|
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
07-01-2010, 04:28 PM | #1 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 93673
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rockford, IL
Vehicle:2004 WRX STi Java Black |
4G63 vs EJ25
I owned a 2004 STi when they first hit the shores and spent ~$10k in APS parts, labor, and tuning to hit the 400awhp mark. Second baby showed up and I had to sell it a year later.
Following summer I picked up a 2004 EVO and did some minor mods - CAI, TBE, fuel pump, and a tune and hit the 295awhp mark. Third baby showed up and I had to sell it a year later. Now I'm not having any more kids and want to pick up a another one but I'm having a struggle. This car will be a third, stored car, that will be modified heavily over the years. Still streetable, but I'd like to break the 600awhp mark. I spend a lot of time here and at evolutionm and over time I have found it shocking the difference in power gains mod for mod between the two. Here are some examples of stock turbo and motor evos making over 400awhp when running E85. http://forums.evolutionm.net/evo-dyn...rbo-hp-tq.html Looking here, many 35R EJ's are making just over 400awhp, some even on built motors. My point isn't to start a flame war, but to understand what mechanically is causing the difference? Is it soley turbo placement and engine layout? I did a search but the only thread was from 2002. I really love the subaru - the sound, refinement, look, tranny, etc. is awesome. However, I can improve the performance of the EVO for a fraction of the price. Thanks for any insight... Oh, and I'm not a big fan of the 4B11T/EVOX, so that is out. |
07-01-2010, 04:41 PM | #2 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 47646
Join Date: Nov 2003
Chapter/Region:
RMIC
Location: CO
Vehicle:0511 RallyBaja DGM Sedan |
This has been covered. A lot. do a search.
4G: Iron block = stronger I4 = better spool EJ: aluminum block, even semiclosed, isn't as strong H4 = LONG exhaust path to turbo as well as for IC More displacement is nice. But if you are going to build something.... either way its gonna be a built motor, so who cares about stock anything. STi tranny is better, other drivetrain parts are a wash. Buy what looks better. |
07-01-2010, 04:43 PM | #3 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 178811
Join Date: Apr 2008
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: MoCo
Vehicle:2011 White Corolla Over 400hp |
IIRC the 4G63 Evos have a 10cm^2 turbo hotside too. Whereas ours is what, 7cm^2?
|
07-01-2010, 04:46 PM | #4 | |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 133146
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SC
Vehicle:07 FPgreen 7.37@95 WRX VF39+E85 12.0, 121mph |
Quote:
The evo turbo is as big as 20G and is Twin Scroll. Give me a 20G and I promise my car will make 400whp on E85 and trap 126-128mph. Just like the fastest stock turbo EVOs. If someone is looking 500whp + and EVO is a must |
|
07-01-2010, 04:48 PM | #5 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 177840
Join Date: Apr 2008
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: New Jersey
Vehicle:2000 swapped RS White 330whp |
I think a evo 8 or 9 with a built 4g63 would be better suited for you.
The things you like about the Suby -Sound: with a 600whp subaru you will need equal length or twinscroll, so the boxer sound will most likely be gone. -Refinement/Look: they both look somewhat similar :P -Transmission: you would probably have to put straight cut in either. And for the price it would be way easier/cheaper to achieve your goals with a 4g63. |
07-01-2010, 04:54 PM | #6 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 33782
Join Date: Mar 2003
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Milton Keynes, UK
Vehicle:96 3MI Racing search FIRST, then PM!!! |
I-4 has nothing to do with spool.
Realistically these motors are VERY different, so much they aren't even worth comparing. Rod ratio, bore/stroke ratio, compression ratio, cylinder head port symmetry, block strength, combustion chamber shape, charge and discharge coefficients, flowrates, thermal efficiencies... due to layout of the engine however, they can have quicker spool and an even exhaust pulse much more easily than an EJ. Those are big for comparing the two motors in a street and race application. Their block in OEM form (still 85mm bore) allows for 40+psi boost where as a stock EJ257 is limited to a little over 30 or so. The 4G can run taller lift cams with more aggressive ramp rates. I.E. They can get easy power through lots of boost and big cams. Comparing stock turbos, the TD05HR-16G smokes any stock subie turbo...but that is a moot point as you're looking for the 600 realm. |
07-01-2010, 04:55 PM | #7 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 54060
Join Date: Feb 2004
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: N Jersey
Vehicle:Now: 16 FXT/04v8 207 Then:JRTuned fastest td04 |
I believe the only question in the OP is what causes the difference in mod for mod performance?
Answer: VE Mods you can close now. |
07-02-2010, 03:04 PM | #8 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 130444
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chandler
Vehicle:'85 AE86 GTS |
Quote:
Here's my list of reasons why the 46G3 is better (especially the last version): 1. VE (the rest of the list really all leads up to this) 2. Inline engines can run quite a bit leaner afr's safely (lean=power). 3. 4g63 can run considerably more boost safely due to an iron block and because it has better knock resistance. 4. This is complete guess but I'd imagine the ecu and knock control on the EVO is much more tuner friendly. 5. Mivec on the intake and exhaust cams. 6. Equal length exhaust manifold and twin scroll turbo from the factory, it also has a reasonably sized turbo. It really doesn't take a genius to figure it out. We're comparing a 2.0l to a 2.5l in factory trim and they make basically the same power. And when one starts adding power to both engines we all know the 2.0l in the EVO gets the edge. As oppositelock said the 4g63 simply has better VE; therefore, it's a better engine. |
|
07-02-2010, 03:26 PM | #9 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 211974
Join Date: May 2009
Chapter/Region:
SWIC
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Vehicle:2004 WRX STi PTE6466 2002 Sentra SE-R Spec V |
Quote:
Also the MIVEC is only on Evo 9s and is fairly useless past 500hp. I know this because I have a buddy whos Evo 9 MR is currently at Buschur Racing in Ohio getting a Built 2L engine, PT6262 (although he has a HTA86 on order), complete 1000hp fuel system, advanced ignition system, Shepherd Stg 3 trans and transfer case, and drag racing coilover setup. He should be turning about 700hp on 93 pump. He is running a 280 cam and they can't advance it very far and barely makes a difference in spool or power. Some people even disable it. |
|
07-02-2010, 03:31 PM | #10 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 218971
Join Date: Jul 2009
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: West Chester, PA
Vehicle:2007 WRX Black |
Quote:
To the OP, if you are gunning for an Evo, stick with the 5spd. I would look for an SSL SE, or the version with the sunroof. |
|
07-03-2010, 02:44 AM | #11 | ||
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 211974
Join Date: May 2009
Chapter/Region:
SWIC
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Vehicle:2004 WRX STi PTE6466 2002 Sentra SE-R Spec V |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
07-02-2010, 03:32 PM | #12 | |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 133146
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SC
Vehicle:07 FPgreen 7.37@95 WRX VF39+E85 12.0, 121mph |
Quote:
funny..... The fastest stock ECU EVO is an EVO 9 with mivec, it is also the fastest on drag radials. 8s on the stock ECU, 9.0 on drag radials http://forums.evolutionm.net/drag-ra...ck-ecu-8s.html http://forums.evolutionm.net/drag-ra...evo-8-9-a.html check out my post on the first thread, they made fun of the subies, but is funny because is true |
|
07-05-2010, 11:04 AM | #13 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 92003
Join Date: Jul 2005
Chapter/Region:
SCIC
Location: Tatooine
Vehicle:04 bicycle! |
Quote:
|
|
07-05-2010, 11:41 AM | #14 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 33458
Join Date: Feb 2003
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: PA
Vehicle:Your BOV sounds lame 93 RX7+09 Forester |
|
07-01-2010, 05:00 PM | #15 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 249620
Join Date: Jun 2010
Chapter/Region:
South East
Location: florida
Vehicle:2007 sti urban gray |
It really is comparing apples to oranges. If you really want cheaper hp get a dsm gen1 and go old school. I love the 4g63 but I prefer the fit, finish, and feel of the sti over the evo. just my opinion.
|
07-01-2010, 05:06 PM | #16 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 210061
Join Date: Apr 2009
Chapter/Region:
BAIC
Location: Elk Grove, CA
|
Eh.. Spent 10 years in the DSM/Evo Arena.. Now I drive an 11 second scoob..
4g63>ej.. Stronger block, better flowing head, greater VE.. Etc etc etc.. But really who cares? Either route can net similiar results built properly.. Until you start to cross that 1000 hp threshold.. There are plenty of mid 1k HP 4g63's.. Not so many ej's.. So as long as you arent shooting for 1500 hp.. Again.. Who cares? Pick the vehicle that suits you better.. Personally I love my Suby.. |
07-01-2010, 05:27 PM | #17 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 211974
Join Date: May 2009
Chapter/Region:
SWIC
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Vehicle:2004 WRX STi PTE6466 2002 Sentra SE-R Spec V |
I would just sell my STi and get a 03/04 mustang cobra and for 10k get a 3.4L whipple supercharger and all the supporting mods and be churning out 800 ponies on E85. Just my opinion lol. Also a great deal more reliable.
|
07-01-2010, 06:27 PM | #18 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 207021
Join Date: Mar 2009
Chapter/Region:
NWIC
Location: Newberg, Oregon
Vehicle:99 OBS |
^^Dont do this.
|
07-01-2010, 07:25 PM | #19 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 128760
Join Date: Oct 2006
Chapter/Region:
RMIC
Location: Over there>
Vehicle:2017 STI Silver |
^^^ what he said.
|
07-01-2010, 07:33 PM | #20 | |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 99102
Join Date: Oct 2005
Chapter/Region:
South East
Location: Jax, FL
Vehicle:17 BMW M2 Long Beach Blue 6MT |
Quote:
power per dollar a v8 is the way to go... also take a look at a c5 zo6 ...you can get them for about 20-25k if you look around. A zo6 handles pretty good and will rape bolt on sti's/evos ...trust me, ive seen first hand over 100 times |
|
07-01-2010, 07:45 PM | #21 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 207021
Join Date: Mar 2009
Chapter/Region:
NWIC
Location: Newberg, Oregon
Vehicle:99 OBS |
^^Apparently you dont realize his question was not about how sweet v8 supercharged whipple nipple blah blah mustangs are. So lets keep it on topic.
|
07-14-2010, 03:52 PM | #22 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 127907
Join Date: Oct 2006
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Minnesota
Vehicle:99RS 9.54 @ 146 2.65L & FOBIA fab & S374 |
I have 25K into my 2.5 Franken build and I can assure you a zo6 will be in my rearview. Just buy an old car, build it piece by piece, mod by mod till you get to your desired goal.
|
07-01-2010, 07:59 PM | #23 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 152984
Join Date: Jul 2007
Chapter/Region:
SCIC
Location: san diego
Vehicle:2004 jewbaru jewbuilt, polish tuned |
Quote:
if you want massive power and reliability the 03-04 cobra is awesome, and after the maximum motorsports grip kit, brembos, and some 17x11 with 315/40/17 all the way around, your handling and braking will not be an issue once again its all about preference i'd take the 4g63 and stroke it |
|
07-02-2010, 07:39 AM | #24 | ||
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 122980
Join Date: Aug 2006
Chapter/Region:
South East
Location: Raleigh, NC
Vehicle:2010 F150, 2013 CX-5 92 Miata 15 TTF/PTF/E3 |
Quote:
I assume he wants this car to be functional at some point, rather than just taking up parking space. Sure, they can, any Subaru based application just takes $texas to get there. Quote:
If I were looking for a 600whp garage queen, this is the ticket. |
||
07-03-2010, 10:25 AM | #25 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 236927
Join Date: Jan 2010
Chapter/Region:
NESIC
Location: Oakville CT
Vehicle:2015 BRZ 86 GL Hatch 1984 BRAT |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
4g63 vs the EJ | e[tx] | Built Motor Discussion | 15 | 06-10-2009 04:28 PM |
EJ25 sohc vs EJ25/22 Frankenmotor | jamesbissland | Subaru Conversions | 3 | 09-30-2006 05:11 PM |
EJ22 vs. EJ25 | advance | Normally Aspirated Powertrain | 9 | 05-25-2001 07:35 AM |
EJ20 vs EJ25 (Turbo vs Turbo) | MagicMT | Factory 2.0L Turbo Powertrain (EJ Series Factory 2.0L Turbo) | 11 | 04-23-2001 11:52 AM |
Putting the EJ20/22 turbo vs EJ25 turbo debate to rest! | Andre Vandenberg | Technical Forum Archive | 42 | 06-04-2000 07:53 PM |