Welcome to the North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club Thursday July 20, 2017
Home Forums WikiNASIOC Products Store Modifications Upgrade Garage
Go Back   NASIOC > NASIOC Technical > Subaru Conversions

Welcome to NASIOC - The world's largest online community for Subaru enthusiasts!
Welcome to the NASIOC.com Subaru forum.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, free of charge, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads. 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-04-2005, 01:14 PM   #1
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 8335
Join Date: Jul 2001
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: www.indianaimpreza.com
96 Impreza L 2.2t
99 Impreza L Wagon

Question Old vs new NA 2.2 engines

Hi all

The short version of my question is: what are the differences between the early (90-94) and the later (95-up) 2.2 NA motors? Are the internals of either a better choice for handling moderate boost? Are the long blocks interchangeable (could I put a 94 engine in a 96 car, and vice versa, without any major issues)?

The longer version (for those killing time at work)Ö I have a 96 impreza L(2.2 L) that runs great. I want to turbo the car sometime in the near future. Also, I just acquired a 94 legacy wagon (2.2L) with a bad rod bearing. The goal is to turbo the impreza and fix the leggy wagon and keep it NA as a daily driver. If there are no major compatibility issues between the longblocks, Iíll pull the running 2.2 out of the impreza and stick it right in the wagon. Then Iíll build the broken 2.2 from the wagon, or get another motor all together to put in the impreza with a turbo kit. But, if swapping the motors between the 94 and 96 is a bad idea, Iíll have to come up with another plan..

Iím no noob, this just isnít an easy topic to search forÖ

Thanks for your help, and sorry for the long post,

Elwood is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stage 2 old vs. new cobb downpipe? MarkRx AccessPort 4 02-06-2007 03:42 AM
I guess it's official now Old VS. New ? weric General Community 6 09-26-2002 01:56 PM
HMMM, Old vs. new Exhaust? DDMan Normally Aspirated Powertrain 3 11-24-2001 05:43 AM
('93-'01) Long commutes: Old vs. New Impreza. Thoughts? danc Impreza Forum 15 09-17-2001 05:39 PM
('93-'01) Opinions on Old vs. New RS? (serious post) Stoopid MOMO Impreza Forum 6 08-17-2001 12:31 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2017 Axivo Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2017, North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club, Inc.