|
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-07-2010, 02:33 AM | #26 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 140444
Join Date: Feb 2007
Chapter/Region:
NWIC
Location: Near Seattle, WA
Vehicle:05 Stage Free LGT ATP 3076, 6MT, AVO FMIC |
Stock sensor moved to bellmouth, vs PLX SM-AFR (Bosch LSU 4.2?) in bellmouth:
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
|
02-07-2010, 11:02 AM | #27 | |
Former Vendor
Member#: 93646
Join Date: Aug 2005
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Vehicle:Many Track Records Let us help you go fast! |
Quote:
Tony |
|
02-07-2010, 02:16 PM | #28 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 10108
Join Date: Sep 2001
Chapter/Region:
NWIC
Location: Portland, OR
Vehicle:1874 Bicycle |
I didn't notice anything different in the mapping as far as O/L C/L fueling goes. You might think that Subaru might have tried CL fueling into boost.
|
02-07-2010, 08:46 PM | #29 | |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 140444
Join Date: Feb 2007
Chapter/Region:
NWIC
Location: Near Seattle, WA
Vehicle:05 Stage Free LGT ATP 3076, 6MT, AVO FMIC |
Quote:
There's a CL enrichment table that seems like it ought to allow staying in closed loop at AFRs well below 14.7, has anyone messed with it yet? For my car it showed up in Merchgod's last set of definitions. (Others may have gotten it sooner, others might not have it.) |
|
02-07-2010, 09:00 PM | #30 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 159682
Join Date: Sep 2007
Chapter/Region:
NESIC
Location: Maine
Vehicle:1995 WRX 2015 F150 |
The stock sensor, moved to the downpipe is accurate. I tuned both of my 02 WRXs that way. I had an aftermarket wideband, it read comparably to the stock sensor moved post turbo. The aftermarket one broke, I never got another one, no need. On the 02 wrx at least, you can rescale it to read down to 10.5 to 1 if you want to.
|
02-07-2010, 10:07 PM | #31 | |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 10108
Join Date: Sep 2001
Chapter/Region:
NWIC
Location: Portland, OR
Vehicle:1874 Bicycle |
Just 3/4 of a second into high loads is all at 14.7:1.
Quote:
|
|
02-07-2010, 10:19 PM | #32 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 198633
Join Date: Dec 2008
Chapter/Region:
NESIC
Location: MA
Vehicle:2004 WRX Black |
Couple questions. First, what is the equation for the regression you did on the data? What is the R value? How did you handle the x intercept? Ideally this would be zero. I don't know how the sensors will react in that area of the graph, but it will have an affect on the regression.
Last edited by van_dutch; 02-07-2010 at 10:19 PM. Reason: colors |
02-07-2010, 11:57 PM | #33 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 140444
Join Date: Feb 2007
Chapter/Region:
NWIC
Location: Near Seattle, WA
Vehicle:05 Stage Free LGT ATP 3076, 6MT, AVO FMIC |
Beats me. I just logged both, made a scatter plot, and used Excel's polynomial fit thing. I played with the poly order until it looked about right. That's 4th-order.
Why do you ask? |
02-08-2010, 02:23 AM | #34 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 198633
Join Date: Dec 2008
Chapter/Region:
NESIC
Location: MA
Vehicle:2004 WRX Black |
I'm an engineer and when I see data plotted without that kind of stuff, it rings bells. Playing around until it looks right doesn't really cut it. I'm just curious about the comparison. Without stuff like the equation and the R (really R^2) value, a comparison like that is pretty useless. You can draw numerous shapes that look right. Without an R^2 value, you have no way of judging how well a given curve fits. The equation is telling for a comparison of how they line up.
|
04-07-2010, 05:14 AM | #35 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 49979
Join Date: Dec 2003
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: MD, US
Vehicle:11 need a 2nd STI 08 black TA STI |
Quote:
|
|
04-07-2010, 11:54 AM | #36 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 232940
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: cold
|
The problem here is that you assume the aftermarket wideband must be the "true" value simply because it's aftermarket and because it's advertised as being more accurate. You really need to use a completely different instrument (5 gas analyzer) that isn't subjected to the same limitations of the normal wideband design.
FYI I've since been tuning with the factory wideband relocated post turbo. Seems to work well enough, and I will acquiesce on the location issue. I do trust it more when it is post turbo. |
02-28-2013, 10:26 AM | #37 | |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 268250
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Vehicle:2006 STi S204 |
Quote:
I have a JDM blob eye twinscroll. by default the a/f sensor is post turbo at the bellmouth of the downpipe. do i need to recalibrate the sensor voltage table before i use it to tune? thanks buddy! |
|
03-27-2014, 12:44 PM | #38 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 308314
Join Date: Jan 2012
Chapter/Region:
W. Canada
Location: Penticton BC
Vehicle:1999 Impreza RSTI Metallic White |
I know I'm resurecting an old thread here, I've got a 99RS that I've done a turbo kit on. I bought a Wideband O2 for tuning and a narrowband gauge for long term monitoring. I've been looking for the information on how to hook up the narrowband but cant find which wire off the sensor to splice. There are two white wires and one black one off the front O2 sensor. The rear has an extra grey wire. I just want to know which one sends the voltage signal to the ECU or how I would find that out. Pretty sure its not the black one. Anyone know this??
|
03-27-2014, 03:14 PM | #39 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 335445
Join Date: Oct 2012
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Ashland, VA
Vehicle:2012 WRX - BLK STIG Stg. 2 - 287whp/317wtq. |
Why not just leave the wideband in all the time? Mines been going strong for almost 2 years and 45000 miles. A new sensor for it being only 80 bucks if it does fail. It monitors flawlessly and most importantly under boost which your narrowband will not perform as well due to its limited range. My sensor is 3 inches from the turbo outlet on top off the dp with a slight offset from center to avoid the ac lines.
|
03-27-2014, 06:09 PM | #40 | |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 159682
Join Date: Sep 2007
Chapter/Region:
NESIC
Location: Maine
Vehicle:1995 WRX 2015 F150 |
Quote:
|
|
10-14-2020, 08:26 PM | #41 |
Scooby Specialist
|
Old thread.. but here is the result of testing I performed to compare the OEM front sensor in my 04 FXT to my MTX-L...
Last edited by TurboQueef; 05-06-2021 at 05:03 PM. |
10-14-2020, 09:50 PM | #42 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 157229
Join Date: Aug 2007
Chapter/Region:
RMIC
Location: SLC, Utah
Vehicle:2006 STi Wrapped Blue |
The oem front sensor is like a magnet that is attracted to 11.03. Although I wonder if some of the stickiness to 11.03 is due to smoothing. For example my wideband will show spikes above 11 occasionally, in areas that the oem front sensor can register, but those spikes do not ever show on the front sensor. I am guessing it is the difference between the raw signal from the wideband and the smoothed from the front sensor.
|
11-01-2020, 10:15 PM | #43 | ||
Scooby Guru
Member#: 140444
Join Date: Feb 2007
Chapter/Region:
NWIC
Location: Near Seattle, WA
Vehicle:05 Stage Free LGT ATP 3076, 6MT, AVO FMIC |
Quote:
http://www.n8rws.com/Final%20result.jpg I had basically the same result with my 05 LGT and PLX wideband. Not exactly identical, but close enough that the difference doesn't matter. Quote:
I spent a lot of time digging around in the ECU software for the reason that the readings bottom out like that, but couldn't find it. I'm guessing it stems from a limit somewhere in the hardware that sits in between the sensor and the software. |
||
11-11-2020, 04:41 PM | #44 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 310796
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: UT
Vehicle:05 obxt |
NSFW, if I were to permanently relocate my front o2 sensor behind the turbo without touching the current tune, would my closed loops long term fuel trims change? How about drivability?
car is an OBXT with a JMP VF52 and catted DP. |
11-15-2020, 08:02 AM | #45 | |
Scooby Specialist
|
Quote:
No change in driveability for me. I adjusted the calibration to get the AFR readings to match my Innovate gauge but it was close enough with OEM values in my opinion. One thing to consider however, is you will not see readings lower than 11.15 (and I could not overcome this with any settings in the tune). I use my OEM sensor in the down pipe for tuning my FXT. My target (on pump with meth/water) is 11.8 at hit to just over 12 at redline. |
|
11-19-2020, 01:08 AM | #46 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 140444
Join Date: Feb 2007
Chapter/Region:
NWIC
Location: Near Seattle, WA
Vehicle:05 Stage Free LGT ATP 3076, 6MT, AVO FMIC |
No issues for me either. The ECU didn't seem to notice the difference at all.
|
11-26-2020, 01:08 PM | #47 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 310796
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: UT
Vehicle:05 obxt |
Thanks for the replies. I will need to give it a go then.
|
11-27-2020, 12:55 PM | #48 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 501997
Join Date: May 2019
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: Atglen PA
Vehicle:2011 WRX gray |
Pretty much evey wide band I have used is less accurate then the OE in stock position in closed loop the closets one I have used was my AEM Uego even that was about .2 to .4 richer then the OEM one.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Front O2 sensor vs Rear O2 sensor (MY00 RS) | Jewbaru | Service & Maintenance | 3 | 07-29-2012 10:14 PM |
Front O2 Sensor, one NIB and the other used. 2 stock headers full. | 2ndGearFling | Engine/Power/Exhaust | 3 | 10-27-2008 05:41 PM |
FS: front O2 sensor, stock uppipe(7,000miles), stock front emblem | jimtweet | Private 'For Sale' Classifieds | 7 | 03-14-2005 09:01 AM |
does anyone need the stock front exhaust sensor off a... | motorswapsleeper | Legacy Forum | 3 | 08-03-2003 09:36 PM |
What type of sensor is the stock WRX O2 sensor? | Patrick Olsen | Factory 2.0L Turbo Powertrain (EJ Series Factory 2.0L Turbo) | 7 | 08-06-2002 05:17 PM |