Quote:
Originally Posted by oreos
Did I misunderstand you? Is nine years and 75k miles forever? Interesting that you list a 1996 Volvo as your vehicle rather than the one you say has the best reputation and reliability. How many times has part of your 12+ year old Volvo's engine needed repair? How many major repairs has it needed. How many miles does it have? I know Volvo's that would refer to a 75kmi/9yr car just getting its start. And I know Honda would claim best reputation, reliability as well as customer satisfaction too.
Of course, our auto industry is one of the few where a retailer basically can sell/service only one brand in the store. And of course, our entire auto industry is in such fine shape
First of all, what I drive has NOTHING to do with this conversation, or my viewpoint on Subaru, but if you must know:
Before purchasing my Volvo USED, I did search for a Subaru. Unfortunately, what I could afford and what I wanted did not mix.
My husband is a Master Certified Volvo tech, so any repairs needed I get done for just parts, usually at a discount. The only thing I have done is minor maintenance, front brakes and wipers. It does need more work though.
My vehicle has 229,000 miles on it. When I bought it, it had about 175,000 miles. The deal fell in my lap, and for what I paid for it, I have already gotten my money's worth. No major engine repairs have been done by me, and I personally do not know the history of the vehicle, but my husband might. BUT, if you want to use this to compare to Subaru, I could tell you stories about how unreliable Volvos can be....throttle bodies, over 550 recalls on models (on model had 11 alone), computer issues, etc. For all I know, mine coulde have 5 engines replaced and two transmissions. But, when I bought it for $2000.00 everything was fine and it's been fine since.