|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 440533
Join Date: Feb 2016
|
![]() Hey guys, I've been going back and forth between turbos and single vs twinscroll for the better half of two years, so I would really appreciate some insight. Car is an 04 STi. I do understand I've probably overbuilt it at this point, and I do understand this will be expensive.
Basically I just want a fun street car that has a useable power band and good spool up. I'm not really interested in track or drag. I'm having the turbo kit custom fabricated and its being paired with an ETS 3.5" IC core. The turbo will be externally gated and rerouted back into the downpipe regardless of selection. The block is currently built but will eventually be replaced with a staged IAG CD and appropriately built heads. All other supporting mods will be accounted for as well but the point of this thread is for the turbo selection. I'm currently debating between a Borg warner TS 7163, 7670 and considering a SS G series. The main reason I'm leaning towards the 7670 is having the option of an aluminum CHRA and basically having some room to grow in the future. The reason I'm considering the 7163 is to have more streetable power if the 7670 would be too large for this application. Finally, the reason I'm considering a G series is because my tuner highly recommends it (although I do think they rep garrett), would make the piping simpler, and be slightly cheaper. However, considering this is basically a build from the ground up, I would think twinscroll would make the most sense here. Would really appreciate some guidance and constructive criticism here.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 29292
Join Date: Nov 2002
Chapter/Region:
SCIC
Location: Orange County CA
Vehicle:2004 WRX wagon silver |
![]() I think the problem between the 7163 and the 7064 is the turbine opening. they are different, the 7163 is a t25 and the 7670 is a t3 so you cant really swap between the 2 of them.
As for the g series, I saw a bunch of test on you tube that they did witht he g25 660, I looked like you get a good spooling turob but it seems to choke out even if you use the 92ar hotside. What I would use is the new g30 660.Im really thinking that that might be my next new turbo. another turbo yo might consider is the gtx 3067, it s pretty quick spooling turbo with a good amount of power on the top end. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 510864
Join Date: Jan 2020
Chapter/Region:
RMIC
Vehicle:2007 WRX WRB |
![]() I can't speak to these specific turbos but if you want streetable power I would start by looking into where the turbo spooling starts. High boost that doesn't kick on until high into the RPM range of your motor won't be as effective for daily driving as something that starts at a lower RPM. It really depends on where you want your power band to be.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 440533
Join Date: Feb 2016
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 80649
Join Date: Jan 2005
Chapter/Region:
South East
Location: Columbia, SC
Vehicle:2000 2.5 Auto-X RSTi Dusty |
![]() I***8217;d take a 7163 for something fun on the street. Low 400***8217;s on pump gas and higher 400***8217;s on E85. The 7670 wouldn***8217;t hit full boost until after 4K but would give another 50ish hp to both numbers. If I were tracking it***8217;d be a toss up but anything below track stuff and the 7163 is hard to beat.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 440533
Join Date: Feb 2016
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 29292
Join Date: Nov 2002
Chapter/Region:
SCIC
Location: Orange County CA
Vehicle:2004 WRX wagon silver |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 80649
Join Date: Jan 2005
Chapter/Region:
South East
Location: Columbia, SC
Vehicle:2000 2.5 Auto-X RSTi Dusty |
![]() Aluminum chra is really only if you’re trying to save weight. TS is nice and usually gives smoother boost onset but it’s more complicated and expensive. For a simple setup SS is fine.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 112759
Join Date: Apr 2006
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: In the V hole!
Vehicle:2004 Stock OEM AsFu* FoZZY SexyRP |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 440533
Join Date: Feb 2016
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 510909
Join Date: Jan 2020
|
![]() What a monster that will be
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 175624
Join Date: Mar 2008
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Wichita, KS
Vehicle:0304 WRX WRX SY WRB |
![]() They're trying to talk you out of it for the reasons Subydude laid out above. People hear twinscroll and think they're getting the best of both worlds (quick spool and more power), and in general that can be the case. But for those specific turbos, the 7163 will spool faster (which IMO should be the #1 goal for a fun street car) and make close to the same power, for a lot less money. Good twinscroll manifolds/headers are very expensive.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 80649
Join Date: Jan 2005
Chapter/Region:
South East
Location: Columbia, SC
Vehicle:2000 2.5 Auto-X RSTi Dusty |
![]() I've ran both, and while TS is more expensive if you have the scratch I feel like it's worth it. I have a JDM TS manifold and VF37 on my 05 STi and it's really good. I've driven a TS 7163 on a 2.1 stroker and it was also very good. The difference in boost onset is the seller IMO, it's just smoother. SS tends to be more light switchy at the low end, which isn't bad if you're above that rpm all the time. In general you won't make a bunch more power, and full boost might not be more than a few hundred rpm sooner, but the transition to it and how it builds is very different.
I'm likely going to stay TS going forward now that I've had enough experience with it honestly. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | ||
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 440533
Join Date: Feb 2016
|
![]() Thanks! I've been keeping an eye on quite a few builds for a while. After seeing so many people just chase big numbers (as well as seeing engines blow up) I wanted something modest and unique.
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 112759
Join Date: Apr 2006
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: In the V hole!
Vehicle:2004 Stock OEM AsFu* FoZZY SexyRP |
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 293204
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Marion,Iowa
Vehicle:2016 STI White |
![]() Running a EFR7670 twin scroll from ETS lots of extra items to run it, but worth it.
Boost builds quickly and great torque curve. It may not have great peak HP but for a daily driver it is perfect. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 440533
Join Date: Feb 2016
|
![]() I'm right on the edge of getting either a 7163 or a 7670. You don't think it's too big for a DD? Did you go with biggest a/r?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 293204
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Marion,Iowa
Vehicle:2016 STI White |
![]() a/r 1.05
For DD have not had any issues, but have a lot supporting mods. For street 7163 or 7670 will be fun, do not fall into peak horsepower war. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 440533
Join Date: Feb 2016
|
![]() I'm definitely not trying to, honestly I don't really have an hp goal. But at the same time I don't want to limit myself. All supporting mods have/will be done including PNP'd heads, cams, CD blocks, dual pump hanger, 2000cc, etc.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 80649
Join Date: Jan 2005
Chapter/Region:
South East
Location: Columbia, SC
Vehicle:2000 2.5 Auto-X RSTi Dusty |
![]() 7163 will do just fine. A wide and usable true 430 whp power band is considerably faster than a peaky 550 whp. And until you've been in a car with that much power it's hard to fathom.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 440533
Join Date: Feb 2016
|
![]() I didn't realize this but if I'm not mistaken, the 7163 is only made in IWG for the twinscroll version, and the only EWG option is an undivided one. That sucks :l
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 80649
Join Date: Jan 2005
Chapter/Region:
South East
Location: Columbia, SC
Vehicle:2000 2.5 Auto-X RSTi Dusty |
![]() The IWG works fine on the EFR's. Run the high boost canister and you're good to go. Saves a lot of plumbing work and cost vs EWG on a TS setup.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 440533
Join Date: Feb 2016
|
![]() But what about all of the boost problems? From what I understand you have to invest into a new wastegates actuator because the EFRs are notoriously bad for boost creep on their IWG setups
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 80649
Join Date: Jan 2005
Chapter/Region:
South East
Location: Columbia, SC
Vehicle:2000 2.5 Auto-X RSTi Dusty |
![]() The waste gate canister (actuator) is less than $60 online: https://www.dieselpowerproducts.com/...BoCWtAQAvD_BwE
I don't have a ton of knowledge about the B2 frame, but the B1 does not boost creep at all and you need the high boost actuator to run more than about 22 psi. If the B2 is the same general idea, there's no issue with creep, you just need the stiffer actuator if you want to run higher boost. Either way, less than $60 seems a lot cheaper vs two EWG's and the plumbing required. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 440533
Join Date: Feb 2016
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|