|
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-12-2012, 01:46 AM | #1 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 331286
Join Date: Sep 2012
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Kansas
Vehicle:03 WRX 2.1 Stroker White |
Front Mount vs. Top Mount Intercoolers
What are the differences between the top and front mount intercooler? Is there any kind of performance difference, or is it mainly to clear some space off the top of the engine? And what is the best time to change to the front mount if thats what I want to do?
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
|
09-12-2012, 02:07 AM | #2 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 252195
Join Date: Jul 2010
Chapter/Region:
RMIC
Location: Da-Boonies... 801
Vehicle:07 WFC #900 @ 451awhp-404awtq |
More power you want bigger intercooler you will need! Tmic will limit in size cuz of space, so Fmic will be better route in end for bigger power! Plus Fmic does clear up space and makes things little easier work on also.
|
09-12-2012, 02:20 AM | #3 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 284792
Join Date: Jun 2011
Chapter/Region:
RMIC
Location: Vanilla Valley, CO
Vehicle:2011 STI Blurple |
|
09-12-2012, 07:22 AM | #4 |
Medium Frank
Moderator Member#: 140114
Join Date: Feb 2007
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Common Sense, VA
Vehicle:2020 Subaru Outback |
Did you even try to search for this?
|
09-12-2012, 08:09 AM | #5 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 306478
Join Date: Jan 2012
Chapter/Region:
South East
Location: chattanooga, TN
Vehicle:2016 Focus RS stock |
i think it pretty much comes down to personal preference bc in the typical street car they will both most likely perform the same. I will eventually get a TMIC bc i will never trim my bumper cover or remove the bumper core.
|
09-12-2012, 08:22 AM | #6 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 136358
Join Date: Jan 2007
Chapter/Region:
NESIC
Location: Newington, CT
Vehicle:2006 WRX Limited 6mt/5x114/vf43/S204 |
Been talked about lots of times. Anybody who says TMIC are small obviously are not looking. Quite a few large ones some as large as 1000cfm. That is more than larger enough for a gt30 turbo or similar. But if you want to go larger turbo than yea FMIC.
FMIC does make it a little easier to work on the car since you don't need to remove TMIC to work on items. FMIC require you to remove, cut or "replace" your crash beam. So what would have been a little accident is now a big accident if you hit something FMIC you may or may not be able to keep fog lights and intake. Depending on model. FMIC intercooler would allow you to use like an oil cooler in TMIC place if you wanted. Personally I will keep or upgrade my TMIC. Compromising safety isn't worth it to me. |
09-12-2012, 09:12 AM | #7 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 51961
Join Date: Jan 2004
Chapter/Region:
RMIC
Location: Broomfield, CO
Vehicle:2005 STi 2012 WRX |
FMIC will almost always perform better than a TMIC, mostly due to the vast increase in air flow over the core. The downsides are the extra piping required and the fact that you have to cut/remove your front bumper beam.
|
09-12-2012, 09:14 AM | #8 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 51961
Join Date: Jan 2004
Chapter/Region:
RMIC
Location: Broomfield, CO
Vehicle:2005 STi 2012 WRX |
CFM numbers for an intercooler core are worse than meaningless. CFM is not what matters, a straight section of 3" pipe has a higher CFM rating than any intercooler, but it won't cool the charge at all. What matters in an intercooler is efficiency, not flow rating, and the TMIC will almost always be worlds behind a good FMIC in this department.
|
09-12-2012, 09:28 AM | #9 | |
Former Vendor
Member#: 322524
Join Date: Jun 2012
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Chicago,IL
Vehicle:3.5 WRX STI WRB |
Quote:
This man is correct, but I have to say with the downpipe and header wrapped a high quality TMIC can preform just as well as any FMIC. What it really depends on is the application. For any car that is simply street driven I always suggest a TMIC > and FMIC because the benefits of the front mount simply do not out weigh the risks. If you plan on building a strictly drag strip car where you will be sitting in line and have large possibility of experiencing heat soak a front mount could be really beneficial. If you are building a HPDE car, a good top mount with the correct ducting from the hood scoop and properly wrapped pipes might be a better choice. |
|
09-12-2012, 09:53 AM | #10 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 134005
Join Date: Dec 2006
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Vehicle:2004 WRX Premium PSM |
Personally, I'll stick with the TMIC due to some increased lag when going to a FMIC. I personally think TMICs are just fine for street cars.
|
09-12-2012, 10:20 AM | #11 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 244879
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: PA
Vehicle:2006 STI stage 2 Needs a 20g |
Is there evidence that the Fmic causes real lag? 500 rpms or more when comparing a quality Tmic (Process West) to lets say a (Turbo Sx/Perrin) Fmic?
|
09-12-2012, 10:30 AM | #12 | |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 51961
Join Date: Jan 2004
Chapter/Region:
RMIC
Location: Broomfield, CO
Vehicle:2005 STi 2012 WRX |
Quote:
Like you said though, it's all about application. For anything under a ~50 lb/min turbo on the street I think a TMIC is perfectly fine. For anything bigger than that I think a TMIC simply doesn't have enough cooling air from the hood scoop to keep up with that much flow. With my Turbo XS FMIC and a 30r going full tilt, it's rare to see the post-IC air more than 5 deg above ambient. You simply will not get that kind of performance out of any TMIC. |
|
09-12-2012, 11:02 AM | #13 | |
Former Vendor
Member#: 322524
Join Date: Jun 2012
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Chicago,IL
Vehicle:3.5 WRX STI WRB |
Quote:
I'll agree with you on that. My only concern is when you see NASIOC members running a FMIC on a vf turbo . I believe a majority of people run a front mount mainly for looks . I still wish some company or shop would give some comparable results of a variety of different top mounts and front mounts with an IAT placed post intercooler to have some actual data on how well these intercoolers are actually cooling said air. As far as the lag issue goes. In all the cars I've ridden in the extra piping will create some extra lag, but it's almost unnoticable in most applications. The worst case I saw was a 20Ged EJ25 hitting peak boost (23psi) only 300rpm later with the addition of a front mount. It was basically no issue though because a fair amount more timing was able to be added due to more efficient cooling capabilities. In the end if you go top or front the best thing to do is use a quality core, or atleast something that your tuner has had good results with. Yo could slap on the biggest core in the best possible location, but if it has no actual ability to cool the charged air then it's useless. |
|
09-12-2012, 11:07 AM | #14 | |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 51961
Join Date: Jan 2004
Chapter/Region:
RMIC
Location: Broomfield, CO
Vehicle:2005 STi 2012 WRX |
Quote:
|
|
09-12-2012, 11:59 AM | #15 | |
Former Vendor
Member#: 322524
Join Date: Jun 2012
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Chicago,IL
Vehicle:3.5 WRX STI WRB |
Quote:
I can understand that the method of doing a true test that would be accurately repeated would be costly (wind tunnel and all), but there could be some simple road tests preformed on the same car with a variety of different intercoolers. The cost of a new IAT sensor is somewhere around $80 or so, and the cost of welding it post intercooler would be no more then $30-40. We just need to contact all the producers of intercoolers for subaru's and see if they are willing to donate some cores |
|
09-12-2012, 12:02 PM | #16 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 198861
Join Date: Jan 2009
Chapter/Region:
SCIC
Location: Orange County, CA
Vehicle:2004 WRX PSM |
there has been so many debates about this...i say its all preference and looks. i prefer a top mount however im not going to run one until i upgrade my turbo.
|
09-12-2012, 12:07 PM | #17 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 153412
Join Date: Jul 2007
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Springfield,il
Vehicle:1998 Impreza wrxRS Black |
Quote:
Just READ some of the posts I also want a fmic just to make clearece(swapped gc, no bellows from the scoop either) |
|
09-12-2012, 12:08 PM | #18 | ||
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 304819
Join Date: Dec 2011
Chapter/Region:
South East
Location: Holly Springs, North Carolina
Vehicle:2016 WRX STi Crystal Black Silica |
Quote:
Quote:
In re: to the FMIC not having crashbeams depends on brands. TurboXS offers a crashbeam for 2012 wrx... -BMH |
||
09-12-2012, 12:13 PM | #19 | |
Former Vendor
Member#: 322524
Join Date: Jun 2012
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Chicago,IL
Vehicle:3.5 WRX STI WRB |
Quote:
Getting the front bumper on the newer models of is a breeze, its about 10 push clips and it pops right off. Your statement concerning the crashbeam is incorrect. The beam TurboXS (and basically every other brand offers) is not a crashbeam, but just a support beam. The beams supplied are not crash test rated, and really will provide no sort of protection in an actual crash. Your front bumper beam is designed in according with the rest of the unibody and support system in order to decipate force of an impact in a calculated way. Removing a key component, like the crashbeam, makes the system all but worthless. |
|
09-12-2012, 12:17 PM | #20 | |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 304819
Join Date: Dec 2011
Chapter/Region:
South East
Location: Holly Springs, North Carolina
Vehicle:2016 WRX STi Crystal Black Silica |
Quote:
I see what your saying but its also better than driving around with nothing at all true?? crashbeam...true front bump beam....I'd still feel safer knowing it was there. I didn't mean to take this off topic. -BMH |
|
09-12-2012, 12:27 PM | #21 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 136358
Join Date: Jan 2007
Chapter/Region:
NESIC
Location: Newington, CT
Vehicle:2006 WRX Limited 6mt/5x114/vf43/S204 |
Not saying cfm is everything but does have some effect. Just saying their is a lot of nice tmic out there that do a great job still with bigger turbos.
Yes Turboxs and others offer crash beam replacements but have yet to see 1 crash test with it. So how do you know if that beam is worse or better than the OEM one. Granted you can use JDM beam with fmic too just again not the same as usdm one when it comes to safety standards. For me if you racing the car all the time, go fmic. If you got some huge huge turbo then go fmic. But I see all the time people with vf turbos or like a 16-18g turbo running a fmic when its just not needed. Just my take on it |
09-12-2012, 12:28 PM | #22 | |
Former Vendor
Member#: 322524
Join Date: Jun 2012
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Chicago,IL
Vehicle:3.5 WRX STI WRB |
Quote:
I guess it's better then nothing, but not by much. In reality if you a driving with a FMIC and you get into even a small front end collision your intercooler will be damaged, and as the speed of said collision increases so will a lot more. In my personal opinion I don't see any reason to drive a street car around with an FMIC. Even though a top mount may not be as efficient, for a daiyl driver or a mainly street driven car the potential risks are not worth the benefits. |
|
09-12-2012, 12:32 PM | #23 | |
Former Vendor
Member#: 322524
Join Date: Jun 2012
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Chicago,IL
Vehicle:3.5 WRX STI WRB |
Quote:
|
|
09-12-2012, 12:50 PM | #24 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 201329
Join Date: Jan 2009
Chapter/Region:
TXIC
Location: Humble, Tx
Vehicle:2004 WRX WRB |
My 04 wrx with a Perrin stage 2 map dynoed at 238whp and 217wtq with the stock intercooler on a mustang dyno.
I uprgraded to a front mount and went back to the dyno. The only other change was the addition of a COBB SF intake, because of course you cannot run the stock airbox with the intercooler piping. I did NOT retune or anything. Made 271whp and 246wtq on the same dyno. This is still with the TDO4. I just couldn't justify the price of an aftermarket TMIC compared to a FMIC. Even if I went with a bigger TMIC, I would still have heat soak. Not taking sides, just providing my results. Last edited by Talon4ever; 09-12-2012 at 12:56 PM. |
09-12-2012, 02:26 PM | #25 | |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 244879
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: PA
Vehicle:2006 STI stage 2 Needs a 20g |
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|