Welcome to the North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club Tuesday December 3, 2024
Home Forums Images WikiNASIOC Products Store Modifications Upgrade Garage
NASIOC
Go Back   NASIOC > NASIOC General > Proven Power Bragging

Welcome to NASIOC - The world's largest online community for Subaru enthusiasts!
Welcome to the NASIOC.com Subaru forum.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, free of charge, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.







* As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. 
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads. 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-05-2003, 08:04 PM   #1
silver 02rex
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 14809
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hanover,Pa.
Vehicle:
2002 wrx
silver

Talking 263 HP on stock turbo/ no NOS

[IMG]userweb.suscom.net/~abetts1971[/IMG]

Just got tuned on Sat. @ TXS, Phil and Nathan were great!

My mods:

Utec
TXS v2. TMIC
completely catless TXS exhaust
Vishnu upipe
Vishnu pulley

oh, one other thing...C16!!! (awesome stuff)

TurboXS is awesome!!

Adam
(I hope the dyno sheet goes through, haven't posted any pics
yet)
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
silver 02rex is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Old 02-05-2003, 08:48 PM   #2
Eric SS
Sooby Guru
 
Member#: 1914
Join Date: Jul 2000
Chapter/Region: SWIC
Location: 2014 Q60S, 2016 Chevy SS
Vehicle:
2000 2.5RS w/ EJ22T
swap and N20. gone. : (

Default

Good numbers! That was to the ground right?

Eric
Eric SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2003, 09:07 PM   #3
silver 02rex
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 14809
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hanover,Pa.
Vehicle:
2002 wrx
silver

Default dyno chart

Yeah, that's @ the wheels, I hope the pic posts this time[IMG]userweb.suscom.net/~abetts1971/dyno.jpg[/IMG]
silver 02rex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2003, 09:09 PM   #4
silver 02rex
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 14809
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hanover,Pa.
Vehicle:
2002 wrx
silver

Default one more try

[IMG]userweb.suscom.net/~abetts1971/dyno.jpg[/IMG]
silver 02rex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2003, 09:13 PM   #5
Eric SS
Sooby Guru
 
Member#: 1914
Join Date: Jul 2000
Chapter/Region: SWIC
Location: 2014 Q60S, 2016 Chevy SS
Vehicle:
2000 2.5RS w/ EJ22T
swap and N20. gone. : (

Default

try putting the http:// in front of it to see if it will work

Eric
Eric SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2003, 10:17 PM   #6
stickman
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 13890
Join Date: Jan 2002
Chapter/Region: TXIC
Location: DFW
Vehicle:
2007 Mazda CX 7
Icy Blew

Default

how much boost??

those are great #'s for race gas.

did u dyno w/ pumped??

ill be on the dyno tomorrow to see what i get.
my mods:
TXS stealthback
unichip
vishnu uppipe
samco IC hoses.
i got 220hp/213 tq on my last run w/ a mbc no chip. the other mods listed tho.
stickman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2003, 12:08 AM   #7
amelnikov
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 9827
Join Date: Aug 2001
Chapter/Region: Tri-State
Location: New York
Vehicle:
2002 WRX Wgn 292whp
Alex Performance

Default

Here you go. Good numbers there, how much boost and how much timing were you running?

Alex...
amelnikov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2003, 12:55 AM   #8
is2scooby
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 19851
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Honolulu, HI
Vehicle:
02 WRX
Aspen White/[email protected]

Default

Wow! Were you running some high IDC's? Good on you!
is2scooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2003, 01:15 AM   #9
dachoe
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 16469
Join Date: Mar 2002
Default

wouldn't that make you in the 12's with stock turbo?? beautiful...
dachoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2003, 01:59 AM   #10
Eric SS
Sooby Guru
 
Member#: 1914
Join Date: Jul 2000
Chapter/Region: SWIC
Location: 2014 Q60S, 2016 Chevy SS
Vehicle:
2000 2.5RS w/ EJ22T
swap and N20. gone. : (

Default

Those are good looking graphs. I don't see any signs of the knock sensor pulling timing anywhere. That means no detonation.

Eric
Eric SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2003, 11:09 AM   #11
Need4Boost
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 15194
Join Date: Feb 2002
Chapter/Region: Tri-State
Location: 1^2 Mile, NJ
Vehicle:
2004 Lightning,
2001 BMW 330ci

Default

Quote:
Originally posted by dachoe
wouldn't that make you in the 12's with stock turbo?? beautiful...
Yep.

That is some impressive numbers for a stock turbo!

How much boost were you running?
Need4Boost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2003, 12:04 PM   #12
nmyeti
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 4980
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Albuquerque, NM USA
Default

We tuned the car last weekend so I can give some insights on the "state of tune"

On the 263hp 258ft/lbs run the injector duty cycles were much less than you might think. The reasons are as follows.

1. We were using C16 race fuel that has a very high specific gravity when compared to standard pump fuel. Each injector pulse is then good for, in essence, more fuel.
2. We were running the car at 12:1 Air-fuel ratio since C16 is such wonderful fuel.

On the 243hp run we were running very high IDC (99-100) on standard pump fuel. On the pump gas runs we were at 24-25 degrees of advance at 7000rpms.

Both of those runs were done on 16.9psi in the midrange tapering to around 12.8psi at redline.

This car was one of my favorites to drive on the street after the tune. It would be a wicked autocross setup, and I have no doubt that it can run 12s at the track on the stock turbo.

-Nathan
www.turboxs.com
nmyeti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2003, 12:27 PM   #13
MJU1983
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 14364
Join Date: Jan 2002
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Vehicle:
2003 WRX, '06 Armada
05 Vette & 05 STi (sold)

Default

Quote:
Originally posted by nmyeti
We tuned the car last weekend so I can give some insights on the "state of tune"

On the 263hp 258ft/lbs run the injector duty cycles were much less than you might think. The reasons are as follows.

1. We were using C16 race fuel that has a very high specific gravity when compared to standard pump fuel. Each injector pulse is then good for, in essence, more fuel.
2. We were running the car at 12:1 Air-fuel ratio since C16 is such wonderful fuel.

On the 243hp run we were running very high IDC (99-100) on standard pump fuel. On the pump gas runs we were at 24-25 degrees of advance at 7000rpms.

Both of those runs were done on 16.9psi in the midrange tapering to around 12.8psi at redline.

This car was one of my favorites to drive on the street after the tune. It would be a wicked autocross setup, and I have no doubt that it can run 12s at the track on the stock turbo.

-Nathan
www.turboxs.com
damn.. thats good...

-mike
MJU1983 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2003, 02:23 PM   #14
NotoriousWRX
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 9026
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: If I knew, I wouldn't be lost!
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by dachoe
wouldn't that make you in the 12's with stock turbo?? beautiful...
That car would run 12s even with me driving it.

Congrats, that's some awesome results!
NotoriousWRX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2003, 02:38 PM   #15
Hassassin
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 16771
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NJ 241HP 241TQ
Vehicle:
12.9 @ 102MPH
1.784 - Stock Turbo

Default

hhhmm... pulley & an intercooler... thats wut im missin...

great numbers, and let us kno wut that bad boy duz on the track
Hassassin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2003, 02:42 PM   #16
nmyeti
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 4980
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Albuquerque, NM USA
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Hassassin
hhhmm... pulley & an intercooler... thats wut im missin...

great numbers, and let us kno wut that bad boy duz on the track

I am not 100% convinced that his pulley did anything. I've made the same numbers at the same boost level and the same timing on another car without the pulley.

-Nathan
www.turboxs.com
nmyeti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2003, 02:44 PM   #17
Hassassin
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 16771
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NJ 241HP 241TQ
Vehicle:
12.9 @ 102MPH
1.784 - Stock Turbo

Default

Quote:
Originally posted by nmyeti



I am not 100% convinced that his pulley did anything. I've made the same numbers at the same boost level and the same timing on another car without the pulley.

-Nathan
www.turboxs.com
hhhmm... interesting
ive always been hearing good things about pulleys too... but maybe it wuz another company? Also, not sure of how much of a difference this would make, but does he have a sti scoop? or is he still using the stocker? What about intercooler hoses?
Hassassin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2003, 02:48 PM   #18
nmyeti
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 4980
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Albuquerque, NM USA
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Hassassin


hhhmm... interesting
ive always been hearing good things about pulleys too... but maybe it wuz another company? Also, not sure of how much of a difference this would make, but does he have a sti scoop? or is he still using the stocker? What about intercooler hoses?


I don't think the brand of pulley would matter, I just haven't observed any gains with them, and made the same basic power numbers on another car at the same level of tune.

The intercooler hoses are supplied with our intercooler. No need to purchase any additional hoses.

I don't remember if he had an STI scoop or not.
nmyeti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2003, 02:58 PM   #19
Hassassin
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 16771
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NJ 241HP 241TQ
Vehicle:
12.9 @ 102MPH
1.784 - Stock Turbo

Default

Quote:
Originally posted by nmyeti

I don't think the brand of pulley would matter, I just haven't observed any gains with them, and made the same basic power numbers on another car at the same level of tune.

The intercooler hoses are supplied with our intercooler. No need to purchase any additional hoses.

I don't remember if he had an STI scoop or not.
just goes to show that butt-dynos arent really accurate i guess... What pulleys have u tested and not seen any substantial gains?
Hassassin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2003, 06:37 PM   #20
PaulRex
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 12454
Join Date: Nov 2001
Chapter/Region: Tri-State
Location: Vermont
Vehicle:
10 Toyota Taco
K8 SV650SF

Default

Holy crap, those are great numbers, that must be an record for the stock turbo! Your car is definatly tuned to the max efficiency using the stock turbo for sure, impressive. Plus with the UTEC you can just switch to the race gas map whenever you want, nice.

Will running the 13g at nearly 17psi shorten it's life span? I guess they are plenty available for under $200 so you can always pick up an spare one..
PaulRex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2003, 07:10 PM   #21
hotrod
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 14141
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: [email protected] @ 5800 ft on 13T
Vehicle:
2002 Impreza WRX

Default Very good numbers

Congrats to you and a thumbs up to Phil, Nathan and the folks at TXS. Those power numbers are very close to what should be the theoretical limit of power you can get out of the stock turbo.

Max flow on that turbo is supposed to be about 360 CFM and the standard rule of thumb is it takes about 1.5 CFM for each horsepower (depending on F/A ratio). That works out to 240 hp so very nice job guys.

Larry
hotrod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2003, 08:12 PM   #22
silver 02rex
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 14809
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hanover,Pa.
Vehicle:
2002 wrx
silver

Default Thanks everybody!

The underdrive pulley just helps with quicker reving, it weighs like
5 pounds or so less than stock.
I do have the Sti hood scoop.

Thanks again Nathan and phil and TurboXS for the great products
and support!!

Adam
silver 02rex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2003, 11:32 AM   #23
Davenow
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 23676
Join Date: Aug 2002
Chapter/Region: NESIC
Location: de_dust and Orgrimar
Vehicle:
.

Default The pulleys DO make hp

But not peak. Peak HP will be unchanged with the pulley. What you do gain is a slightly fatter curve. In other words, you pick up a few HP along the curve, and it comes back down at the peak.
I have seen a couple dyno charts showing this. I will scrounge around I think I saved at least one of them. In any case, its only like 2-5 HP but the revving is improved, and quicker revving=quicker spool=more power sooner. Not more power peak.
Davenow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2003, 07:40 PM   #24
Hassassin
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 16771
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NJ 241HP 241TQ
Vehicle:
12.9 @ 102MPH
1.784 - Stock Turbo

Default Re: The pulleys DO make hp

Quote:
Originally posted by Davenow
But not peak. Peak HP will be unchanged with the pulley. What you do gain is a slightly fatter curve. In other words, you pick up a few HP along the curve, and it comes back down at the peak.
I have seen a couple dyno charts showing this. I will scrounge around I think I saved at least one of them. In any case, its only like 2-5 HP but the revving is improved, and quicker revving=quicker spool=more power sooner. Not more power peak.
ok, i understand... thnx
Hassassin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2003, 07:47 PM   #25
C-WREX
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 30815
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Waterloo, ON Canada
Vehicle:
2002 WRX 5mt Sedan
Sadona Red

Default

I don't mean to be a party pooper but acording to the graph you posted, those numbers are at the flywheel. I hope I read the graph wrong.
C-WREX is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Suwweeeet. 334 HP on stock turbo, at 6,000 ft elevation :) nixgame22 Off-Topic 7 03-17-2008 10:50 PM
412.7 wheel HP on stock sti 2.0 litre - No NOS - new record at Pruven Performance ! alfriedesq Proven Power Bragging 353 07-12-2006 04:09 PM
Most HP/TQ on Stock turbo? trhoppe Proven Power Bragging 24 04-07-2005 02:23 PM
Best 60 Foots on Stock Turbo no N20 Oo DaRk StAr oO Proven Power Bragging 13 09-24-2003 08:42 PM
Max Boost & HP on Stock WRX Turbo noob Newbies & FAQs 4 12-21-2002 07:19 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2024 Axivo Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2019, North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club, Inc.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission
Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.