Welcome to the North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club Friday October 19, 2018
Home Forums WikiNASIOC Products Store Modifications Upgrade Garage
Go Back   NASIOC > NASIOC Technical > Engine Management & Tuning

Welcome to NASIOC - The world's largest online community for Subaru enthusiasts!
Welcome to the NASIOC.com Subaru forum.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, free of charge, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads. 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-19-2003, 07:29 PM   #1
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 40499
Join Date: Jul 2003
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: SE MI
2004 FXT

Default reflash reliability question

Have they been any noted reliability issues with either the Cobb reflash or the ECUtek?

I'm considering getting a stage 2 from one or the other, but I'm curious if this could cause long term engine damage.

Are they any report of failure at 6 months to a year of reflash from anyone out there?

* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
FuelCutOff is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Old 08-19-2003, 10:01 PM   #2
👏 Big Ron 👏
Member#: 18062
Join Date: Apr 2002
Chapter/Region: MAIC
Location: I can save you a ton of cash
on car parts so PM
me b4 j00 buy


Not that I have seen, which doesn't say there isn't a case out there. There might be a few ECUtek cases since some of those folks run aftermarket turbos which can make the engine go boom quicker if not properly tuned. I wouldn't place the blame on ECUtek, but rather the tuner. Most of the Cobb folks are plug and play kinda guys and I think reliability is super high with their stuff. I would say that if you have a stock turbo that either would be a good reliable choice. I would also say that Cobb would be the safer option since ECUtek runs more boost, which it would be safe to assume that would lead to a faster failure rate.
Unabomber is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
H6 engine reliability question asno Outback Forum 9 05-19-2006 09:23 PM
H6 engine reliability question asno Legacy Forum 8 05-10-2003 03:34 AM
gauge reliability question romoranger Newbies & FAQs 1 10-11-2002 09:55 PM
Reliability Question... Purdue WRX Factory 2.0L Turbo Powertrain (EJ Series Factory 2.0L Turbo) 0 07-05-2002 06:00 PM
WRX reliability question White347LX Newbies & FAQs 2 08-14-2001 11:42 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2018 Axivo Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2017, North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club, Inc.