|
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-30-2014, 01:38 PM | #1326 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 193757
Join Date: Nov 2008
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Cedar, MI HP Techs MPS-SSLR2.5
Vehicle:2006 XTI Limited OBP, Junior tuned 573WHP |
Quote:
Questions are always good if they are well thought out questions. Some are not!
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
|
|
01-30-2014, 01:42 PM | #1327 | |
Former Vendor
Member#: 190729
Join Date: Oct 2008
Chapter/Region:
NWIC
Location: Marysville, WA
|
Quote:
He was explaining that when he ****ed it up, during the repair he noticed how little material there was. He didn't say that his failure was due to low material. |
|
01-30-2014, 01:54 PM | #1328 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 193757
Join Date: Nov 2008
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Cedar, MI HP Techs MPS-SSLR2.5
Vehicle:2006 XTI Limited OBP, Junior tuned 573WHP |
^^^The point is that's why he had the failure and cracked his block. It has nothing to do with stud diameter or this closed deck thread, durability of the block or any power level that we are discussing here. You also have to look at the block from all angles, sure some areas are thin but that does not mean the area that this stud fits into is weak. That is what I was pointing out but he seemingly failed to comprehend!
|
01-30-2014, 02:00 PM | #1329 | |||
Former Vendor
Member#: 190729
Join Date: Oct 2008
Chapter/Region:
NWIC
Location: Marysville, WA
|
Quote:
Allen, he said that. You are clearly the one not comprehending here. His failure had nothing to do with the thickness. He said that. He personally FEELS that there isn't enough material in that area. And honestly, it's probably a valid point. You are discrediting his point by drawing attention to his failure. His failure was only the method by which he discovered that there was very little material. He did not have a neat cutaway of a block. He broke his, went to fix it and said "HOLY CRAP THERE ISN'T MUCH HERE". Then he mentioned it to us. He is saying this (FORGET EVERYTHING ELSE) and I'm paraphrasing: Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
01-30-2014, 02:04 PM | #1330 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 193757
Join Date: Nov 2008
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Cedar, MI HP Techs MPS-SSLR2.5
Vehicle:2006 XTI Limited OBP, Junior tuned 573WHP |
Quote:
|
|
01-30-2014, 02:14 PM | #1331 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 193757
Join Date: Nov 2008
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Cedar, MI HP Techs MPS-SSLR2.5
Vehicle:2006 XTI Limited OBP, Junior tuned 573WHP |
I think it's pretty clear that the bigger studs offer more strength and holding power because of the bite they give into the block. This is proven, nothing new and Outfront was not the pioneer here. They are bring attention to it again in this thread and those great photos show the added bite their 1/2" studs are giving but also reveal the material thickness in that cross sectional view of the block. I was just trying to point out that the material thickness around the head stud threads is not uniform and there is more material when you look at it from a different cross sectional view.
Last edited by manitou; 01-30-2014 at 03:28 PM. |
01-30-2014, 03:24 PM | #1332 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 349945
Join Date: Mar 2013
Chapter/Region:
SWIC
Location: Tempe, AZ
Vehicle:2015 WRX GBP |
Has there ever been a failure from a head stud pulling out a chunk of the block with head studs of any size? I know I've seen instances of the threads failing...but not the block itself.
|
01-30-2014, 03:50 PM | #1333 | |
Former Vendor
Member#: 220204
Join Date: Aug 2009
Chapter/Region:
SCIC
Location: Buena Park, CA
|
Quote:
we tested a stock fastner with a snap-on digital torque wrench with torque recall. the stock fastner gave way at 125ftlbs. at this point the stud felt like it was deforming/growing (it did not pull out) ARP2000, this fastner torqued to 166ftlbs (from memory) when the fastner had no more to give. it also appeared to be stretching 625+ this fastner torqued to 185 ftlbs when it wouldn't go any more, it also started to stretch this shows that these two studs above are really at their max torque (75% of yield) The New Outfront 1/2" head stud torqued to 201ftlbs and then our socket broke. getting a new socket we torqued it to 233ftlbs, the fastner still felt strong and no feeling of stretch. torque facts from ARP 11mm ARP2000= 15,700 pounds clamping at 90ftlbs cost $220 220ksi 11mm ARP625+= 18,000 pounds of clamping at 100ftlbs cost $520 260ksi Outfront 1/2= 20,500 pounds of clamping at 140ftlbs cost $480 $220ksi Our studs do require block and head machining that we can do for $270 there is zero reason for spending the money on timeserting the block for 11mm studs. it is clear that there is no "pullout" of any stud before the yield was met or at 233ftlbs! we will start a new "stud torture test" thread Outfront Last edited by outfrontmotorsports; 01-30-2014 at 05:25 PM. |
|
01-30-2014, 04:01 PM | #1334 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 166324
Join Date: Dec 2007
Chapter/Region:
NESIC
Location: BLOD in BLOD out
|
In for those results. I wish I could have had the machining done to use those 1/2 studs. I guess I'll be using the 625+ for now.
|
01-30-2014, 04:03 PM | #1335 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 310077
Join Date: Feb 2012
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Pleasant Hill, IA
Vehicle:2007 Legacy GT SpecB DGM |
I'm loving it....I feel even better about my planned boost levels!!
So the failure point of the 1/2" is still unknown? I know we are beyond the point of reason already but inquiring minds want to know |
01-30-2014, 04:10 PM | #1336 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 76785
Join Date: Dec 2004
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: DSM iowa
Vehicle:2000 700Whp The RSTI SRP |
Awesome! Glad I stepped up to the 1/2" studs on my build!
|
01-30-2014, 04:11 PM | #1337 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 84105
Join Date: Mar 2005
Chapter/Region:
SCIC
Location: I'm a Newbie
Vehicle:2005 Super Slow STi CGM |
In for the video. I would like to see what kind of distortion that kind of force puts on the main bearings. Up to 100 ft/lbs. I have not noticed any measurable difference, however I have heard, when you get past 120ft/lbs it starts moving stuff around.
|
01-30-2014, 04:21 PM | #1338 | |
Former Vendor
Member#: 220204
Join Date: Aug 2009
Chapter/Region:
SCIC
Location: Buena Park, CA
|
Quote:
but guess what?...........................both of the 11mm units could not come out of the block using the allen (or should I say my allen started to strip out beings that these studs used in this test are junk, we just put a stud removing tool on them to get them out. they did not come out easy and felt like the threads in the block were not OK any more. So Chris (KillerBee) there is your answer: threads pulling out of the block with stock 11 mm threads appears to start happening at 140-170 ftlbs. pull out of the 1/2"ers are unknown at this point. it also proved that there is no weakness in the block (at least at 233ftlbs) I might add we did find a weakness with our kit. The 1/2" 12point nut did not move on our stud. this test damaged the nut! Outfront |
|
01-30-2014, 04:59 PM | #1339 |
Former Vendor
Member#: 220204
Join Date: Aug 2009
Chapter/Region:
SCIC
Location: Buena Park, CA
|
The video will take over two hours to up load. we will be posting future posts regarding the studs in this thread: http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show....php?t=2595764
Outfront |
01-30-2014, 06:18 PM | #1340 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 57064
Join Date: Mar 2004
Vehicle:2008 STi IAG built HTA86 E85 Kel272s Cos IM |
Quote:
|
|
01-30-2014, 06:24 PM | #1341 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 84105
Join Date: Mar 2005
Chapter/Region:
SCIC
Location: I'm a Newbie
Vehicle:2005 Super Slow STi CGM |
Probably the same at 625's and L19's.
|
01-30-2014, 07:30 PM | #1342 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 133146
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SC
Vehicle:07 FPgreen 7.37@95 WRX VF39+E85 12.0, 121mph |
|
01-30-2014, 07:53 PM | #1343 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 57064
Join Date: Mar 2004
Vehicle:2008 STi IAG built HTA86 E85 Kel272s Cos IM |
Seems like Outfront closed deck + their headstuds in the future for me
what headgaskets are you guys using? |
01-30-2014, 08:01 PM | #1344 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 76785
Join Date: Dec 2004
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: DSM iowa
Vehicle:2000 700Whp The RSTI SRP |
|
01-30-2014, 08:02 PM | #1345 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 57064
Join Date: Mar 2004
Vehicle:2008 STi IAG built HTA86 E85 Kel272s Cos IM |
nice I'll keep that in mind
|
01-30-2014, 08:08 PM | #1346 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 166324
Join Date: Dec 2007
Chapter/Region:
NESIC
Location: BLOD in BLOD out
|
That recipe sounds like WINNING to me.
|
01-30-2014, 08:19 PM | #1347 | |
Former Vendor
Member#: 220204
Join Date: Aug 2009
Chapter/Region:
SCIC
Location: Buena Park, CA
|
Quote:
and the cross section of the fastner, therefore the resistance to stretch is directly proportional to clamping force, are you saying they are different? I think the balancing act you referred to is when the diameter stays the same and you are trying to maximize the fastner within your limits, however going to the larger stud (as long as there are no side effects to block cracking under load and proven negative today) allows for 1 more thread engagement 2 larger thread diameter (more surface contact) 3 if only torqued to 120ftlbs then the fastner is being used at 60% of yield unlike those running at 80% yield, So you tell me if my fastner and the 625+ were both torqued to 100ftlbs, the one at 80% yield and the other at 60% which would be more likely to stretch? in theory they should hold the same. however where ours shine is when you need to go over 100ftlbs. It is not proven yet how high you could torque a head without distortion, it's possible that that torque could be 140ftlbs and we never knew because the only fastners available could only be torqued to 100. the argument of not torqueing the heads any tighter than stock because it might warp the head was more likey because the fastners couldn't handle anything more--not that the head couldn't. It will be interesting to see more testing, we will gear up to see the effects on the mains when a head is torqued to 140. of course this would be a candidate for ARP case studs before the test is done. Outfront |
|
01-30-2014, 08:28 PM | #1348 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 57064
Join Date: Mar 2004
Vehicle:2008 STi IAG built HTA86 E85 Kel272s Cos IM |
With the outfront head studs being so strong, is there any need to O-ring their closed deck block if I want to run 37psi?
|
01-30-2014, 08:35 PM | #1349 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 76785
Join Date: Dec 2004
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: DSM iowa
Vehicle:2000 700Whp The RSTI SRP |
|
01-30-2014, 08:43 PM | #1350 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 57064
Join Date: Mar 2004
Vehicle:2008 STi IAG built HTA86 E85 Kel272s Cos IM |
^^^very nice, I'll definitely go this direction by the end of this year/next year (when I run my current built block to 60k or if it fails whichever first lol). I'm just waiting for more guinea pigs to report back on their Outfront closed deck, all positive reviews so far
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|