|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 73805
Join Date: Nov 2004
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]()
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 88758
Join Date: Jun 2005
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: MAIC
Vehicle:2019 Mustang PP2 |
![]() Hopefully they LinkedIn an engine team that can figure out the 2k rattles and typewriter tick.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
n00b Moderator
Moderator Member#: 4263
Join Date: Feb 2001
Chapter/Region:
SCIC
Location: Encinitas
|
![]() ^
Yeah. For some reason, I give mine a pass because it's an American car. Also, anyone placing bets that the next gen Mustang will be bigger and heavier than the S550? Put $100,000 down to win $1.00. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 504432
Join Date: Jul 2019
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
|
![]() Quote:
It’s insane. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 340456
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Vehicle:2013 Impreza |
![]() It needs to be smaller and lighter - but that's never going to happen. If that was a part of the reason for the S650's delay, it would give hope to those who detest the size and weight gain trend in modern pony cars but, it's doubtful.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 73805
Join Date: Nov 2004
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 183032
Join Date: Jun 2008
Chapter/Region:
NESIC
Location: CT
Vehicle:RWD Camry Pull me over red |
![]() Putting the mustang on a diet would be nice, but the cars are built to a price point, so unless the the platform is lighter than the old platform and/or they shorten the wheelbase I'm not holding my breath. Maybe it gets an aluminum or high strength steel roof, aluminum fenders & hood (not sure if the current one is already using aluminum in any of those spots or not).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 88758
Join Date: Jun 2005
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: MAIC
Vehicle:2019 Mustang PP2 |
![]() I do as well. I figure a small V8 revving beyond 7k RPM's and still giving 20+MPG is going to make some noise. But it does leave a lot to be desired if you spec one out in the mid 40's-to low 50's.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 11349
Join Date: Oct 2001
Vehicle:2016 Mustang GT Blue |
![]() I'm sure I'd love the extra hp the latest version provides, but man I still love my '16 GT. Too big, too fat? For a (435hp, 6spd, NA-V8) GT weekend car, I find those complaints childish.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 132389
Join Date: Nov 2006
Chapter/Region:
BAIC
Location: SF Bay Area
|
![]() Going from S197 into S550, focus groups didn't want a smaller Mustang. People, in general, didn't want a smaller Mustang, in fact, they wanted more room inside.
GM didn't listen to people, shrank Camaro, and look at them now... The best we can hope for is a S650 that is not gaining any weight. Another one is Challenger, its bones are heavy and it needs a new platform bad. But, the moment FCA makes it smaller inside is the moment they start loosing customers. Same with Charger. Some people like 'em big and roomy. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 504432
Join Date: Jul 2019
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
|
![]() Smaller outside doesn't mean smaller inside. It's not like there's zero room for more efficient use of space.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 132389
Join Date: Nov 2006
Chapter/Region:
BAIC
Location: SF Bay Area
|
![]() Quote:
They cut into the dashboard to improve room around the knees for instance. All I'm saying is that there's an existing customer base for these cars; some manus may exercise caution before making drastic dimension/size changes; some other manus may not. A smaller/lighter Mustang with a good amount of room inside is a very good thing but it's up to Ford to find out what people really want. Or maybe it's worth exploring the introduction a newer/lighter model altogether, maybe an affordable Ford GT of sorts. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 504432
Join Date: Jul 2019
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
|
![]() For sure. I think a BRZ sized Mustang would go over like a wet fart with most Mustang buyers.
However, at 188 inches that's a really big car for it's interior space. A new Outback is 191 inches for reference. A modern Civic Sedan is under 183 inches. The Mustang is BIG and it's not like it's huge inside. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 64665
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: WA
Vehicle:1997 Toyota Blurple |
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 73805
Join Date: Nov 2004
|
![]() ![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 379605
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Peabody, MA
Vehicle:2017 Civic Sport 2012 Outback 2.5 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 194216
Join Date: Nov 2008
Chapter/Region:
W. Canada
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Vehicle:2022 Fast POS |
![]() 190" inches is average these days. The current Accord is over 196" long.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Papi Chulo
Moderator Member#: 53794
Join Date: Jan 2004
Chapter/Region:
RMIC
Location: Boner kill city
Vehicle:... 2017 BMW M2 2017 F-150 |
![]() Hybrid setup? That's going to be one heavy pony.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 183032
Join Date: Jun 2008
Chapter/Region:
NESIC
Location: CT
Vehicle:RWD Camry Pull me over red |
![]() Quote:
compact sedans with longitudinal layout: IS350 is 185.4 Q50 is 189.6 CT4-V is 187.2-187.6 Compact coupes with longitudinal layout: Mustang is 188.3 Camaro is 188.3-190.2 (longer length might be for the aero pack cars?) Compacts with transverse layout (WRX is longitudinal, but a Flat 4 so shorter than a V6/V8) WRX is 180.9 civic is 179-184 (hatch vs. sedan) mazda3 is 175.6-183.5 (hatch vs sedan) All Mustangs: 1st gen 64-66 181.6 67-68 183.6 69-70 187.5 71-73 189.5 2nd/M-II - 175.0 3rd/Fox - 179.6 4th/SN95 - 181.5 5th/s197 - 188.0 6th/S550 - 188.3 7th gen/S650 will get bigger still, maybe Ford will hit the reset button again so we can have a truly compact mustang. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 194216
Join Date: Nov 2008
Chapter/Region:
W. Canada
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Vehicle:2022 Fast POS |
![]() There is nothing compact about a Mustang.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 139693
Join Date: Feb 2007
Vehicle:Dura ngo 95 horrorshow |
![]() Bertha is the in thing right now. GR Yaris? Nope, too small for Murica! You get the large combo meal sized deal instead. Mustang, bigger, heavier. Pretty soon the current “it’s light at 2800 pounds” is gonna be “wow it’s light at 3800 pounds.”
I mean geez the M3P weighs as much as my truck. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 73805
Join Date: Nov 2004
|
![]() ![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 379605
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Peabody, MA
Vehicle:2017 Civic Sport 2012 Outback 2.5 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 73805
Join Date: Nov 2004
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 528403
Join Date: Jan 2022
Chapter/Region:
NWIC
Location: NorCal
Vehicle:22' WR-HikingShoe 17' F250, 18' Q5, 18' CRV |
![]() All Ford has to do is adopt something like the Emission-less Hydrogen 5 liter, 8 cyl, 455bhp new engine block designed by Toyota and Yamaha and the Muscle car will remain alive. Will they do so? Nawh, theyre going to cash out of Lithium fad until the public proves that the strain on the powergrid is too much, thus forcing companies to go back to a combustion set up.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|