Welcome to the North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club Wednesday July 17, 2019
Home Forums WikiNASIOC Products Store Modifications Upgrade Garage
NASIOC
Go Back   NASIOC > NASIOC General > News & Rumors > Non-Subaru News & Rumors

Welcome to NASIOC - The world's largest online community for Subaru enthusiasts!
Welcome to the NASIOC.com Subaru forum.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, free of charge, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads. 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-03-2019, 09:04 AM   #51
Blitzkrieg
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 14913
Join Date: Feb 2002
Chapter/Region: TXIC
Vehicle:
2003 Lock Stock and
2 Smoking Barrels "wrx"

Default

Hmm, technology question. I wonder if the ability to 3D print magnets will catch on with electric motor development.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Blitzkrieg is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Old 07-03-2019, 09:30 AM   #52
mhoward1
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 9481
Join Date: Aug 2001
Chapter/Region: South East
Location: FFR Challenge #43
Vehicle:
1832 Steam Buggy
Wood

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blitzkrieg View Post
Hmm, While I don't really fit into the E's demographics (or any EV for that matter). There is one huge redeeming quality about electric cars. If this trend continues we could see a RWD renaissance. (I will forever miss you manual transmissions...)


DAMN you for taking away all my fun. (quick somebody give me some clutch fluid stat!)
The manual was on the way out anyways, much to my chagrin. But this isn't a bad consolation prize.
mhoward1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2019, 10:08 AM   #53
RODSCALIP5
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 65170
Join Date: Jun 2004
Default

RODSCALIP5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2019, 11:52 AM   #54
dwf137
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 161333
Join Date: Oct 2007
Chapter/Region: NWIC
Location: Seattle
Vehicle:
'18 Golf R
'14 Outback

Default

Well, the camera mirrors can't be implemented here in the states unless they change the vehicle requirements, so we don't need to worry about those.

Again, give me a little more pep, and I'd put in a deposit.
dwf137 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2019, 12:21 PM   #55
Keshav
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 1654
Join Date: Jun 2000
Chapter/Region: NWIC
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Vehicle:
2017 {null}
MV Agusta Brutale S

Default

re: rear mirror requirements

https://www.federalregister.gov/d/E9-4500/p-96

Quote:
FMVSS No. 111, Rearview Mirrors establishes requirements for the use, field of view, and mounting of motor vehicle rearview mirrors for rear visibility.[10] This standard was enacted in 1976 and applies to passenger cars, multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks, buses, school buses and motorcycles. The purpose of this standard is to reduce the number of deaths and injuries that occur when the driver of a motor vehicle does not have a clear and reasonably unobstructed view to the rear. With respect to passenger cars, the standard requires that manufacturers mount flat (also referred to as “plane” or “unit magnification”) mirrors both inside the vehicle and outside the vehicle on the driver's side. The inside mirror must, except as specified below, have a field of view at least 20 degrees wide and a sufficient vertical angle to provide a view of a level road surface extending to the horizon beginning not more than 200 feet (61 m) behind the vehicle. In cases where the interior mirror does not meet the specified field of view requirements, a plane or convex exterior mirror must be mounted on the passenger's side of the car. While a specific field of view is not indicated for the passenger-side rearview mirror, the driver's side rearview mirror is required to be a plane mirror that provides “the driver a view of a level road surface extending to the horizon from a line, perpendicular to a longitudinal plane tangent to the driver's side of the vehicle at the widest point, extending 2.4 m (7.9 ft) out from the tangent plane 10.7 m (35.1 ft) behind the driver's eyes, with the seat in the rearmost position.”
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/E9-4500/p-99

Quote:
FMVSS No. 111 does not currently establish minimum rear field of view requirements for vehicles, nor does it contain minimum requirements for indirect vision systems, such as rearview video systems. Because of the current absence of a federal regulation of this aspect of performance, there is the possibility that there may be existing State laws or regulations that regulate the vehicle's rear field of view of passenger vehicles.[11] However, as of this time, NHTSA is not aware of any such State laws or regulations. However, we request comment on existing or pending State laws or regulations in this area, as well as the basis and effect of such regulation, if any exist.
I'm not sure if its possible to get a waiver since this technology meets the goals of this law or not, but i'd be willing to toss any officials who try to block this car into the proverbial wood chipper.
Keshav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2019, 12:39 PM   #56
dwf137
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 161333
Join Date: Oct 2007
Chapter/Region: NWIC
Location: Seattle
Vehicle:
'18 Golf R
'14 Outback

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keshav View Post
re: rear mirror requirements

I'm not sure if its possible to get a waiver since this technology meets the goals of this law or not, but i'd be willing to toss any officials who try to block this car into the proverbial wood chipper.
https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.do...518_v3-tag.pdf

NHTSA has already looked at it. Tesla, Audi, Diamler, etc. all want this, and are petitioning to change FMVSS 111 to allow cameras. The Audi eTron is available with side view cameras in markets that allow it, but not in the US. This is pretty settled at the moment, nobody is going to be able to just plop a car on the showroom floor with camera side view mirrors.
dwf137 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2019, 12:42 PM   #57
Sid03SVT
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 183032
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: CT
Vehicle:
OLD Family Wagon

Default

well here the RWD leaf I wanted; if the price comes in under 30k it would be hard to pass up, oh right, it would also have to make it to this side of the pond.
Sid03SVT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2019, 12:42 PM   #58
Keshav
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 1654
Join Date: Jun 2000
Chapter/Region: NWIC
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Vehicle:
2017 {null}
MV Agusta Brutale S

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dwf137 View Post
https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.do...518_v3-tag.pdf

NHTSA has already looked at it. Tesla, Audi, Diamler, etc. all want this, and are petitioning to change FMVSS 111 to allow cameras. The Audi eTron is available with side view cameras in markets that allow it, but not in the US. This is pretty settled at the moment, nobody is going to be able to just plop a car on the showroom floor with camera side view mirrors.
Wood Chipper it is, then.

Now, Honda, build this car too:

Keshav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2019, 12:24 AM   #59
hi5.0
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 340456
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Vehicle:
2013 Impreza

Default

The more I see, the more I like what Honda is doing with this. However, I disagree with the justification for the E's relatively limited range compared to brand "T" stated in the video. But that's just from my POV based on how I would use the vehicle. Agree a dedicated sporting runabout version on this platform is needed.
hi5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2019, 03:18 PM   #60
Calamity Jesus
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 44501
Join Date: Oct 2003
Chapter/Region: NWIC
Location: Yeah, well, you know
Vehicle:
that 's, like, your
alternate facts, man.

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dwf137 View Post
https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.do...518_v3-tag.pdf

NHTSA has already looked at it. Tesla, Audi, Diamler, etc. all want this, and are petitioning to change FMVSS 111 to allow cameras. The Audi eTron is available with side view cameras in markets that allow it, but not in the US. This is pretty settled at the moment, nobody is going to be able to just plop a car on the showroom floor with camera side view mirrors.
The moment GM wants side-view cameras on the GenIII Volt, the laws will change. The DOT only changes policies in order to prop up established domestic corporations.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhoward1 View Post
The manual was on the way out anyways, much to my chagrin. But this isn't a bad consolation prize.
As a life-long manual-or-bust driver, I've never wanted a manual trans in any of the electric cars I've driven. Having a torquey motor that's always in the right gear (1st and Reverse) with loads of "engine braking" at all times is perfect. The biggest drawbacks of driving EVs is falling out of love with the crappy narrow powerbands of ICEs.
Calamity Jesus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2019, 08:29 PM   #61
Blitzkrieg
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 14913
Join Date: Feb 2002
Chapter/Region: TXIC
Vehicle:
2003 Lock Stock and
2 Smoking Barrels "wrx"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calamity Jesus View Post
The moment GM wants side-view cameras on the GenIII Volt, the laws will change. The DOT only changes policies in order to prop up established domestic corporations.


As a life-long manual-or-bust driver, I've never wanted a manual trans in any of the electric cars I've driven. Having a torquey motor that's always in the right gear (1st and Reverse) with loads of "engine braking" at all times is perfect. The biggest drawbacks of driving EVs is falling out of love with the crappy narrow powerbands of ICEs.
The only ICE that I truly enjoy ae the torque less wonder 2.0 from the S2000 with the stratospheric scream, and (only video recordings) the engine note of the flat crank V8 inside the stang.

I honestly crave a reverse trike with an electric motor. I feel that would be the craziest experience. Something like the now dead Morgan EV or the still born GX3 from VW


BlitXZ
Blitzkrieg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2019 Axivo Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2017, North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club, Inc.