|
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-24-2002, 09:19 PM | #1 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 7534
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: manchester, NH
Vehicle:99 impreza rs-t rally blue pearl |
EJ22T bore&stroke?
who knows the bore and stroke of the ej22T motor?
I've been thinking (HEHE This could hurt me), What is the bore and stroke becaues, If the stroke is smaller than the EJ25 motor I may be able to use the EJ25 crank in the EJ22 block and use forged rods for the EJ25. than use 30over pistions for the EJ22T block and some machining I could have a 2.3-2.4L motor(haven't worked out the math yet). with it being more reliable than a built EJ25 block, and more power than a EJ22T block. I thought The EJ25 block and EJ22T block physicaly is the same exact block!(except for the open deck thing) Any machinest on board? any Theorys? has anyone looked into this yet? I heard when you use the EJ22T block with the EJ25 heads you lose a ton of torque that is why i am tring to do this! Thank you Jeff
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
|
06-24-2002, 11:28 PM | #2 |
Sooby Guru
Member#: 1914
Join Date: Jul 2000
Chapter/Region:
SWIC
Location: 2014 Q60S, 2016 Chevy SS
Vehicle:2000 2.5RS w/ EJ22T swap and N20. gone. : ( |
Re: EJ22T bore&stroke?
Double post
Last edited by Eric SS; 06-25-2002 at 12:05 AM. |
06-24-2002, 11:29 PM | #3 | |
Sooby Guru
Member#: 1914
Join Date: Jul 2000
Chapter/Region:
SWIC
Location: 2014 Q60S, 2016 Chevy SS
Vehicle:2000 2.5RS w/ EJ22T swap and N20. gone. : ( |
Re: EJ22T bore&stroke?
Quote:
You will lose some low end torque with the EJ22 with EJ25 heads but the car is definetly drivable still. The torque loss is mostly from the low compression and not the short stroke because as you can see, the stroke is only .16" shorter. By stroking the engine, you will gain some low end torque back but limit your upper rpm power and make the R/S ratio a little worse for turbo applications. Not the best trade off if you ask me because you because as has been shown, the even smaller 2.0L engine has made some incredible power. It would get very expensive to do as well. Hope this helped a little Eric |
|
06-25-2002, 12:24 AM | #4 |
Miss You Mom
Oct 1940 - Feb 2008 Super Moderator Member#: 809
Join Date: Jan 2000
Chapter/Region:
NESIC
Location: NH, Land Of Many Trees
Vehicle:2000 2.5 RS, '14 For 92 5MT SVX |
The EJ22 and EJ25 engines (the heads anyway) are rather different beasts. The EJ22 heads flow rather poorly in comparison to the EJ25 heads. Most issues I've seen people here have with turbo'd EJ25 engines is not conrods or valves or the crank but the pistions- they like to split at the valve relief.
Brian http://www.northursalia.com http://www.imprezamods.com http://www.scoobymods.com http://www.deniedmywarranty.org |
06-25-2002, 02:01 AM | #5 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 12115
Join Date: Nov 2001
|
I thought the equation to work out CC's is,
PI x r2 x stroke x 4. 3.14 x (48.5 x 48.5) x 79 x 4 = 2.33lt Assuming 97mm bore. Where am I going wrong. Happy. |
06-25-2002, 12:07 PM | #6 |
Sooby Guru
Member#: 1914
Join Date: Jul 2000
Chapter/Region:
SWIC
Location: 2014 Q60S, 2016 Chevy SS
Vehicle:2000 2.5RS w/ EJ22T swap and N20. gone. : ( |
[quote]Originally posted by Happy
[b]I thought the equation to work out CC's is, PI x r2 x stroke x 4. 3.14 x (48.5 x 48.5) x 79 x 4 = 2.33lt Assuming 97mm bore. Where am I going wrong. I converted everything to inches first so it might come out a little different. I didn;t test your calculations. Eric |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2.5 = bored and stroked 2.2 | baldcherub | Normally Aspirated Powertrain | 20 | 02-21-2018 09:43 PM |
FS: EJ22T (2.2L stroked to 2.38L) shortblock with lots of goodies | kiwee | Engine/Power/Exhaust | 8 | 05-08-2008 02:35 PM |
EJ22/25 bore & stroke | Olson | Subaru Conversions | 8 | 08-29-2005 06:14 PM |
Engine specifications - Bore & Stroke etc. | Subarusalesman | Normally Aspirated Powertrain | 6 | 12-19-2002 02:00 AM |
NA Engine design: revs, bore & stroke, and what not | kgb | Normally Aspirated Powertrain | 100 | 11-01-2001 01:22 AM |