Welcome to the North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club Monday October 22, 2018
Home Forums WikiNASIOC Products Store Modifications Upgrade Garage
NASIOC
Go Back   NASIOC > NASIOC General > News & Rumors

Welcome to NASIOC - The world's largest online community for Subaru enthusiasts!
Welcome to the NASIOC.com Subaru forum.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, free of charge, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads. 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-19-2018, 11:31 PM   #126
JustyWRC
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 153088
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Arlington, TN
Vehicle:
2005 Baja Turbo
06/04 For 18 Imp 4dr Sprt

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dwf137 View Post
Quit cherry picking comments.

Edit... read my other posts. I'm I support of a CVT, provided Subaru can up their game. Other automatic offerings are undoubtedly faster than their manual counterparts, and in this segment (Golf R DCT is the only one I can think of) track ready. The sti is a track ready street car. Any auto they come out with needs to be track ready. I think it's telling that on that one perhaps track ready cvt wrx in Japan, they called it a wrx tuned by sti, not giving it the sti name.

Btw, why are the discussions in this thread and the sti thread seemingly backwards? Talking about utility in a sedan thread, and transmission in a levorg concept thread...
I agree. I do think WHEN the STI auto is released, it'll be ready enough.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
JustyWRC is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Old 02-20-2018, 08:39 AM   #127
samagon
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 26859
Join Date: Oct 2002
Chapter/Region: TXIC
Location: undisputed COMBAT! champion
Vehicle:
of TXIC
I also like (oYo)!!!!

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dwf137 View Post
I still respectfully disagree with your statement. A performance car is not only defined by measurable metrics. After all, why would you buy a 40k STI when you could buy a mustang Gt which is likely faster in almost all metrics, and likely cheaper as well? Everyone has preferences, and every car has attributes, that aren't measurable in numbers.
compromise.
samagon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2018, 10:27 AM   #128
bugatti0628
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 447323
Join Date: May 2016
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JustyWRC View Post
I agree. I do think WHEN the STI auto is released, it'll be ready enough.
the subaru engineers are well aware that if they do put an automatic in the STI, it has to be able to handle the torque and heat it is putting out. A cvt cooler is mandatory and it has to be able to respond quickly to stepped and paddle shifts
bugatti0628 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2018, 10:46 AM   #129
RealDealTarheel
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 142447
Join Date: Mar 2007
Chapter/Region: AKIC
Location: Not so Fair...banks
Vehicle:
2018 F-150 Lariat
17 Focus RS

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by samagon View Post
compromise.
This.
RealDealTarheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2018, 10:58 AM   #130
dwf137
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 161333
Join Date: Oct 2007
Chapter/Region: NWIC
Location: Seattle
Vehicle:
'18 Golf R
'14 Outback

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by samagon View Post
compromise.
Not disagreeing with you, but you're missing the point. The compromise is made because of an immeasurable metric that makes one car "better" than the other.

No car can be defined as "better" or "superior" to everyone. You cannot look at one car, compare some stupid numbers, and say that the numbers are lower (or higher) and therefore that car is "better". That's the epitome of magazine racing. Feedback and driver engagement are two metrics that are arguably just as important as any other metric you can compare for a performance car, but not quantifiable in any way.

How about inclement weather driving? That one plays a role for a lot of drivers too and directly attributable to the performance of the car.

How about passenger layout? We're not talking about super cars here, we're talking about sedans/hatchbacks.
dwf137 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2018, 11:12 AM   #131
RealDealTarheel
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 142447
Join Date: Mar 2007
Chapter/Region: AKIC
Location: Not so Fair...banks
Vehicle:
2018 F-150 Lariat
17 Focus RS

Default

The sedan/hatchback comparison kinda goes out the window when you bring the up the Mustang though. Then practicality and inclement weather come into play, enter the compromise cars like the STI.
RealDealTarheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2018, 11:18 AM   #132
dwf137
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 161333
Join Date: Oct 2007
Chapter/Region: NWIC
Location: Seattle
Vehicle:
'18 Golf R
'14 Outback

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RealDealTarheel View Post
The sedan/hatchback comparison kinda goes out the window when you bring the up the Mustang though. Then practicality and inclement weather come into play, enter the compromise cars like the STI.
Sure, but I'd argue that the STI would have metrics showing that it's the "better" car by samagon's standards, not a compromise car, in inclement weather. Take the two cars around a track in the rain/snow and one will come out on top... Those are not numbers that are regularly tested and/or published, so again, immeasurable metrics that define what car is "better".

this discussion is dumb and I'm done. You guys can keep magazine racing if you want. Enjoy your rwd coupes.
dwf137 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2018, 11:30 AM   #133
RealDealTarheel
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 142447
Join Date: Mar 2007
Chapter/Region: AKIC
Location: Not so Fair...banks
Vehicle:
2018 F-150 Lariat
17 Focus RS

Default

Track days in snow....
RealDealTarheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2018, 11:32 AM   #134
samagon
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 26859
Join Date: Oct 2002
Chapter/Region: TXIC
Location: undisputed COMBAT! champion
Vehicle:
of TXIC
I also like (oYo)!!!!

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dwf137 View Post
Not disagreeing with you, but you're missing the point. The compromise is made because of an immeasurable metric that makes one car "better" than the other.

No car can be defined as "better" or "superior" to everyone. You cannot look at one car, compare some stupid numbers, and say that the numbers are lower (or higher) and therefore that car is "better".
but you can.

usually you compromise before you start bench racing though.

Everything that people use to compromise is measurable. If you don't understand someone else's choices I can't help you there, but it's all measurable.

For instance, 4 doors vs 2 doors is very measurable. The value I place on the number of doors is measurable by me. Someone else may not understand that.

fwd is absolutely measurable. The value I place on cars that have this is 0. it's measurable. You may not understand why I don't value FWD cars, but that doesn't make it not measurable.
samagon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2018, 11:48 AM   #135
SCRAPPYDO
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 873
Join Date: Feb 2000
Chapter/Region: TXIC
Location: www.testdrivemylife.com
Vehicle:
2018 Leg / Ridgeline
Datsun 71 240Z & 68 2000

Default

I agree with Samagon completely. We all have personal biases that are formed form our needs and wants in life. The things I want may not be the same as a single guy with no kids. Does not make my valuation of a car any more wrong or right. I have a set of metrics with my OWN person weights attached to each based on my life.

This is why I can cross shop a Ridgeline and a Buick TourX and a Stinger. Okay the stinger is a stretch, but by gosh I will go test drive one!
SCRAPPYDO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2018, 01:15 PM   #136
JustyWRC
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 153088
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Arlington, TN
Vehicle:
2005 Baja Turbo
06/04 For 18 Imp 4dr Sprt

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bugatti0628 View Post
the subaru engineers are well aware that if they do put an automatic in the STI, it has to be able to handle the torque and heat it is putting out. A cvt cooler is mandatory and it has to be able to respond quickly to stepped and paddle shifts
Or they mistake again and give us A-Line 2.0.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RealDealTarheel View Post
Track days in snow....
Sure!!!

https://www.subaruwinterexperience.com/
JustyWRC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2018, 01:54 PM   #137
dwf137
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 161333
Join Date: Oct 2007
Chapter/Region: NWIC
Location: Seattle
Vehicle:
'18 Golf R
'14 Outback

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by samagon View Post
fwd is absolutely measurable. The value I place on cars that have this is 0. it's measurable.
You're missing my point, so I'll make it more clear for you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by samagon View Post
He will literally never drive a performance car with a CVT whether it's better or not. In essence, he's willing to not only make life harder for himself, but drive a lesser performance vehicle because he's too proud to admit that he was wrong.
You claim that a car is a "lesser" car because it might have lower metrics than another, but fail to see that someone might value a manual transmission more than you do.

Saying one car is "better" than another is subjective. /story.

Last edited by dwf137; 02-20-2018 at 02:08 PM.
dwf137 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2018, 02:03 PM   #138
dwf137
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 161333
Join Date: Oct 2007
Chapter/Region: NWIC
Location: Seattle
Vehicle:
'18 Golf R
'14 Outback

Default

To further my point above...

I'm looking at buying a Golf R soon. Assuming I do, it will have a manual transmission. In some metrics, it's "lesser" by your definition. However, in my eyes, performance cars are more defined by driver engagement than they are some stupid magazine racing number. My metrics are different than someone else's and the manual Golf R is the "better" car. So I'm not compromising by buying the "slower" but more engaging vehicle.

I think we're saying the same thing, but you seem to be stuck on calling one vehicle "lesser" and that puts you on a high horse.
dwf137 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2018, 02:20 PM   #139
dwf137
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 161333
Join Date: Oct 2007
Chapter/Region: NWIC
Location: Seattle
Vehicle:
'18 Golf R
'14 Outback

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCRAPPYDO View Post
I agree with Samagon completely. We all have personal biases that are formed form our needs and wants in life. The things I want may not be the same as a single guy with no kids. Does not make my valuation of a car any more wrong or right. I have a set of metrics with my OWN person weights attached to each based on my life.

This is why I can cross shop a Ridgeline and a Buick TourX and a Stinger. Okay the stinger is a stretch, but by gosh I will go test drive one!
Honestly, I think we're all saying the same thing. Perhaps I'm too caught up on Samagon's terminology, but I'm fighting the fact that they stated a CVT car might be the "better" car and anything else would be accepting a "lesser" car instead of admitting someone was wrong. Their original statement is completely counter to what you're stating right now. My point all along is that a CVT might not be the "better" car for someone.
dwf137 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2018, 02:58 PM   #140
RealDealTarheel
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 142447
Join Date: Mar 2007
Chapter/Region: AKIC
Location: Not so Fair...banks
Vehicle:
2018 F-150 Lariat
17 Focus RS

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JustyWRC View Post
I did not know this was a thing, I want it badly now that I see it! It's all of the fun of letting the STI loose on the flight line on the other side of my window without any of the jail time!
RealDealTarheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2018, 05:06 PM   #141
samagon
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 26859
Join Date: Oct 2002
Chapter/Region: TXIC
Location: undisputed COMBAT! champion
Vehicle:
of TXIC
I also like (oYo)!!!!

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dwf137 View Post
You're missing my point, so I'll make it more clear for you.



You claim that a car is a "lesser" car because it might have lower metrics than another, but fail to see that someone might value a manual transmission more than you do.

Saying one car is "better" than another is subjective. /story.
for the same exact vehicle, when you get to that level of granularity, if you favor the slower variant because of driver feedback, then you aren't as interested in performance as you are in driver feedback.

classify it as compromising performance for driver feedback.

I think we're coming at the same problem from different directions and arguing over the method by which we got the same answer.
samagon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2018, 05:19 PM   #142
dwf137
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 161333
Join Date: Oct 2007
Chapter/Region: NWIC
Location: Seattle
Vehicle:
'18 Golf R
'14 Outback

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by samagon View Post
for the same exact vehicle, when you get to that level of granularity, if you favor the slower variant because of driver feedback, then you aren't as interested in performance as you are in driver feedback.

classify it as compromising performance for driver feedback.

I think we're coming at the same problem from different directions and arguing over the method by which we got the same answer.
While I agree with your last line here, I still disagree with everything else.

I do not define a vehicle's performance solely by numbers. An automatic transition variant of a vehicle will never be "better" than a manual equivalent because like you value FWD as 0 (I do as well), automatics get a value of 0 for me. The only compromise in my eyes would be buying an automatic for the sake of numerical bragging rights.

My disagreement comes down to how you're defining a performance vehicle as being "better". And it appears it will stay that way. Enjoy your two pedals.
dwf137 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2018, 07:13 PM   #143
bugatti0628
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 447323
Join Date: May 2016
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JustyWRC View Post
Or they mistake again and give us A-Line 2.0.



Sure!!!

https://www.subaruwinterexperience.com/
A line 2.0 ?
bugatti0628 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2018, 07:24 PM   #144
JustyWRC
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 153088
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Arlington, TN
Vehicle:
2005 Baja Turbo
06/04 For 18 Imp 4dr Sprt

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bugatti0628 View Post
A line 2.0 ?

STI A-line was a detuned 5EAT.
JustyWRC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2018, 06:31 AM   #145
bugatti0628
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 447323
Join Date: May 2016
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JustyWRC View Post
STI A-line was a detuned 5EAT.
oh ok. It is very difficult to make a track car with a cvt. Even tuners see the limitations with increases in power. The 6 speed automatic in the brz seems to be the way to go. It is not limited like the cvt, and it can handle tunes and increases in power without worrying about the cvt chain. No more fear of tuning past stage 1 or 2. The cobb tunes ecu can adjust the rapid shifting the car will be doing, rather than overheating the cvt.
bugatti0628 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2018, 01:02 PM   #146
Skylab
n00b Moderator
Moderator
 
Member#: 4263
Join Date: Feb 2001
Chapter/Region: SCIC
Location: Encinitas
Default

Ok. Keep it on topic.

Act like respectful adults.

Last edited by Skylab; 02-21-2018 at 01:06 PM. Reason: We all have different opinions. Accept it.
Skylab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2018, 05:09 PM   #147
4S-TURBO
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 67807
Join Date: Aug 2004
Chapter/Region: NWIC
Location: Cracker Lobby
Vehicle:
:::: Proud dissentin
ol cuss of a honky

Default

I'm thinking Subaru is bringing back the WRX hatch as either a standalone body or paired with the sedan but the STI will most definitely remain a sedan. I'm really really hoping the Viziv Tourer isn't a crossover hatch instead that's replacing the Forester XT in the lineup. A poor man's CVT adorned GLA AMG.
4S-TURBO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2018, 05:50 PM   #148
Skylab
n00b Moderator
Moderator
 
Member#: 4263
Join Date: Feb 2001
Chapter/Region: SCIC
Location: Encinitas
Default

^
Subaru, IMO, does things against the flow of its competitors.
If they had an STi hatch available, Id have bought that over a Golf R.
Skylab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2018, 06:49 PM   #149
dwf137
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 161333
Join Date: Oct 2007
Chapter/Region: NWIC
Location: Seattle
Vehicle:
'18 Golf R
'14 Outback

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4S-TURBO View Post
the STI will most definitely remain a sedan.
This is an unfortunate truth.
dwf137 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2018, 08:44 PM   #150
JustyWRC
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 153088
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Arlington, TN
Vehicle:
2005 Baja Turbo
06/04 For 18 Imp 4dr Sprt

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4S-TURBO View Post
I'm thinking Subaru is bringing back the WRX hatch as either a standalone body or paired with the sedan but the STI will most definitely remain a sedan. I'm really really hoping the Viziv Tourer isn't a crossover hatch instead that's replacing the Forester XT in the lineup. A poor man's CVT adorned GLA AMG.
I disagree
JustyWRC is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2018 Axivo Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2017, North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club, Inc.