|
Tire & Wheel Forum sponsored by The Tire Rack |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-02-2006, 01:27 PM | #1 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 47039
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Minnesota
Vehicle:2004 WRX Red |
Why did Subaru subtract 1/2" from rims of WRX?
Why did Subaru decide to specify 6.5" wide rims for the WRX, when for years Imprezas were fitted with 16x7" wheels?
Why the decrease in width when this was the most powerful, sportiest car released in the States since the SVX? Why go backwards(if this can be considered that) by fitting a smaller wheel? Is it because a 6.5" wide rim is the optimum size for the 205/55 R16 tire? Was it that much cheaper to specify a 6.5" wheel instead of a 7" wheel? Is there an endless supply of RE92s in 205/55 R16 that need to be used up?(It doesn't seem so with a price of $150.00 each at the Tirerack(r).) Doesn't the 16x7 oem wheel support the 205/55 R16 tire better than the 16x6.5 oem wheel?
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
|
01-02-2006, 01:50 PM | #2 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 30342
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: #blp
|
I would guess it was a combination of cost & better mileage.
Plus they knew most WRX owners would be purchasing aftermarket rims anyways. Last edited by fliz; 01-02-2006 at 02:02 PM. |
01-02-2006, 02:03 PM | #3 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 68346
Join Date: Aug 2004
Chapter/Region:
NESIC
Vehicle:2004 Tacoma 2015 GX460 |
i'll say cost too
|
01-02-2006, 03:59 PM | #4 | |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 47039
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Minnesota
Vehicle:2004 WRX Red |
Quote:
One of the problems with aftermarket rims is that they don't come in the ideal offset(ET+55) for Subarus. From what I've seen at TireRack the closest is SSRs with ET50--still not ideal. I know that Prodrive wheels come in the correct offset(the ones that are Subaru specific). And 2004 OEM BBS wheels for the STi are the correct offset. But you can only pull those off a STi or purchase them from a Subaru for $700+ dollars each, or you can get them for half price from a recycler or remanufacturer. |
|
01-02-2006, 06:25 PM | #5 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 44581
Join Date: Oct 2003
Chapter/Region:
BAIC
Location: Nor-Cal Ghetto Garage
Vehicle:3 Boxers 2 AWD 3 turbo 1 6cyl & a 13BT |
I think the better question is, why did the 98-01 RS come with STi/WRX wheels?
|
01-02-2006, 07:03 PM | #6 | |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 5851
Join Date: Apr 2001
Chapter/Region:
VIC
Location: Vancouver
Vehicle:17 Ford Escape SE Blk |
Quote:
|
|
01-02-2006, 07:31 PM | #7 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 6598
Join Date: May 2001
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: West side of Indianapolis
Vehicle:2017 Golf R Limestone Grey |
Not true.
Legacy GT wheels are 17X7.0 and ET +55 and work GREAT on our cars. |
01-02-2006, 11:58 PM | #8 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 1197
Join Date: Apr 2000
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Vehicle:2013 BMW X1 Pearl White |
Quote:
But as wheels get wider, space between the wheel and the strut starts to get tight, so reduced offsets become necessary in order to run wider wheels. My experience is with the older cars - I think perhaps the WRX Sedan struts are offset in a manner that creates more strut clearance, so the problem might not be as extreme with them. _Jeff |
|
01-03-2006, 12:29 AM | #9 | |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 47039
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Minnesota
Vehicle:2004 WRX Red |
Quote:
Like the previous post said, thats why Legacy GT wheels work great, they have the ET55 offset we need on a WRX. Please forgive me if I don't know what I'm talking about--I'm still a noobie. |
|
01-03-2006, 12:33 AM | #10 |
*** Banned ***
Member#: 16200
Join Date: Mar 2002
Vehicle:OK buy Nates beans westcoastroasting.com |
....the bastards wanted to give us crap.....and DID.
that's why |
01-03-2006, 12:39 AM | #11 | |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 47039
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Minnesota
Vehicle:2004 WRX Red |
Quote:
This thread: Sticky Thread Sticky: The Offset Information Thread, had me all confused because it starts out stating offset is relative to rim width. So the deal is, is that most wheels out there are not ideal for a Subaru(unless they have offset of ET55 or ET53), there are just some that are close enough to not cause too much trouble? |
|
01-03-2006, 01:30 AM | #12 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 5851
Join Date: Apr 2001
Chapter/Region:
VIC
Location: Vancouver
Vehicle:17 Ford Escape SE Blk |
No, if you want to run a 255 wide tire you are not going to fit it on a 7 or 7.5 inch rim. Ideally you are going to want 8.5-9". Running something that wide with a 55 offset will interfere with pretty well any strut set-up I know of. So in that case a 55 offset is NOT ideal. If you put an aftermarket brake kit you will be very unlikely to find a wheel with a 53-55 offset that will fit. You will usually have to go with a wider (or larger diameter wheel) with a lower offset. Since I'd say the average shmo on this site does NOT have a stock car I would also say that the stock 55 offset wheel is not ideal for most applications. Also the difference between a 55 offset and a 48 is negligable as far as increased wear on ANY part of the car.
|
01-03-2006, 02:13 AM | #13 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 16803
Join Date: Mar 2002
Chapter/Region:
International
Location: London, England
|
Because SOA ****ing hates the enthusiast!
|
01-03-2006, 03:56 AM | #14 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 44581
Join Date: Oct 2003
Chapter/Region:
BAIC
Location: Nor-Cal Ghetto Garage
Vehicle:3 Boxers 2 AWD 3 turbo 1 6cyl & a 13BT |
Quote:
|
|
01-03-2006, 08:00 AM | #15 | |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 1134
Join Date: Mar 2000
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA
Vehicle:2015 Outback H-6 White |
Quote:
That may also be an issue of cost. The wheels were already in circulation overseas, so why produce something new? But when they wanted to release the new-age car in the US, I'm sure that a 16" version of the wheel they decided to use in Europe (remember it was the same wheel, just 17" instead) was the economical choice. And it likely just happened to translate to a 6.5" width. One of those unfortunate coincidences, I think. I don't personally believe Subaru "removed" 0.5" to spite anyone. =S2= |
|
01-03-2006, 10:08 AM | #16 | |
*** Banned ***
Member#: 16200
Join Date: Mar 2002
Vehicle:OK buy Nates beans westcoastroasting.com |
Quote:
...a lot of the japanese think americans are 'lamers' and don't need or want REAL high performance anything....we almost certainly wouldn't have got the STi here if Mitsu haddn't done the EVO here, first. |
|
01-03-2006, 12:45 PM | #17 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 21811
Join Date: Jul 2002
Chapter/Region:
International
|
Because the 6.5" width works fine with a 205/55 section tire while the 215/45 or 225/45 tires used with the 17" wheels work better with a 7.0" rim. They spec the wheel for the tire they install not for one that people would like to install. It also saved 1/2 pound per wheel over the previous 16x7 wheel which may have been important to them as the GD Impreza porked up a lot.
|
01-03-2006, 01:36 PM | #18 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 1197
Join Date: Apr 2000
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Vehicle:2013 BMW X1 Pearl White |
Quote:
_Jeff |
|
01-03-2006, 01:40 PM | #19 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 44581
Join Date: Oct 2003
Chapter/Region:
BAIC
Location: Nor-Cal Ghetto Garage
Vehicle:3 Boxers 2 AWD 3 turbo 1 6cyl & a 13BT |
Quote:
|
|
01-03-2006, 01:52 PM | #20 | |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 16803
Join Date: Mar 2002
Chapter/Region:
International
Location: London, England
|
Quote:
|
|
01-03-2006, 01:58 PM | #21 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 6598
Join Date: May 2001
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: West side of Indianapolis
Vehicle:2017 Golf R Limestone Grey |
The short answer is MONEY.
Cheaper to make the wheel 16X6.5 than 16X7.0 The good news is that they finally got wise and we get 17X7.0 on the 06+ WRX |
01-03-2006, 02:18 PM | #22 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 1197
Join Date: Apr 2000
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Vehicle:2013 BMW X1 Pearl White |
Quote:
Of course, I think most of us would agree that the RE-92 HAD to be a Money-based decision, so perhaps it was the Money decision on the tires that resulted in the narrower wheel size. As to why they didn't do this on the GC-era cars, well, it was a relatively limited run, and they already had the 7" wide wheel, which was a better match for the 205/50r16 tire they were putting on the cars for the rest of the world. Ironic as it may seem, they probably didn't want to spend the money to create a narrower wheel for the old RS, so they slapped the cheapo tires on 16x7 wheels. In a weird way, the reason the RS got 7" width was probably to SAVE money, while the newer WRX got a narrow wheel to better-match the stock tire. _Jeff |
|
01-03-2006, 03:35 PM | #23 | |
*** Banned ***
Member#: 16200
Join Date: Mar 2002
Vehicle:OK buy Nates beans westcoastroasting.com |
Quote:
|
|
01-03-2006, 03:46 PM | #24 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 1197
Join Date: Apr 2000
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Vehicle:2013 BMW X1 Pearl White |
Quote:
But, yes, I see your point. _Jeff |
|
01-03-2006, 04:15 PM | #25 | |
*** Banned ***
Member#: 16200
Join Date: Mar 2002
Vehicle:OK buy Nates beans westcoastroasting.com |
Quote:
...because the re92's are quiet and smooth and squishie and very OEM and don't make granny think that her car is harsh or loud or high performance or the sp5000 isn't 'oem enough' |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WRX Rear subframe lockout - why did Subaru put those holes there? | mmiller2002 | Brakes, Steering & Suspension | 1 | 04-10-2009 10:46 PM |
Why did Subaru use the 2.5L in the new WRX? | bmw50021 | General Community | 90 | 01-29-2007 02:32 PM |
Why Did Subaru Change Rear Sway Bar Size in the WRX? | Turbo20VJetta | Brakes, Steering & Suspension | 13 | 05-07-2006 02:20 PM |
Why or why did Subaru put that there? | Diabolical1 CC | General Community | 1 | 08-17-2004 10:07 AM |