|
|
|
View Poll Results: SHOULD ALL POSTERS TO THIS FORUM BE OBLIGED TO SHOW UNCORRECTED DYNO RESULTS ? | |||
YES | 79 | 59.40% | |
NO | 58 | 43.61% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 133. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-01-2008, 06:59 AM | #1 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 58433
Join Date: Mar 2004
|
Poll: Shoulld All Posters To This Forum Be Obliged To Post Uncorrected Dyno Results ?
I believe it is now firmly established that SAE results on turbocharged cars are at best meaningless and at worst distortive.Yet most posts in this forum continue to show corrected results.
I know that in general dyno results are generally not a useful indicator (different dynos, conditions etc) but at least we could remove one variable from the equation. What do you think ? IMPORTANT NOTE: A vote for "yes" does not mean that corrected results should not be posted, as long as uncorrected are also shown.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Last edited by macaws; 04-01-2008 at 08:09 AM. |
04-01-2008, 07:13 AM | #2 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 56203
Join Date: Feb 2004
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: south nj
Vehicle:00 RSTI Coupe Twin Scroll 2.5XTR EJ207 |
well if you post uncorrected numbers you'll put down different numbers in the summer and the winter. With it being corrected your numbers will be closer no matter what the temp is outside. I vote for both corrected and uncorrected numbers so we see what the difference is
|
04-01-2008, 07:59 AM | #3 | |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 58433
Join Date: Mar 2004
|
Quote:
|
|
04-01-2008, 08:12 AM | #4 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 123816
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Waterford, MI
Vehicle:2004 Pontiac Sunfire Black |
People can just fake their SAE numbers at the shop. Just say that it is 110 degrees out when it is the middle of winter and it will look better SAE. But there are too many places that cheat the dyno anyways.
|
04-01-2008, 08:14 AM | #5 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 133146
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SC
Vehicle:07 FPgreen 7.37@95 WRX VF39+E85 12.0, 121mph |
this is a great thread
|
04-01-2008, 08:22 AM | #6 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 115420
Join Date: May 2006
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Mountains
Vehicle:Its like a STI..... but it doesn't break |
My feeling is who really cares?????? I doesnt matter whether your car puts down 300hp or 400hp. It matters that it is tuned well and you enjoy it. Plain and simple. All dyno numbers are is pissing contests. I dont participate in those.
|
04-01-2008, 08:39 AM | #7 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 78165
Join Date: Dec 2004
Chapter/Region:
South East
Location: SC
Vehicle:05 STI 35r + e85 |
No because it implies that dyno numbers are comparable.
|
04-01-2008, 08:52 AM | #8 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 127670
Join Date: Sep 2006
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Lehigh Acres, FL
Vehicle:2007 HTA GT3794 Darton Sleeved |
No, because the graph you get is determined by your tuner. Most of the time they will give you what they give you. Most tuners work on more than Subaru's and don't care if some guy named macaws on the interweb wants it a certain way.
|
04-01-2008, 09:06 AM | #9 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 124060
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bloomfield Michigan
Vehicle:2004 WRX STI Silver |
Quote:
Modified engines gain much less hp in cold conditions (and loose less in hot),..and forced induction engines gain even less. (So you should race that Vette when it's hot out,..if he's smart he'll want to race you when it's cold). Modded & forced induction engines might only gain 30% or so of what a stock NA engine does in cold conditions. (By cold I mean a "Density Altitude" of less than 0 feet above sea-level. SAE is actually 77 F, 29.23 baro, and 0% humidity.) So if you have a baro of 30.3 and it's 35F out,..you're probably "below sea-level") in terms of DA. So yes the varying conditions will vary the hp outputs of cars,...but only about 1/3 as much as SAE does. So in actuality,..the uncorrected numbers will be MORE acurate for our cars,..not less. Dynos need to have a full SAE, a 55% SAE and a 30% SAE setting,....for use with the various types of engines. |
|
04-01-2008, 09:19 AM | #10 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 68647
Join Date: Aug 2004
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Richmond, VA
Vehicle:07 STI 35R 05 BMW M3 ZCP |
Yeah, you shouldnt take dyno numbers too seriously. I dont think there are 2 dynos in this world that read the exact same every time. Everyone knows dynos are meant to show gains after modifications, given you have a baseline prior to installing them and everything is done on the same dyno. I think it's also nice to see the torque line, it gives a great indication on how the car drives on the road. This is why I dont mind seeing just a dyno chart posted unlike other members.
Beyond that, I think you're simply looking into dyno plots way too much. They arnt made for bragging rights, timeslips are. |
04-01-2008, 10:19 AM | #11 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 58433
Join Date: Mar 2004
|
For those who argue that the whole issue is irrelevant because dyno numbers are not proof of anything let me say this:
First, I think I recognised this in my first post. Second, in spite of all the complaints about what dyno results prove and requests for time slips, everyone from tuners (good and bad) to newbies to gurus post dyno results on this forum.The very description of the forum calls for the NASIOC community to post dyno results on this forum. Third, many results come from only a few well known shop dynos and can be compared. Fourth, lets at least eliminate a known distorting factor.If some tuners want to rig the results so be it. Some won't and the baddies might just get caught out. Post something constructive or at least don't vote if you think the topic is irrelevant. |
04-01-2008, 10:28 AM | #12 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 144965
Join Date: Mar 2007
Chapter/Region:
NESIC
Location: Southbury,CT
Vehicle:04 WRX STi wrb |
The title of this post should just read:
"AL post YOUR uncorrected dyno results" You know if you,or anyone else on this forum had a car that even came close to that power level,you/they would wallpaper that dyno sheet all over the place... On the other hand,maybe your just sick and tired of watching all the Al haters post in the forum... My vote is NO. Last edited by rooobaru; 04-01-2008 at 11:04 AM. |
04-01-2008, 10:42 AM | #13 | |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 58433
Join Date: Mar 2004
|
Quote:
What are you on about ? As I read Al's posts the screenshots all say "uncorrected". People are voting "no" without understanding the point of this thread. You may not agree with the idea but at least try to understand it and only vote if you think it is useful. |
|
04-01-2008, 11:23 AM | #14 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 33782
Join Date: Mar 2003
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Milton Keynes, UK
Vehicle:96 3MI Racing search FIRST, then PM!!! |
who cares what the dyno says?...its just a number that TRIES to make a correlation with a standard which we all know to vary greatly. What would be better would be to show a know factory baseline in comparison with the recent dyno test if people really wanted to "prove" their power with a dyno graph.
Just my $0.02, Micah |
04-01-2008, 11:37 AM | #15 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 169335
Join Date: Jan 2008
Chapter/Region:
South East
Location: KY
Vehicle:2004 GT52 435/454 04 WRB STI Bailey Tuned! |
I am proud of my dyno results, however if it goes to the track this weekend and doesn't run a good number I could care less! I know how much I picked up hp and tq wise over stock and that means a lot too.
|
04-01-2008, 03:23 PM | #16 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 100694
Join Date: Nov 2005
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Arlington Hts, IL
Vehicle:2003 WRX MPB |
I say yes. I disagree with everyone who doesnt agree with me.
|
04-01-2008, 07:55 PM | #17 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 86078
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Central Pa.
Vehicle:2005 Sti 4094R Twin Scroll |
The best way to post dyno numbers is with a before and after...
There are so many variables that can be thrown in that the only thing that matters in the end is the change that was made... I have had my car on various dynos, and the only thing I really care about is what area needs improved on... If you want "Accurate Dyno Numbers" we would have to pull our engines and have them all dyno'd on the exact same engine dyno, in a controlled enviroment... People can say they want corrected, uncorrected, SAE, whatever... It really doesn't matter in the end... All numbers that a chassis dyno spits out are corrected in some way, even the uncorrected ones.... |
04-01-2008, 08:12 PM | #18 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 171344
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UDel
Vehicle:2006 STi Wagon Black HTA Green |
SCREW correction.
How about some timeslips. |
04-01-2008, 08:30 PM | #19 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 86078
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Central Pa.
Vehicle:2005 Sti 4094R Twin Scroll |
|
04-01-2008, 08:34 PM | #20 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 114299
Join Date: May 2006
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Smallville, KS
|
Who cares. Interpret the dyno numbers as you wish. The variance from dyno to dyno independantly makes the numbers fruitless without a timeslip to prove its worth.
|
04-01-2008, 10:06 PM | #21 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 64908
Join Date: Jun 2004
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: Tuning 8/9sec Subies all over
Vehicle:10.8 XT+9.2@155 GR+ 9.1/157mph 2015 STI |
F dyno numbers... Unless you are posting a dierct before and after, they are meaningless. Even then all they are good for is comparison of your mods or tunes.
Some dynos in sae/uncorrected/std will still read high.. You never know what is what. Time Slips and MPH.. |
04-02-2008, 12:29 AM | #22 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 63179
Join Date: Jun 2004
Chapter/Region:
BAIC
Location: THANKs CrucialRacing, EQTuning
Vehicle:2006 Stock Turbo STi [email protected] VF39 |
Quote:
PLUS ONE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED SIXTY ****ING NINE F dyno Numbers.. |
|
04-02-2008, 02:02 AM | #23 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 140444
Join Date: Feb 2007
Chapter/Region:
NWIC
Location: Near Seattle, WA
Vehicle:05 Stage Free LGT ATP 3076, 6MT, AVO FMIC |
|
04-02-2008, 02:14 AM | #24 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 58433
Join Date: Mar 2004
|
OK- to all the guys who say "who cares" ? How many of you have posted your own dyno numbers at one time or another or at least commented on other numbers.
C'mon own up--- you know who you are. |
04-02-2008, 03:27 AM | #25 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 95840
Join Date: Sep 2005
Chapter/Region:
NWIC
Location: Pasco, WA
Vehicle:sold to a good bud awaiting next car |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Post your dyno results from today. (Mach V) | banzai | Mid Atlantic Impreza Club -- MAIC | 70 | 03-28-2006 10:08 PM |
Hi all, I am new to this forum. | ny98max | Texas Impreza Club Forum -- TXIC | 7 | 07-15-2004 01:35 PM |
hey baic folks, post your dyno results | LEOSPEED | Bay Area Impreza Club Forum -- BAIC | 16 | 11-25-2003 02:22 AM |
Post your dyno results here! | Darryl | Factory 2.0L Turbo Powertrain (EJ Series Factory 2.0L Turbo) | 0 | 11-10-2001 05:40 PM |
I'm new to this forum, please post ur Impreza pics | Mine's | General Forum Archive | 29 | 02-08-2001 11:46 AM |