|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#26 | |
Papi Chulo
Moderator Member#: 53794
Join Date: Jan 2004
Chapter/Region:
RMIC
Location: Boner kill city
Vehicle:... 2017 BMW M2 2017 F-150 |
![]() Quote:
The Bronco is going to be a massive success for Ford and I don’t think it’s a foolish move at all.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 46277
Join Date: Oct 2003
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Vehicle:** LP640 575M DMC-12 |
![]() Since it's been posted in this thread a few times, want to clear something up. It was media rhetoric to go after 'Hummer mpg' after H2 buyers complained because they couldn't figure out why a full time 4WD, 6.0 V8 on a HD chassis weighing in at 6700lbs with 35" tires and the aerodynamics of a ranch house would net 10mpg.
In the alternative my 6.5TD H1 would average 15mpg everywhere. The only significant difference my truck had vs. stock was aftermarket wheels which dropped about 40lbs (each) over the stock steel with runflats. For reference, my '98 H1 would get better mpg than my '99 Dodge Ram 1500 Sport 2WD standard cab/short bed with 5.9/auto which was about 9mpg average in an empty truck . . . actually my Vipers, Murcis and '02 V12 Ferrari get better mpg, than the Ram (LohhhhhL). But 'HUMMER' is the biggest gas guzzler ever and the dealers deserved to be burned to the ground even though there are likely more 5.9 Rams made, per year, than Hummer's in existence (AMG & H1/2/3). ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 73805
Join Date: Nov 2004
|
![]() Mixed up my question with wrong member
Last edited by AVANTI R5; 01-14-2021 at 08:02 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|