|
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-24-2007, 06:13 PM | #1 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 90539
Join Date: Jul 2005
Chapter/Region:
South East
Location: SWLA
Vehicle:My BOV goes COVFEFE! |
new ej22t closed deck shortblock or new 2.5 sti shortblock?
I am trying to decide on a new shortblock, one that will be durable through my process of upgrades, up until I get things running smoothly. My car is a 95 with obd1 and the ecu isn't very smart. It is running a 2.5 with 1.8 parameters. I want to start with these components and use my emanage and possibly a rrfpr to start:
-98 2.5 dohc heads -stock 06 wrx turbo and tmic -stock 06 wrx down and uppipes -98 2.5 intake manifold? I am sure the engine will run fairly well as long as the heads are compatible with either block. The ej22t shortblock with all gaskets is actually more expensive than the ej25 sti shortblock with all gaskets. Is the ej22t actually more desirable? I realize it is closed deck and may be helpful running higher boost, but starting out with .3liters more is already a plus, and aren't the 2.5 sti internals manufactured to better tolerances? Just trying to get things together.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
|
02-24-2007, 06:21 PM | #2 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 113096
Join Date: Apr 2006
Chapter/Region:
SWIC
Location: vegas..
Vehicle:06 sti |
go with the 257 (sti shortblock) and install some better pistons before install... your right the extra displacement will help
|
02-24-2007, 06:36 PM | #3 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 94903
Join Date: Aug 2005
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: NY
Vehicle:1996 Impreza Wagon! Satin Black |
|
02-24-2007, 10:14 PM | #4 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 66739
Join Date: Jul 2004
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Medina, Ohio
Vehicle:2002 WRX wagon silver |
the 2.5 is capable of 400hp easily. get a new shortblock. not a 13+year old (new) shorty. even tho your OBD1(dosen't matter really).
and the extra displacement WILL help regardless of what some people think. especially when you up the boost, or get a bigger snail. ditch the old, go with the gold! i have a JDM STI swapped L. and i wish it was as driveable in the low RPM's as the 2.5's are. if i toast my shorty, thats what i will do. --keith |
02-24-2007, 10:27 PM | #5 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 67127
Join Date: Jul 2004
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Belleville, MI
Vehicle:3.3 I <3/h8 my GF3 1.8-2.5-2.2-2.5-2.2-3.3 |
Go for the 2.5
Odds are you'll never push the 40lbs or so of boost that would warrant a fully closed block. The extra displacement WILL help in all situations. The only reason not to go with more displacement is if you cant afford it. (and sure, rigoli can make ****loads of power out of a 2.0... but they do it at 10,000rpm, which you will never see) |
02-24-2007, 11:17 PM | #6 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 94903
Join Date: Aug 2005
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: NY
Vehicle:1996 Impreza Wagon! Satin Black |
|
02-24-2007, 11:48 PM | #7 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 137105
Join Date: Jan 2007
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: midwest
|
build a used ej22t with forged internals. You can even use a 2.5L crank and have 2.35L closed deck with piston squirters. Your goals will always change. Better to over build now.
|
02-24-2007, 11:51 PM | #8 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 94903
Join Date: Aug 2005
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: NY
Vehicle:1996 Impreza Wagon! Satin Black |
the point i am trying to make is that displacement isnt the main thing. the reason why the ej22t doesnt make as much low end is because it has a lower compression ratio. displacement isnt much in our forced induction world. You can make just as much power with a 1.5 liter as you can with a 2.5. just as long as you build it right.
|
02-25-2007, 01:21 AM | #9 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 93248
Join Date: Aug 2005
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Chicago
Vehicle:95 20g powered gc8 PPG'd yO! & is250 AWD |
funny to see 2.5 people acting like domestic owners.. hell even a 1.8T L made power.. that .3 liters will make very minimal gain to the point were it gets irrelevant(maybe a lil drivability differences) but to say the 2.5 is god and its always better is just ignorant. 2.2's can make as much power as 2.5's. if you wanted tq.. then u shouldnt be driving a subaru..
|
02-25-2007, 02:30 AM | #10 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 80663
Join Date: Jan 2005
Chapter/Region:
SWIC
Location: Glendale, AZ
Vehicle:2005 STi |
|
02-25-2007, 02:36 AM | #11 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 140371
Join Date: Feb 2007
Chapter/Region:
NWIC
Location: Oregon
Vehicle:1997 impreza light blue |
from what I've read and seen in the subaru shop I worked at the internals on the 2.2t are stronger. Not only that but since there is less stroke there is also less stress on the reciprocating assembly. Either way you go you'll want to replace the pistons as I believe they are cast aluminum in both cases. I'm not sure the price but you could consider getting a crawford closed deck 2.5 if you want something bombproof, well bomb resistant. I have seen a 2.5 block with 25psi crack a cylinder because of stress on the open block.
the big question is are you going to have enough power for it to matter either way?unless it's a drag car I personally wouldn't want more than 300whp, but then again I'm cheap and like my stuff to last and be streetable. |
02-25-2007, 06:06 AM | #12 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 107569
Join Date: Feb 2006
Chapter/Region:
NWIC
Location: Vancouver, WA
Vehicle:1998 Forester S SRP |
Get the ej257 block. It is GOD! I actually went from the ej22t to the ej257 short block on a stock head setup with a gt35r. Since it's my daily driver and has been for a while now, I have noticed quite the difference in drivability with the larger motor. Off boost torque is much better. In boost it is hard to notice a ton of difference but the extra displacement still makes a little difference.
i have done many many many four cylinder high horsepower engines and by car more displacement is always better if you plan on driving the motor. To make smaller displacement perform you have to rev the hell out of it. The down fall of Subarus is there crappy heads. Even built heads don't flow like an EVO or MR2 turbo. for smooth high revs you probably don't want the ej257 if you plan to build everything and race it. The ej22t motor with built wrx heads seems to be a good match. It makes for a nice smooth motor not the american STI style of driving. |
02-25-2007, 10:21 AM | #13 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 5030
Join Date: Mar 2001
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Martinsburg, WV, USA
Vehicle:1999 Legacy 2.5GT 19 Audi RS3, 13 Armada |
I don't think anyone has ever said anything bad about Subaru heads accept for the older 2.2 turbo heads found on the old turbo legacy.
Ive done a lot of research, comparison, and made the choice to fully build a 2.2t motor. My shortblock is finished and has a 2.5 Phase I crank, Pauter Phase I 2.5 Rods, and Wiseco .030 over pistons. It should be a stout 2.4 thats capable of withstanding 9000 rpm and well over 500 hp. To be totally honest it was a very close decision between the STi 2.5 and the 2.2. The determining factor was that my goal is above 500hp and revs over 8000 rpm. If I was shooting for around the 450-500hp range I would have hands down gone for the 2.5. Its way cheaper, easier, and less hastle to use the 2.5sti block which is fully capable of 450-500hp without touching the internals. The 2.5 block will cost you about $1500. I found a great deal on my 2.2 shortblock ($500 for the complete motor) but after the motor work and build parts its costing me $2200. Still a great deal when compared to the Axis line of shortblocks. I think a comparable motor setup to mine started at $4500 and went up from there. If your curious my heads are Phase I 2.5 DOHC heads with TWE Stage III Cams, and their Shim Under Bucket kit that includes stiffer springs and titanium retainers. I'm going to see how this setup does without a valve job or port and polish. I really wanted to preserve as much low end response as I could while still reaching for big numbers up top. When I get the motor together and my Legacy this Spring/Summer we'll see how it does. What are your [realistic] power goals and what are you planning to [realistically] use the car for? Brad |
02-25-2007, 10:30 AM | #14 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 78080
Join Date: Dec 2004
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: oc, NY
Vehicle:2001 impreza red biatch |
257 sucks get the ej22t if its new, and if its not get it anyway and swap in new pistons, cheaper then a 257 and better for revs. .3 liters wont make a difference.
|
02-25-2007, 10:34 AM | #15 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 33782
Join Date: Mar 2003
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Milton Keynes, UK
Vehicle:96 3MI Racing search FIRST, then PM!!! |
the extra displacement and low end grunt from the stroke will be appreciated a lot more unless you are making a high revving boost fed machine
|
02-25-2007, 10:35 AM | #16 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 38469
Join Date: Jun 2003
Chapter/Region:
NESIC
Vehicle:07 LGT spec-b Crystal Grey Metallic |
im rocking my 2.2 for a while longer and then I too will be getting a sti crank and pistons w/ correct pin offset for a stroker engine. I couldn't do that w/ a 2.5. And I'll take the stroke and revability over a 2.5 anyday.
I think Brad pretty much nailed it w/ his post. |
02-25-2007, 11:18 AM | #17 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 18384
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Seattle 'burb (Kirkland)
Vehicle:2004 STi: 580 AWHP Java Black Pearl |
While it's true that you can make power with small displacement motors, there's some interesting math involved.
Power is produced by many things, but three major ones are: -Displacement -Boost -Revs You can replace one with the other, but you have to make compromises. Once you max out boost, you have to start looking at the others. High revs get quickly diminishing returns since it's harder & harder to get each additional 1k rpm... the stresses on the motor mount quickly. Displacement is amazing. I have a spreadsheet that takes a bunch of variables, the above three, plus volumetric efficiency, fuel used, etc., and calculates potential horsepower. It's amazing what displacement does to the equation. That's why you can easily get 1000hp out of a boosted small block chevy. Anyway, I'd start with reasonable displacement and then go for strength, boost and RPMs. In my case, I had a used EJ22T bored & sleeved to 2.5L with an RPM capability of 8,000. Lots of potential. However, it can get pricey to do this sort of work, so if budget is a factor and your future goals don't reach much more than 450whp, starting with an STi block is just fine. Russ |
02-25-2007, 11:55 AM | #18 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 94903
Join Date: Aug 2005
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: NY
Vehicle:1996 Impreza Wagon! Satin Black |
Quote:
I could have a ****load of displacement but without compression you're out of luck. You take an ej22t and step the compression up and it will have the low end that you want. There is a lot involved. First you have to look at the turbo you're using. If the turbo is say a twin scroll gt40r, I'd raise the CR a bit because you KNOW that the low end is gonna suck due to being off boost for so long. There are too many factors here to consider. .3 liters isnt going to give you that much of a difference unless your CR is also higher. btw....a chevy 350 is equal to 5.73 liters and they tend to be higher compression engines, my best friend has a 13.8:1 block in his monte carlo right no. Thats why they can make 1000hp easily, not just the displacement. You can't talk about one thing in a motor being the "draw back" without talking about everything else involved. |
|
02-25-2007, 12:52 PM | #19 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 18384
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Seattle 'burb (Kirkland)
Vehicle:2004 STi: 580 AWHP Java Black Pearl |
As I said, there are compromises... Boost is similar to compression in that it gets more air into a designated space. You add compression, you get low end torque, but lose the amount of boost you can build and ultimate power. You can also raise the compression of a 2.5L block if you want.
High compression is why a Small Block Chevy can make 1000hp so easily?! Nope. A turbo Chevy Small Block will certainly not have anything near 13.8 compression. You know they'd build it for a turbo, with much lower compression. In addition to little turbo motors, I'm also a big V8 kinda guy and subscribe to Hot Rod Magazine. They recently had an article on a daily driven 1000hp Small Block. Compression Ratio? 8.96:1. Some folks like the JDM 2L motors for they're revability. If that's what you're into, more power to you. However, I wouldn't choose low displacement when there's not really a drawback to more. I guess gas mileage would be one. On the other hand, you gain quicker spool, more torque and more potential power, all else being somewhat equal. Inaccurate example, but actual case: A buddy of mine had his 2.0L w/GT30R tuned by the same shop that tuned my 2.5L FP Green. He made the same power as I did at a higher RPM. A GT30R should have made 50hp more. Granted, there are a lot of variables there, but that's still quite a difference. If anyone is interested in playing with numbers, the spreadsheet is located here: Turbo Selection Spreadsheet. It's built from equations found in the turbo info section of Garret's web site. Yellow cells are parameters you can adjust depending on your motor needs. Gray cells are less commonly adjusted parameters for innate motor characteristics. Green cells are results. Notice when you change the displacement, how the required boost changes. Example: At 8000rpm, a 2.2 Liter requires 33.1psi for 550hp. A 2.5 liter motor requires 27.3psi. Pretty significant. |
02-25-2007, 02:21 PM | #20 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 94903
Join Date: Aug 2005
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: NY
Vehicle:1996 Impreza Wagon! Satin Black |
I never said high compression was the whole reason that they can achieve 1000hp and ive seen supercharged guys still running upawrds of 10:1. They have 5.7 liters or more, which is well over twice the displacement of a ej25.
So if you do the math. 5.7 small black is 3.2 liters more than an ej25. ej25 is .3 liters greater than the ej22. There's a huuuuuge difference. 2slofouru just go for whatever you think will be best for you. and by that i mean financially and also reliability. You can build great power and have good driveability with either block. One option for the ej22t is the stroker motor if you're looking for more torque. It all depends on if this is going to be a daily driver, a track car or whatnot. |
02-25-2007, 10:50 PM | #21 | |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 140371
Join Date: Feb 2007
Chapter/Region:
NWIC
Location: Oregon
Vehicle:1997 impreza light blue |
Quote:
ok so I'm also a big v8 fan and I found a couple things not exactly true. In most cases a larger motor, all else being equal most importantly hp#, will get better gas mileage. Also 8.96:1 seems to me pretty "high", at least for a 1000hp turbo small block, as they ran 8.5 without forced induction through most of the 70's and 80's from the factory. One thing to improve low end response and torque is to have the seat cut at a lower angle. In a SBC stock valve seat angle is 45deg, if you lower this to 30deg at .050' lift the seat will be open .008" more. Doesn't seem like much but really makes a noticeable difference. Remember, all good engine builders agree that the most important detail to making power in an engine is cylinder head flow. So don't ponder too long on the block choice. Ok now a question...anyone use the 2.2 crank in a 2.5 block? I've always liked big bore/small stroke combos as there is better revability with less valve shrouding. |
|
02-26-2007, 12:31 AM | #22 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 9861
Join Date: Sep 2001
Chapter/Region:
RMIC
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Vehicle:1999 2.35 RS-T w/NOS Hybrid Rally Blue Pearl |
The whole point is moot anyway- there are no longer any new ej22t blocks available.
|
02-26-2007, 01:27 AM | #23 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 94903
Join Date: Aug 2005
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: NY
Vehicle:1996 Impreza Wagon! Satin Black |
|
02-26-2007, 02:21 AM | #24 | |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 90539
Join Date: Jul 2005
Chapter/Region:
South East
Location: SWLA
Vehicle:My BOV goes COVFEFE! |
Quote:
/\Go to subaruproparts.com. To everyone else, thanks for the replies. I am still as confused as ever but will eventually piece it together with your help. I understand the low end torque thing, I've had three turbo 280zx's and the low end torque was great, partly because of the inline six and 2.8 liter displacement. Ultimately overall horsepower is my goal, whether it takes higher rpms to get it isn't important to me, as long as I can mod my ecu for it, but that will surely add a lot to the cost of the project, and complicate tuning even more with my lame ecu. If I didn't live in the swamp, I'd get a used ej22t engine and do some upgrade work in the piston department and maybe overbore it to around 2.4, but the local builders are all domesticated. It would probably be an equally good idea to buy a used ej22t and upgrade pistons and displacement a little or buy a 2.5sti shorblock new, as far as cost is concerned in the long run. Wow, brain is smoking now.. |
|
02-26-2007, 03:03 AM | #25 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 18384
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Seattle 'burb (Kirkland)
Vehicle:2004 STi: 580 AWHP Java Black Pearl |
Quote:
8.96 CR isn't that high for a 6.5 liter motor making 1000hp. Using the spreadsheet I posted the link to, you'd see that the car would need about 15lbs of boost to get there at 7000rpm... pretty mild and easily handled with a 9:1 CR. And besides... you can't really think of Power and the cars of the 70's and 80's together... those were the dead years and they were striving for economy. Look a bit earlier... to the 60's for motors with high compression ratios. Regarding the availability of EJ22T's... there were quite a few early 90's Turbo Legacy's made... so lots used motors out there. That's where mine came from. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
new stock usdm 2.5 sti shortblock | rapturem3 | Private 'Wanted' Classifieds | 0 | 06-17-2009 10:01 AM |
WTB 2.5 Sti shortblock or longblock | TUNERwRX | Private 'Wanted' Classifieds | 3 | 02-12-2006 06:55 PM |
WTB: 2.5L shortblock or built 2.5 | aftermathWRX | Private 'Wanted' Classifieds | 1 | 05-19-2005 03:29 PM |
2 2,5 STI shortblocks and Gaskets | Maecky | Private 'Wanted' Classifieds | 1 | 05-06-2005 03:17 PM |
Best base for 330-350whp daily driver. 2.2 legacy or 2.5 STI shortblock? | Davenow | Factory 2.0L Turbo Powertrain (EJ Series Factory 2.0L Turbo) | 16 | 06-06-2004 01:01 AM |