|
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-22-2001, 08:06 PM | #1 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 3310
Join Date: Dec 2000
Chapter/Region:
South East
Location: SC
|
2002 RS vs. 98-01 RS
I know the new RS is chunkier, but I wondered if anyone has had this match up yet?
What is the reported (not that you can rely on that) 0 to 60 of the 2002 RS? Did SOA turn the car into a slouch?
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
|
04-22-2001, 09:00 PM | #2 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 1581
Join Date: Jun 2000
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: yonkers, ny
Vehicle:MY00 RS/STi7 MY01 RS Both Silverthorne |
I wouldn't give any SOA numbers your time. They advertise 0-60 for the WRX in 6.4 seconds. Everyone knows it faster than that, but most companies under rate their performance. At the NY autoshow they said it does it in 5.7 seconds.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
wtb/wtt rs 16's? 98-01 rs wheels! | uathatis | TXIC Private Classifieds | 14 | 06-12-2007 11:06 PM |
Quick question. Hanger location 02 RS vs. 98-01 and 02-03 WRX | HolyCrikey | Normally Aspirated Powertrain | 10 | 06-28-2005 11:13 AM |
2002 RS vs. 99-01 RS | polaris | Impreza Forum | 24 | 09-01-2004 05:29 PM |
2002 WRX engine in 98-01 RS swap | Arnie | Factory 2.0L Turbo Powertrain (EJ Series Factory 2.0L Turbo) | 1 | 05-19-2001 07:05 AM |
Pic of an 98-01 RS with 2002 wrx wheels....i was here somewhere.. | [freeman] | Brakes, Steering & Suspension | 11 | 03-29-2001 07:04 PM |