|
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-09-2012, 11:04 PM | #26 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 276209
Join Date: Mar 2011
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Windy City
Vehicle:I am Rub Function>Form |
The late spool is my only concern with this turbo. I'd like to see how it does on a 2.5L. In my opinion it seems like the 68hta still out does this turbo. It spools much sooner, makes similar power, and will likely be about the same price.
Any thoughts on that?
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
|
04-09-2012, 11:07 PM | #27 | |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 79643
Join Date: Jan 2005
Chapter/Region:
NESIC
Location: The internet
Vehicle:2021 STI TE Terminal black pearl |
Quote:
Wait, that was on a 207. Should be similarish though... |
|
04-09-2012, 11:08 PM | #28 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 213345
Join Date: Jun 2009
Chapter/Region:
South East
Location: jacksonville
Vehicle:04 wrx v7 jdm sti white |
im curious how this will do on a ej207 i have the deadbolt super16g and running 19.5 psi.
|
04-09-2012, 11:11 PM | #29 |
Big Ron
Super Moderator Member#: 18062
Join Date: Apr 2002
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: I can save you a ton of cash
Vehicle:on car parts so PM me b4 j00 buy |
I went from Deadbolt Super16G running 20PSI to this. No comparison as it makes more power everywhere. The DB was a good turbo, this one is great.
|
04-09-2012, 11:14 PM | #30 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 213345
Join Date: Jun 2009
Chapter/Region:
South East
Location: jacksonville
Vehicle:04 wrx v7 jdm sti white |
Quote:
|
|
04-09-2012, 11:14 PM | #31 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 276209
Join Date: Mar 2011
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Windy City
Vehicle:I am Rub Function>Form |
Quote:
So hard to compare #'s since different dynos, different days, different set ups, ect... From the general consensus of what I've read/seen this turbo makes about the same #'s as a 68hta on the same engine, yet this turbo spools @ about 4300rpm and I've seen the 68 peak boost by about 3700. That's a huge difference. |
|
04-09-2012, 11:21 PM | #32 | ||
Scooby Guru
Member#: 79643
Join Date: Jan 2005
Chapter/Region:
NESIC
Location: The internet
Vehicle:2021 STI TE Terminal black pearl |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
04-09-2012, 11:43 PM | #33 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 276209
Join Date: Mar 2011
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Windy City
Vehicle:I am Rub Function>Form |
|
04-10-2012, 06:36 AM | #34 | |
Big Ron
Super Moderator Member#: 18062
Join Date: Apr 2002
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: I can save you a ton of cash
Vehicle:on car parts so PM me b4 j00 buy |
205 I think....I'm ignorant of those EJ codes. It's a stock USDM 04 2.0L motor.
Quote:
Post #9 here is a street pull from last night. |
|
04-10-2012, 07:25 AM | #35 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 219717
Join Date: Aug 2009
Chapter/Region:
South East
Location: Milton, Florida
Vehicle:05 FXT Dom2.5R 4EAT FTW!!!! |
Congrats Unabomber, this thing sounds like an amazing AX setup. Graphs can be so misleading sometimes. Preacher's FXT lost tons of torque and a some HP when he went from vf-39 to 20g xt, but his chariot is much faster. With Ron's reputation with Subies I think we can trust what his butt dyno is telling us all.
|
04-10-2012, 08:25 AM | #36 |
NASIOC Vendor
Member#: 198281
Join Date: Dec 2008
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Virginia
Vehicle:2005 WRX/STi WRB of course |
Of course all dynos are different and how they are loaded is often reflected in the differences in plots. This is also a 2.0, and results will reflect the 20% less displacement vs the 2.5 that is obviously a bigger 'pump'.
Transient response is something you don't see on a dyno plot, but you certainly feel on the street and means everything when you talk about real world drivability. Unabomber is a 'say it how it is' kind of guy and been heavily involved with Subies for along time. I don't doubt the results, although I think they are mostly due to the super awesome header Good job Unabomber, I bet it's a blast to drive. |
04-10-2012, 08:34 AM | #37 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 234407
Join Date: Jan 2010
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Smithfield, VA
Vehicle:04 Self-tooned STi |
Quote:
Hope that DB of yours stands up to its reputation on my car and can atleast compare to this on E85... Also to comment on this 68 vs 16gXTR thing. This turbo hold more up top but does spool later so take it for what its worth. Now the 68 has a way different feel in car vs a graph just like this turbo... Be very intrested to see this on E85 as I see 400 being no problem. As stated by Ron before this is the new all around street turbo for the ej205 |
|
04-10-2012, 08:37 AM | #38 | |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 261612
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Vehicle:2002 WRX - 750WHP 9.5s @ 150mph |
Quote:
|
|
04-10-2012, 08:40 AM | #39 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 265757
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: jax
|
Quote:
|
|
04-10-2012, 08:49 AM | #40 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 179023
Join Date: May 2008
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Virginia
Vehicle:07 CGM WRX TR Dom 1.5xtr + PPG's |
So glad to see that this turbo is finally a reality and you've been the guinea pig Ron. Very exciting stuff.
24psi seems very high for 93, but what do I know. If jermaine wanted to put it there hen its probably fine. It makes me wonder how much of your power is from the increase from 20 to 24 psi. It's hard to compare turbos when you increased the boost on one. Regardless, the ball bearing turbos are a lot more fun to drive and I'm glad it has given you what your looking for. I am running a very similar setup, same hotside, same center section, larger cold side (dom 1.5) and spool is about 800rpms sooner. I wonder if it is purely the 2.0 vs 2.5? |
04-10-2012, 08:57 AM | #41 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 179023
Join Date: May 2008
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Virginia
Vehicle:07 CGM WRX TR Dom 1.5xtr + PPG's |
What I really want to know is if this turbo falls on its face after 5000-5500 rpm like the vf39? It's only 2 more lb/min than the vf39/43
I loved my vf39 until it ran oit of power. If it could only have kept breathing at higher rpms I woulda kept her |
04-10-2012, 09:13 AM | #42 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 234407
Join Date: Jan 2010
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Smithfield, VA
Vehicle:04 Self-tooned STi |
Ron can you get us some logs on the 20psi map and the 24psi map? I also wouldn't mind running a airboy and VD plot on it...
|
04-10-2012, 10:57 AM | #43 | |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 79643
Join Date: Jan 2005
Chapter/Region:
NESIC
Location: The internet
Vehicle:2021 STI TE Terminal black pearl |
Quote:
|
|
04-10-2012, 11:16 AM | #44 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 127704
Join Date: Oct 2006
Chapter/Region:
TXIC
Location: TX/Austin
Vehicle:2015 Boosted Stang MAP tuned |
Like to see a log on lower boost to compare MAF values up top....
24psi on 93 flat easy timing curve Wonder what it would do on 22 to 18 psi with a little more timing? Not to get into the boost v timing debate, just out of interest, Id be playing with this all day lol Love to see this on an aggressive E tune on a 2.0 Its impressive with an IWG to hold 24psi like it does Last edited by Kastley85891; 04-10-2012 at 11:22 AM. |
04-10-2012, 11:20 AM | #45 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 235338
Join Date: Jan 2010
Chapter/Region:
South East
Location: Georgia
Vehicle:2002 Faggin Wagon srp |
It holds solidly above 6k unlike a "small" 16g, but initial spool up looks.... meh......
here's a "small" 16g I tuned recently. You can see it starts dropping boost after 5500rpm unlike the "16g-XTR" that Ron has... And again, transient response (as KillerB mentioned) is not something being displayed graphically in our discussion and I would be willing to bet with the BB, its gonna be as good or better than the "small" 16g. The reason I compare it to a "small" 16g is because this is typically considered as the "fastest spooling turbo upgrade over the TD04," and people looking for spool up more than power output would be interested in this data. A little off beat here, but here's my 2 liter with ball bearing 20g. It looks like similar spool to the "16g-XTR" and can definitely displace more air at the same boost levels.... I'd be interested in an Airboy plot from ron's car so we can have a more apples to apples comparo... EDIT: Ron, I don't know if you noticed, but your IAM (dynamic advance multiplier for AP) dropped from 16 from the dyno log, to 13 when you did the log posted in post#9 and there's some fine learning knock during spool up. Might wanna investigate/have your tuner take a look..... (*not being a di(k, just pointing it out) Last edited by dux10; 04-10-2012 at 11:30 AM. |
04-10-2012, 11:25 AM | #46 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 127704
Join Date: Oct 2006
Chapter/Region:
TXIC
Location: TX/Austin
Vehicle:2015 Boosted Stang MAP tuned |
I had an FP 16G hold 22psi to redline NP, thats 'old' technology lol but that was with a boat load of timing. Like I said, Id need to see this on an aggressive tune. My FP hit 22psi @3400 in 3rd.
Id go with an 18GXT or 20GXT on my 2.0 (well I am ;-) ) but purely because I already ran a 16G previously, but if I was coming from a stocker I would for sure consider this turbo and run it hard. Props to OP for trying it. |
04-10-2012, 11:39 AM | #47 |
NASIOC Vendor
Member#: 136396
Join Date: Jan 2007
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Vehicle:2020 STI, 2022 WRX |
Wow great numbers! on pump gas too.. That turbo looks very promising! i wish it was around when i was building my wagon.
Mike |
04-10-2012, 11:43 AM | #48 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 235338
Join Date: Jan 2010
Chapter/Region:
South East
Location: Georgia
Vehicle:2002 Faggin Wagon srp |
|
04-10-2012, 11:52 AM | #49 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 127704
Join Date: Oct 2006
Chapter/Region:
TXIC
Location: TX/Austin
Vehicle:2015 Boosted Stang MAP tuned |
22 peak, flat lining
|
04-10-2012, 11:59 AM | #50 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 235338
Join Date: Jan 2010
Chapter/Region:
South East
Location: Georgia
Vehicle:2002 Faggin Wagon srp |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS : LA/Socal: New Blouch Evo III Big 16G, supporting mods, Greddy Ti-C | Sokana | SCIC Private Classifieds | 9 | 04-09-2012 06:29 AM |
*Help* I need help choosing the better 16g..TD05 Big 16g or FP 16g or EvoIII 16g? | min88 | Factory 2.0L Turbo Powertrain (EJ Series Factory 2.0L Turbo) | 4 | 10-04-2009 12:38 AM |
FS: Blouch Big Evo III 16G, Deatschwerks, TIAL44 EWG, Process West TMIC, Walbro | specialev | NWIC Private Classifieds | 9 | 06-04-2009 03:54 AM |
FS in WA: Blouch Big Evo III 16G, Deatschwerks, TIAL44 EWG, Process West TMIC,Walbro | specialev | Engine/Power/Exhaust | 19 | 06-04-2009 03:54 AM |
FS: Blouch Evo III Big 16g (Pics) | Boxer4u | Engine/Power/Exhaust | 17 | 10-15-2007 10:53 PM |