the mothership cuts a check to the dealership for the warranty repair.
I can understand if the car came in with no coolant in it. Or a blockage in the added part. But I really don't see them glancing at that and saying nope take it out of here.
spoolinsti05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2020, 08:07 PM   #458
TifosiWA
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 489993
Join Date: Aug 2018
Chapter/Region: NWIC
Location: PNW
Vehicle:
2019 WRX STI LTD
Pure Red

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spoolinsti05 View Post
I can understand if the car came in with no coolant in it. Or a blockage in the added part. But I really don't see them glancing at that and saying nope take it out of here.
If we are talking about a $200 repair, maybe not. If we are talking about a >$2,000 repair bill, you can almost certainly bet that they will.
TifosiWA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2020, 11:37 PM   #459
spoolinsti05
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 108051
Join Date: Feb 2006
Chapter/Region: Tri-State
Location: NY
Vehicle:
2005 TickingTimeBomb
Jr tuned TT Sleeved

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TifosiWA View Post
If we are talking about a $200 repair, maybe not. If we are talking about a >$2,000 repair bill, you can almost certainly bet that they will.
Idk I bought my car from dealer and it's never been back **** them they're crooks. Even if they do a warranty job on a full engine rebuild they will most likely do a **** job granted it depends on the tech and how he takes pride in his work. But it'll also come down to what the dealers willing to replace. If it's worn out but in spec you better believe they will use it. Me on the other hand no. If I can afford it it's getting replaced if not cars sitting while I daily my nice comfy ua6 Acura lol and I'll still walk all over a wrx on the highway with that to boot!
spoolinsti05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2020, 10:07 PM   #460
Murphdog
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 75414
Join Date: Nov 2004
Chapter/Region: RMIC
Location: Rock Springs,Wyoming
Vehicle:
2004 STi
Its the Blue one

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jskar89 View Post
Strongly considering picking up this kit and have one question:



I am running a rotated Precision 6062. Because this turbo is oil-cooled and the cylinder 3 port is plugged now, would cylinder 3 now theoretically be running at a higher temp just like cylinder 4?



This is where my ignorance shines through. I lack the knowledge on how the coolant loop now functions when cylinder 3 is plugged due to an oil-cooled turbo. If this area is now at a reduced flow like cylinder 4, I am wondering what the fix would be for cylinder 3.



Appreciate any help on this and apologies for my lack of knowledge on this particular subject.


Iíd be really curious about this as well.
Murphdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2020, 06:17 AM   #461
asdrewq
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 508752
Join Date: Nov 2019
Vehicle:
2004 Forester STI
JDM - WR blue

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Murphdog View Post
Iíd be really curious about this as well.
Bearing in mind the block isn't completely symmetrical, but broadly speaking yes - you're correct - it would make sense to add an outlet to the back side of each block, in order to ensure similar coolant flow past each of the rear cylinders.
asdrewq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2020, 04:00 AM   #462
jokem
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 504281
Join Date: Jul 2019
Default

I was taking a look at the cooling diagram:

https://i.imgur.com/sCbV9gA.jpg

With our without this mod, it looks like coolant flow on the LHS never gets routed through the radiator, so the hot coolant coming from the LHS is cooled down by the cooler coolant coming from the radiator.

So if the mod adds the new flow path indicated by the green path, you're effectively lowering the temperature of (14) LHS Cylinder Head over cylinder #4 by not allowing all the hot coolant that passed through cylinder #2 to pass through the LHS head over cylinder #4.

This looks like it mimics what the turbo line does for the RHS, except the redirected coolant doesn't flow through the radiator.

The EGT balancing out post-mod seem to make sense. Cylinder 4 still should have the hottest EGT since some coolant flow from Cylinder 2 passes through the Cylinder 4 channel.

Without the mod, I don't know how much the coolant cools down on the LHS after leaving the LHS head and before reaching the water pump again. With the mod, the coolant would have less time to cool down since it gets redirected to the water pump faster, making the coolant temperature at the water pump higher as well, which also explains the higher EGT for Cylinder's 1,2,3. Although, given this line of thought, I would expect Cylinder 3's EGT to be higher than Cylinder 1 (assuming all other factors held equal).

Perhaps "increasing coolant flow" isn't the most accurate description?

The net effect seems desirable! I'm wondering what people's experience with this mod has been long-term as it sounds interesting!
jokem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2020, 08:39 AM   #463
snow_bound26
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 395793
Join Date: Jul 2014
Chapter/Region: Tri-State
Vehicle:
2005 92x Aero
Blue(retired�ȸ

Default

I've been in another thread discussing this topic as well. I just bought the Vems kit and am toying with the idea of modifying it to flow into the upper res via the coolant outlet from the turbo.

Based on the above diagram, it does appear this may produce the best results since it will go directly to the radiator. However, will it be too much coolant for those small diameter lines? It does appear to be the same path Subaru used for the TT Legacy's.
snow_bound26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 01:34 PM   #464
RavensFan7
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 346388
Join Date: Feb 2013
Chapter/Region: MAIC
Location: PA
Vehicle:
2001 Ej205 Impreza L
SRP

Default DOHC EJ Cylinder 4 Combustion Chamber Cooling kit

Quote:
Originally Posted by jokem View Post
I was taking a look at the cooling diagram:

With our without this mod, it looks like coolant flow on the LHS never gets routed through the radiator, so the hot coolant coming from the LHS is cooled down by the cooler coolant coming from the radiator.

So if the mod adds the new flow path indicated by the green path, you're effectively lowering the temperature of (14) LHS Cylinder Head over cylinder #4 by not allowing all the hot coolant that passed through cylinder #2 to pass through the LHS head over cylinder #4.

This looks like it mimics what the turbo line does for the RHS, except the redirected coolant doesn't flow through the radiator.

The EGT balancing out post-mod seem to make sense. Cylinder 4 still should have the hottest EGT since some coolant flow from Cylinder 2 passes through the Cylinder 4 channel.

Without the mod, I don't know how much the coolant cools down on the LHS after leaving the LHS head and before reaching the water pump again. With the mod, the coolant would have less time to cool down since it gets redirected to the water pump faster, making the coolant temperature at the water pump higher as well, which also explains the higher EGT for Cylinder's 1,2,3. Although, given this line of thought, I would expect Cylinder 3's EGT to be higher than Cylinder 1 (assuming all other factors held equal).

Perhaps "increasing coolant flow" isn't the most accurate description?

The net effect seems desirable! I'm wondering what people's experience with this mod has been long-term as it sounds interesting!

The left side, 2&4, has worse coolant flow than the right side, 1&3. Thatís why this exists. Go to post #19. The right side doesnít really need this. The main thing is youíre getting heat OUT of cylinder 4 and more coolant flow around it.

It doesnít really matter that the hot coolant gets redirected back into water pump. The oil cooler, and most of the upper reservoir already flow back to the water pump. Thatís a non-issue.

Quote:
Originally Posted by snow_bound26 View Post
I've been in another thread discussing this topic as well. I just bought the Vems kit and am toying with the idea of modifying it to flow into the upper res via the coolant outlet from the turbo.

Based on the above diagram, it does appear this may produce the best results since it will go directly to the radiator. However, will it be too much coolant for those small diameter lines? It does appear to be the same path Subaru used for the TT Legacy's.

Not all of the upper reservoir flows through the radiator. Looking at hose size, most of it flows back into the water pump. There would probably be no difference between doing that, or just going into the heater core return.

Last edited by RavensFan7; Yesterday at 01:41 PM.
RavensFan7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 10:47 PM   #465
JarHarms
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 138994
Join Date: Jan 2007
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: DeKalb-ish, IL
Vehicle:
2006 WRX, 6MT, 5x114
TMIC, FP blue, ELH

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jokem View Post
I was taking a look at the cooling diagram:...
With our without this mod, it looks like coolant flow on the LHS never gets routed through the radiator, so the hot coolant coming from the LHS is cooled down by the cooler coolant coming from the radiator. So if the mod adds the new flow path indicated by the green path, you're effectively lowering the temperature of (14) LHS Cylinder Head over cylinder #4 by not allowing all the hot coolant that passed through cylinder #2 to pass through the LHS head over cylinder #4. This looks like it mimics what the turbo line does for the RHS, except the redirected coolant doesn't flow through the radiator. The EGT balancing out post-mod seem to make sense. Cylinder 4 still should have the hottest EGT since some coolant flow from Cylinder 2 passes through the Cylinder 4 channel. Without the mod, I don't know how much the coolant cools down on the LHS after leaving the LHS head and before reaching the water pump again. With the mod, the coolant would have less time to cool down since it gets redirected to the water pump faster, making the coolant temperature at the water pump higher as well, which also explains the higher EGT for Cylinder's 1,2,3. Although, given this line of thought, I would expect Cylinder 3's EGT to be higher than Cylinder 1 (assuming all other factors held equal)...

Quote:
Originally Posted by snow_bound26 View Post
I've been in another thread discussing this topic as well. I just bought the Vems kit and am toying with the idea of modifying it to flow into the upper res via the coolant outlet from the turbo.
Based on the above diagram, it does appear this may produce the best results since it will go directly to the radiator. However, will it be too much coolant for those small diameter lines? It does appear to be the same path Subaru used for the TT Legacy's.
Yes that is the same routing used on the JDM TT Legacy by way of formed steel pipe across the engine. So you "want" an additional rubber hose cooling circuit across your engine? Sounds like a risky coolant leak failure someday. Just saying.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RavensFan7 View Post
...Not all of the upper reservoir flows through the radiator. Looking at hose size, most of it flows back into the water pump. There would probably be no difference between doing that, or just going into the heater core return.
Thank you! Glad somebody knows how to correctly interpret a cooling diagram. That small-ish "direct to radiator" hose is nothing more than a de-aeration circuit. As you said the main flow from the upper tank is back to the same location these mod kits are placing the tees. So same task accomplished one with a shorter circuit and one with a longer circuit across the engine.



Is it just me...the topic of this coolant mod is most like reality show entertainment. Just plain silly.
JarHarms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 11:04 PM   #466
viper_crazy
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 298403
Join Date: Oct 2011
Chapter/Region: W. Canada
Vehicle:
2008 WRX Premium
Spark Silver

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JarHarms View Post
Yes that is the same routing used on the JDM TT Legacy by way of formed steel pipe across the engine. So you "want" an additional rubber hose cooling circuit across your engine? Sounds like a risky coolant leak failure someday. Just saying.
You do realize this mod adds 4 connection points to the coolant system all with the potential to leak down the road, whether it's routed to the heater core lines or the upper tank. It is totally and completely possible to route a coolant hose and properly secure it in a way that it will last many, many years before a leak may occur. Idk what redneck rigging you have in mind but anyone who can think outside the box and do it properly...well, I'll digress...

"Just saying."
viper_crazy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 11:35 PM   #467
JarHarms
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 138994
Join Date: Jan 2007
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: DeKalb-ish, IL
Vehicle:
2006 WRX, 6MT, 5x114
TMIC, FP blue, ELH

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by viper_crazy View Post
You do realize this mod adds 4 connection points to the coolant system all with the potential to leak down the road, whether it's routed to the heater core lines or the upper tank. It is totally and completely possible to route a coolant hose and properly secure it in a way that it will last many, many years before a leak may occur. Idk what redneck rigging you have in mind but anyone who can think outside the box and do it properly...well, I'll digress...

"Just saying."
Yes, I am capable of grasping that concept. I can also tie my own shoe laces but what does such a lame internet dig accomplish here? Both routing methods have the same number of added leak paths. No one method wins in that regard. So...are you suggesting adding a 2-3 foot length of rubber coolant hose securely across the engine is a great idea? Yea maybe for some and not for others. I am sure that anyone capable of tying their own shoe laces should be able to handle routing and securing rubber hose in their engine bay. That is hardly what I would call either redneck rigging or thinking outside the box.
JarHarms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 12:40 AM   #468
viper_crazy
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 298403
Join Date: Oct 2011
Chapter/Region: W. Canada
Vehicle:
2008 WRX Premium
Spark Silver

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JarHarms View Post
Yes, I am capable of grasping that concept. I can also tie my own shoe laces but what does such a lame internet dig accomplish here? Both routing methods have the same number of added leak paths. No one method wins in that regard. So...are you suggesting adding a 2-3 foot length of rubber coolant hose securely across the engine is a great idea? Yea maybe for some and not for others. I am sure that anyone capable of tying their own shoe laces should be able to handle routing and securing rubber hose in their engine bay. That is hardly what I would call either redneck rigging or thinking outside the box.
So, your concerns over where the mod is routed is basically a moot point...

Why did you even bring it up as a concern in the first place???
viper_crazy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2020 Axivo Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2019, North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club, Inc.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.