|
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-23-2018, 05:47 PM | #2626 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 47143
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Toronto
|
I am saying that using a dyno graph doesn't show time or real life driving situations (such as the "race" that he lost) and that actual acceleration time data, or time to boost / torque etc would be more beneficial if he was trying to show the differences between wrapped and unwrapped (all else being equal of course). It isn't normal to drive in a high gear at low rpm and then care about how quickly you would accelerate because downshifting and using more axle torque is far more beneficial, that's my point.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
|
10-23-2018, 09:06 PM | #2627 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 468393
Join Date: May 2017
Location: PDX OREGON
Vehicle:2017 STI |
Quote:
Either way you choose to express it clearly shows increased energy. One metric would not be improved without the other. |
|
10-24-2018, 12:50 PM | #2628 | |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 33782
Join Date: Mar 2003
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Milton Keynes, UK
Vehicle:96 3MI Racing search FIRST, then PM!!! |
Quote:
And yes, the mechanical advantage of a lower gear is phenomimal in comparison. Also why I like the destroked engines turning 9-10k. |
|
10-24-2018, 01:27 PM | #2629 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 395275
Join Date: Jul 2014
Chapter/Region:
RMIC
Location: Fort Lupton, CO
Vehicle:2012 STi SWP |
Pretty sure yamaha and my car spool the same or very close. No reason to get a 6758 over a 7163 anymore.
his 6758, .85 AR, TMIC with ELH, Turbosmart 4 port Mine 7163, .85 AR, FMIC with stock header, EWG. |
10-24-2018, 01:40 PM | #2630 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 80649
Join Date: Jan 2005
Chapter/Region:
South East
Location: Columbia, SC
Vehicle:2000 2.5 Auto-X RSTi Sparkly |
The AR is key between those two turbos. Since the 7163 isn't available in the .64 AR but the 6758 is if you want quicker spool/response the 6758 in the smaller AR wins, but will make 75ish WHP less than a 7163 at full song. The difference in AR size is roughly 400 rpm of total spool time and about .1 seconds of transient time based on data logs between two cars.
I've long said if I could get a 7163 in 64 AR I'd have done it, but in the end higher CR, TS, and shorter manifold length will solve the issue. |
10-24-2018, 01:50 PM | #2631 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 395275
Join Date: Jul 2014
Chapter/Region:
RMIC
Location: Fort Lupton, CO
Vehicle:2012 STi SWP |
i totally forgot you can get the 6758 in a .64 AR. that makes sense.
|
10-24-2018, 02:02 PM | #2632 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 73932
Join Date: Nov 2004
Chapter/Region:
RMIC
Location: Denver
Vehicle:2005 STi EFR 6758 04 S2000 EFR 7064 |
Quote:
7163 - .85 AR, FMIC with stock header, EWG, BW EBCS. 6758 - .85 AR, TMIC with ELH, Turbosmart 2-port, BW EBCS I don't have a comparison with single AVCS on the 7163 to give a direct comparison. I got the .85 hot side as the low end torque just kills ****... I'm over 3,500 RPM whenever I want to play anyway, so the .64 was not really a benefit to me. I originally got the 6758 to limit myself on my motor, which is just pistons and head studs. Now that I live up at high altitude, I wish I had gotten the 7163. I am actually throwing my car on the dyno on Friday, so it'll be nice to have numbers. Was supposed to have Waddlz car on the dyno too, but... DAMN YOU! This is my 6758 running through the gears. Last edited by yamahaSHO; 10-24-2018 at 03:43 PM. |
|
10-24-2018, 02:30 PM | #2633 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 395275
Join Date: Jul 2014
Chapter/Region:
RMIC
Location: Fort Lupton, CO
Vehicle:2012 STi SWP |
lol. Don't rehash that. I'm still not happy
|
10-24-2018, 05:18 PM | #2634 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 395734
Join Date: Jul 2014
|
I typically drive in 2500-4000 rpm range as this is my daily. Losing the 400 rpms of spool would make me sad I think.
|
10-25-2018, 12:20 AM | #2635 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 468393
Join Date: May 2017
Location: PDX OREGON
Vehicle:2017 STI |
YAMA- where do you plan to post your dyno results? I want to see
|
10-25-2018, 01:19 PM | #2636 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 33782
Join Date: Mar 2003
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Milton Keynes, UK
Vehicle:96 3MI Racing search FIRST, then PM!!! |
I'm just excited I got time to finally weld up my intercooler piping last night. Now bumper beam, downpipe and EWG pluming and I should be able to fire it up.
Really excited to compare the .64 and .85 6758 and then the .85 7163 on the same engine, same car. |
10-25-2018, 01:22 PM | #2637 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 468393
Join Date: May 2017
Location: PDX OREGON
Vehicle:2017 STI |
Super excited to see your car and results!
|
10-25-2018, 03:52 PM | #2638 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 33782
Join Date: Mar 2003
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Milton Keynes, UK
Vehicle:96 3MI Racing search FIRST, then PM!!! |
Yeah, I'm curious to see how the oddball 2.1 with the staggered OEM cams will do. Ported heads and big primary tubing will probably make it laggy. Topped off with a too large FMIC....it's a conglomerate of spare parts
Ditched the TMIC which I was originally doing because a friend talked me out of it. At least made a short hot side pipe but the hotside I'd already had made up from my GC, so just carried it over. I'll probably change it when I go to my new manifold. |
10-25-2018, 06:59 PM | #2639 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 468393
Join Date: May 2017
Location: PDX OREGON
Vehicle:2017 STI |
Quote:
After I get my built motor in and tuned, if I'm happy with it, the plan is (because I know I won't be able to simply enjoy it ) to rotate and route the pipes super short like your hot pipe is. |
|
10-25-2018, 08:42 PM | #2640 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 73932
Join Date: Nov 2004
Chapter/Region:
RMIC
Location: Denver
Vehicle:2005 STi EFR 6758 04 S2000 EFR 7064 |
|
10-26-2018, 04:59 PM | #2641 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 33782
Join Date: Mar 2003
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Milton Keynes, UK
Vehicle:96 3MI Racing search FIRST, then PM!!! |
Dom had turned me on to this some years back, that the longer exhaust duration was helping broaden torque curve. We did the same with great success on the TIC Time Attack Car with some custom cams.
So now I'm doing a baby version of it with a stock EJ205 intake and an EJ257 exhaust cam. We'll see how it goes. I might someday put the STi intake in for comparison; if the engine needs to come out for some reason. |
10-26-2018, 07:21 PM | #2642 | ||
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 468393
Join Date: May 2017
Location: PDX OREGON
Vehicle:2017 STI |
Quote:
Quote:
I'm not up to speed on cams to know if duration is applied on either side of the rotation or if longer duration would only indicate, for example, closing later (vs. open sooner). |
||
10-26-2018, 10:03 PM | #2643 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 73932
Join Date: Nov 2004
Chapter/Region:
RMIC
Location: Denver
Vehicle:2005 STi EFR 6758 04 S2000 EFR 7064 |
Not quite what I was hoping for... It was a heartbreak dyno. I ran it up to 26 PSI and played with timing and this is what it got.
EFR 6758 w/.85 hot side @ 26 PSI on E85. What I don't get... I tuned a 20G XT WRX on a stock motor with head studs a couple months ago on this dyno and at 24 PSI, and tamer timing, it did 422whp. They also said they recalibrated the dyno yesterday. This was a 2.5XT-R on a stock long block WRX on E85 that I also did today... @21 PSI. I really should put it on a DynoJet to get a better idea as I am more in tune with them and they are far more consistent. And, I always see stuff I wouldn't expect with a Mustang Dyno, and that can be between different cars on the same day. Last edited by yamahaSHO; 10-31-2018 at 11:17 AM. |
10-26-2018, 10:16 PM | #2644 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 468393
Join Date: May 2017
Location: PDX OREGON
Vehicle:2017 STI |
Quote:
I wouldn't know what to expect at your altitude and with that turbo but the comparisons you threw up sure make it seem like yours is low. I expected a pt a bit sooner. The more I read and educate myself the more I realize how meaningless the actual dyno number really is sometimes. |
|
10-26-2018, 10:24 PM | #2645 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 73932
Join Date: Nov 2004
Chapter/Region:
RMIC
Location: Denver
Vehicle:2005 STi EFR 6758 04 S2000 EFR 7064 |
I do have the logs, I'll have to sit down and look at them when I get back home on Sunday. Spent all day on the dyno and then I'm road racing at the track tomorrow.
The altitude was 1,200 ft above sea level. What is weird is that between cars, I would get odd readings. They even told me that they didn't have it calibrated correctly on one car, giving HIGHER numbers. PT? The 422whp car doesn't seem faster than my car, especially not 50whp faster... So... Who knows. What I do know is I gained over 40whp on the dyno today (which my car didn't feel slower than the 422whp on the before-dyno numbers). There seem to be different expectation between cars, but I won't go into that. My car is fun to drive and has great power. EDIT: I went back and graphed some items from the log that made that graph. AFR was 12:1 (gas-referenced E85). Last edited by yamahaSHO; 10-26-2018 at 10:34 PM. |
10-26-2018, 10:31 PM | #2646 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 468393
Join Date: May 2017
Location: PDX OREGON
Vehicle:2017 STI |
Last time I was on the dyno (dyno jet) I logged my pulls and, when put into virtual Dyno on the dynojet setting I got something completely different..... Higher.
I also had to turn the boost up 2-3 psi to get my normal target boost because the dyno wasnt loading it like the street.... I assume. PT peak torque. |
10-26-2018, 10:34 PM | #2647 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 468393
Join Date: May 2017
Location: PDX OREGON
Vehicle:2017 STI |
[quote=yamahaSHO;45825564My car is fun to drive and has great power.[/QUOTE]
That's what counts. |
10-26-2018, 10:37 PM | #2648 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 73932
Join Date: Nov 2004
Chapter/Region:
RMIC
Location: Denver
Vehicle:2005 STi EFR 6758 04 S2000 EFR 7064 |
Ah... I see PT and think Part Throttle. It's a .85 hot side.
I had to turn up my boost to hit what I hit on the street. I did some pulls on the street right before the dyno, 26 PSI. On the dyno 22... I thought the Mustang would load it better, but I thought a log of things too. Last edited by yamahaSHO; 10-29-2018 at 02:11 PM. |
10-27-2018, 04:35 AM | #2649 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 15822
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: TOPOHTO
Vehicle:1999 WRB GM6 2.34 LR destroker |
300 torque @ 3500 and power holding up to the redline is a great powerband I think, dyno read differently so who cares about the numbers
I never tuned corn fuels, but I always thought it would provide bigger safety margin for more timing? |
10-27-2018, 08:57 AM | #2650 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 166005
Join Date: Dec 2007
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Northern 'Burbs
Vehicle:2005 Saab 92x Beaten Silver |
Quote:
Timing on ethanol does not involve finding knock and backing off. If you get it to knock, you are really over doing it. Egt can tell a story, but diminishing returns are useful to watch. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|